Dynamic Summary Generation for Interpretable Multimodal Depression Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11334v1
- Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:34:40 GMT
- Title: Dynamic Summary Generation for Interpretable Multimodal Depression Detection
- Abstract summary: Depression remains widely underdiagnosed and undertreated because stigma and subjective symptom ratings hinder reliable screening.<n>We propose a coarse-to-fine, multi-stage framework that leverages large language models for accurate and interpretable detection.
- Score: 23.358673852385337
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Depression remains widely underdiagnosed and undertreated because stigma and subjective symptom ratings hinder reliable screening. To address this challenge, we propose a coarse-to-fine, multi-stage framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) for accurate and interpretable detection. The pipeline performs binary screening, five-class severity classification, and continuous regression. At each stage, an LLM produces progressively richer clinical summaries that guide a multimodal fusion module integrating text, audio, and video features, yielding predictions with transparent rationale. The system then consolidates all summaries into a concise, human-readable assessment report. Experiments on the E-DAIC and CMDC datasets show significant improvements over state-of-the-art baselines in both accuracy and interpretability.
Related papers
- Concept-Grounded Reasoning with Prompt-Driven Localization for Interpretable Structured Report Generation [66.62662330558906]
CORAL is a multimodal framework that integrates spatial grounding and concept-level supervision into a unified reasoning process.<n>CORAL employs a prompt-driven medical segmentation model to localize lesions and predicts multi-class clinical attributes through a Concept Bottleneck module.<n>Experiments on BUS-CoT and IU X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in diagnostic accuracy, concept consistency, and report quality over strong general-purpose and medical MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-14T10:21:23Z) - Real-World Multi-Modal and Longitudinal Lung Cancer Dataset [9.050510996987436]
We introduce a newly curated dataset designed to support the evaluation of a wide range of learning pipelines under realistic conditions.<n>The dataset comprises a total of 1,365 lung cancer patients and has three imaging modalities (whole-slide images, CT scans, and PET scans), structured clinical data, transcriptomic, and longitudinal follow-up and treatment information.<n>Our results show that, despite high levels of missingness, integrating complementary modalities consistently improves predictive performance over uni-modal approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-04T14:35:10Z) - Resilient Vision-Tabular Multimodal Learning under Modality Missingness [1.696842238811138]
Multimodal deep learning has shown strong potential in medical applications.<n>Most existing approaches implicitly assume complete modality availability.<n>We propose a multimodal transformer framework for joint vision-tabular learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T12:14:13Z) - Less Is More? Selective Visual Attention to High-Importance Regions for Multimodal Radiology Summarization [2.0037149928499827]
ViTAS is a multi-stage pipeline that combines ensemble-guided MedSAM2 lung segmentation, cross-attention for multi-view fusion, Shapley-guided adaptive patch clustering, and hierarchical visual tokenization feeding a ViT.<n>Our findings demonstrate that less but more relevant visual input is not only sufficient but superior for multimodal radiology summarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-31T15:47:01Z) - Cross-Linguistic Persona-Driven Data Synthesis for Robust Multimodal Cognitive Decline Detection [20.599682298329213]
We introduce SynCog, a novel framework integrating controllable zero-shot multimodal data synthesis with Chain-of-Thought deduction fine-tuning.<n>This generative paradigm enables the rapid, zero-shot expansion of clinical corpora across diverse languages.<n>Experiments on the ADReSS and ADReSSo benchmarks demonstrate that augmenting limited clinical data with synthetic phenotypes yields competitive diagnostic performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-08T14:10:05Z) - Liver Fibrosis Quantification and Analysis: The LiQA Dataset and Baseline Method [31.756744402295542]
The LiQA dataset is curated to benchmark algorithms for Liver (LiSeg) and Liver Fibrosis Staging (LiFS) under complex real-world conditions.<n>We describe the challenge's top-performing methodology, which integrates a semi-supervised learning framework with external data for robust segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-08T15:44:24Z) - Explainable Parkinsons Disease Gait Recognition Using Multimodal RGB-D Fusion and Large Language Models [6.2676602262188625]
This paper presents an explainable multimodal framework that integrates RGB and Depth (RGB-D) data to recognize Parkinsonian gait patterns.<n>By combining multimodal feature learning with language-based interpretability, this study bridges the gap between visual recognition and clinical understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-04T03:43:43Z) - METER: Multi-modal Evidence-based Thinking and Explainable Reasoning -- Algorithm and Benchmark [48.78602579128459]
We introduce METER, a unified benchmark for interpretable forgery detection spanning images, videos, audio, and audio-visual content.<n>Our dataset comprises four tracks, each requiring not only real-vs-fake classification but also evidence-chain-based explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-22T03:42:51Z) - Robust Brain Tumor Segmentation with Incomplete MRI Modalities Using Hölder Divergence and Mutual Information-Enhanced Knowledge Transfer [10.66488607852885]
We propose a robust single-modality parallel processing framework that achieves high segmentation accuracy even with incomplete modalities.<n>Our model maintains modality-specific features while dynamically adjusting network parameters based on the available inputs.<n>By using these divergence- and information-based loss functions, the framework effectively quantifies discrepancies between predictions and ground-truth labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-02T00:18:07Z) - Multimodal LLM-Guided Semantic Correction in Text-to-Image Diffusion [52.315729095824906]
MLLM Semantic-Corrected Ping-Pong-Ahead Diffusion (PPAD) is a novel framework that introduces a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) as a semantic observer during inference.<n>It performs real-time analysis on intermediate generations, identifies latent semantic inconsistencies, and translates feedback into controllable signals that actively guide the remaining denoising steps.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate PPAD's significant improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T14:42:35Z) - Continually Evolved Multimodal Foundation Models for Cancer Prognosis [50.43145292874533]
Cancer prognosis is a critical task that involves predicting patient outcomes and survival rates.<n>Previous studies have integrated diverse data modalities, such as clinical notes, medical images, and genomic data, leveraging their complementary information.<n>Existing approaches face two major limitations. First, they struggle to incorporate newly arrived data with varying distributions into training, such as patient records from different hospitals.<n>Second, most multimodal integration methods rely on simplistic concatenation or task-specific pipelines, which fail to capture the complex interdependencies across modalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-30T06:49:57Z) - LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z) - Both Text and Images Leaked! A Systematic Analysis of Data Contamination in Multimodal LLM [53.05486269607166]
multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have significantly enhanced performance across benchmarks.<n>Existing detection methods for unimodal large language models (LLMs) are inadequate for MLLMs due to multimodal data complexity and multi-phase training.<n>We analyze multimodal data contamination using our analytical framework, MM-Detect, which defines two contamination categories-unimodal and cross-modal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T10:44:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.