Competing with AI Scientists: Agent-Driven Approach to Astrophysics Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09621v1
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 10:32:20 GMT
- Title: Competing with AI Scientists: Agent-Driven Approach to Astrophysics Research
- Abstract summary: We present an agent-driven approach to the construction of parameter inference pipelines for scientific data analysis.<n>Our method leverages a multi-agent system, Cmbagent, in which specialized agents collaborate to generate research ideas, write and execute code, evaluate results, and iteratively refine the overall pipeline.<n>As a case study, we apply this approach to the FAIR Universe Weak Lensing Uncertainty Challenge, a competition under time constraints focused on robust cosmological parameter inference with realistic observational uncertainties.
- Score: 1.940756743392918
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: We present an agent-driven approach to the construction of parameter inference pipelines for scientific data analysis. Our method leverages a multi-agent system, Cmbagent (the analysis system of the AI scientist Denario), in which specialized agents collaborate to generate research ideas, write and execute code, evaluate results, and iteratively refine the overall pipeline. As a case study, we apply this approach to the FAIR Universe Weak Lensing Uncertainty Challenge, a competition under time constraints focused on robust cosmological parameter inference with realistic observational uncertainties. While the fully autonomous exploration initially did not reach expert-level performance, the integration of human intervention enabled our agent-driven workflow to achieve a first-place result in the challenge. This demonstrates that semi-autonomous agentic systems can compete with, and in some cases surpass, expert solutions. We describe our workflow in detail, including both the autonomous and semi-autonomous exploration by Cmbagent. Our final inference pipeline utilizes parameter-efficient convolutional neural networks, likelihood calibration over a known parameter grid, and multiple regularization techniques. Our results suggest that agent-driven research workflows can provide a scalable framework to rapidly explore and construct pipelines for inference problems.
Related papers
- Agentic-Ideation: Sample Efficient Agentic Trajectories Synthesis for Scientific Ideation Agents [9.918296068965665]
Ideation plays a pivotal role in scientific discovery.<n>Agentic-Ideation is a novel framework comprising an automated trajectory synthesis pipeline and a specialized agentic LLM trained for scientific ideation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-30T07:07:51Z) - Benchmarking AI Agents for Addressing Scientific Challenges Across Scales [118.2204632627895]
SciAgentArena is a systematic benchmark for evaluating AI agents in real-world scientific research scenarios.<n>It comprises approximately 200 tasks with stepwise verification and an interactive, agent-agnostic environment for assessing diverse AI agents.<n>We find that current agents can contribute effectively to well-specified data-analysis, particularly when the task structure and evaluation criteria are clear.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-10T22:55:30Z) - A case study of evaluating AI agents on a neuroscience data-to-discovery pipeline [4.751533658796929]
We present an empirical study of general-purpose coding agents on a fly optogenetics data-to-discovery pipeline.<n>We assess agents on tasks substantially larger than existing benchmarks, datasets orders of magnitude bigger, and evaluation criteria grounded in domain expert standards.<n>We show that agents can solve several individual pipeline stages, suggesting stage-level automation is tractable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-05T15:38:18Z) - Towards a Virtual Neuroscientist: Autonomous Neuroimaging Analysis via Multi-Agent Collaboration [53.772014300855375]
We introduce NIAgent, a multi-agent system for autonomous end-to-end neuroimaging analysis.<n>Unlike conventional flat tool-calling agents, NIAgent adopts a code-centric execution paradigm.<n>We propose a hierarchical verification framework for autonomous quality control, integrating cohort-level metric screening with agentic visual inspection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-10T06:30:19Z) - Transforming Behavioral Neuroscience Discovery with In-Context Learning and AI-Enhanced Tensor Methods [5.319819085855185]
We showcase an example AI-enhanced pipeline designed to transform and accelerate the way that the domain experts in the team are able to gain insights out of experimental data.<n>The application at hand is in the domain of behavioral neuroscience, studying fear generalization in mice.<n>We identify the emerging paradigm of "In-Context Learning" (ICL) as a suitable interface for domain experts to automate parts of their pipeline without the need for or familiarity with AI model training and fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T02:47:46Z) - Opportunities in AI/ML for the Rubin LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration [63.61423859450929]
This white paper surveys the current landscape of AI/ML across DESC's primary cosmological probes and cross-cutting analyses.<n>We identify key methodological research priorities, including Bayesian inference at scale, physics-informed methods, validation frameworks, and active learning for discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-20T18:46:42Z) - SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents [79.10991818561907]
SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T09:18:39Z) - WebResearcher: Unleashing unbounded reasoning capability in Long-Horizon Agents [72.28593628378991]
WebResearcher is an iterative deep-research paradigm that reformulates deep research as a Markov Decision Process.<n>WebResearcher achieves state-of-the-art performance, even surpassing frontier proprietary systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-16T17:57:17Z) - Causal-Copilot: An Autonomous Causal Analysis Agent [25.5944359329613]
Causal-Copilot is an autonomous agent that operationalizes expert-level causal analysis.<n>It supports interactive refinement through natural language, lowering the barrier for non-specialists.<n>Our system fosters a virtuous cycle -- expanding access to advanced causal methods for domain experts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-17T18:05:39Z) - Multi-Agent Sampling: Scaling Inference Compute for Data Synthesis with Tree Search-Based Agentic Collaboration [81.45763823762682]
This work aims to bridge the gap by investigating the problem of data synthesis through multi-agent sampling.<n>We introduce Tree Search-based Orchestrated Agents(TOA), where the workflow evolves iteratively during the sequential sampling process.<n>Our experiments on alignment, machine translation, and mathematical reasoning demonstrate that multi-agent sampling significantly outperforms single-agent sampling as inference compute scales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-22T15:16:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.