Functional Misalignment in Human-AI Interactions on Digital Platforms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11459v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 13:35:32 GMT
• Title: Functional Misalignment in Human-AI Interactions on Digital Platforms
• Abstract summary: Algorithmic systems, particularly social media recommenders, have achieved remarkable success in predicting behavior.<n>Yet their widespread adoption has coincided with troubling outcomes, including rising mental health concerns, increasing polarization, and erosion of trust.<n>This paper argues that these effects are consequences of a structural functional misalignment between what algorithms optimize - predictable behavior - and the human goals these predictions are intended to serve.
• Score: 7.607860037394469
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Algorithmic systems, particularly social media recommenders, have achieved remarkable success in predicting behavior. By optimizing for observable signals such as clicks, views, and engagement, these systems effectively capture user attention and guide interaction. Yet their widespread adoption has coincided with troubling outcomes, including rising mental health concerns, increasing polarization, and erosion of trust. This paper argues that these effects are consequences of a structural functional misalignment between what algorithms optimize - predictable behavior - and the human goals these predictions are intended to serve. We propose that this misalignment arises through three mechanisms: (1) a bias toward modeling fast, reactive behavioral signals over reflective judgment, (2) feedback loops that couple user behavior with algorithmic learning, and (3) emergent collective dynamics that amplify these effects at scale. Together, these mechanisms explain how accurate individual-level predictions can produce adverse societal outcomes. We present functional misalignment as a unifying framework and outline a research agenda for studying and mitigating its effects in human-AI interaction systems.

Related papers

• World Models for Embodied Intelligence: From Plausible to Controllable to Actionable [100.13060753774657]
  World models connect perception and decision-making in embodied intelligence by maintaining hidden state, anticipating consequences, comparing interventions, and adapting when execution departs from expectations.<n>This raises a central question: which predictive capabilities improve behavior?<n>We introduce three progressively stronger capability levels: Plausible models preserve task-relevant temporal, geometric, or physical structure; Controllable models additionally predict how interventions alter that structure; and Actionable models translate predictions into measurable gains in planning, action, learning, evaluation, verification, recovery, or data selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-15T06:22:42Z)
• Integrating Explainable Machine Learning and Mixed-Integer Optimization for Personalized Sleep Quality Intervention [5.477477311297089]
  We propose a predictive-prescriptive framework that integrates interpretable machine learning with mixed-integer optimization.<n>A supervised classifier trained on survey data predicts sleep quality, while SHAP-based feature attribution quantifies the influence of modifiable factors.<n>The framework achieves strong predictive performance, with a test F1-score of 0.9544 and an accuracy of 0.9366.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-14T19:54:07Z)
• When Algorithms Mirror Minds: A Confirmation-Aware Social Dynamic Model of Echo Chamber and Homogenization Traps [19.047790323760935]
  We study the emergence and drivers of echo chambers and user homogenization, as well as actionable guidelines for human-centered recommender design.<n>Our findings provide both theoretical and empirical insights into the emergence and drivers of echo chambers and user homogenization, as well as actionable guidelines for human-centered recommender design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-15T14:55:55Z)
• HUMOF: Human Motion Forecasting in Interactive Social Scenes [29.621970821619424]
  Complex scenes present significant challenges for predicting human behaviour due to the abundance of interaction information.<n>We propose an effective method for human motion forecasting in interactive scenes.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance across four public datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T09:21:54Z)
• Dehumanizing Machines: Mitigating Anthropomorphic Behaviors in Text Generation Systems [55.99010491370177]
  How to intervene on such system outputs to mitigate anthropomorphic behaviors and their attendant harmful outcomes remains understudied.<n>We compile an inventory of interventions grounded both in prior literature and a crowdsourcing study where participants edited system outputs to make them less human-like.<n>We also develop a conceptual framework to help characterize the landscape of possible interventions, articulate distinctions between different types of interventions, and provide a theoretical basis for evaluating the effectiveness of different interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T18:06:37Z)
• Investigating social alignment via mirroring in a system of interacting language models [16.304359423423648]
  We study the effect of mirroring on alignment in multi-agent systems.<n>We simulate systems of interacting large language models in this framework.<n>We find that system behavior is strongly influenced by the range of communication of each agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-07T02:19:57Z)
• Graph Machine Learning based Doubly Robust Estimator for Network Causal Effects [17.44202934049009]
  We propose a novel methodology that combines graph machine learning approaches with the double machine learning framework. We demonstrate our method is accurate, robust, and scalable via an extensive simulation study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T20:23:42Z)
• Investigating Human-Identifiable Features Hidden in Adversarial Perturbations [54.39726653562144]
  Our study explores up to five attack algorithms across three datasets. We identify human-identifiable features in adversarial perturbations. Using pixel-level annotations, we extract such features and demonstrate their ability to compromise target models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T22:31:29Z)
• Motion-Scenario Decoupling for Rat-Aware Video Position Prediction: Strategy and Benchmark [49.58762201363483]
  We introduce RatPose, a bio-robot motion prediction dataset constructed by considering the influence factors of individuals and environments. We propose a Dual-stream Motion-Scenario Decoupling framework that effectively separates scenario-oriented and motion-oriented features. We demonstrate significant performance improvements of the proposed textitDMSD framework on different difficulty-level tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T14:14:31Z)
• GASP: Gated Attention For Saliency Prediction [18.963277212703005]
  We present a neural model for integrating social cues and weighting their influences. We show that gaze direction and affective representations contribute a prediction to ground-truth improvement of at least 5% compared to dynamic saliency models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T16:14:09Z)
• Towards Robust and Adaptive Motion Forecasting: A Causal Representation Perspective [72.55093886515824]
  We introduce a causal formalism of motion forecasting, which casts the problem as a dynamic process with three groups of latent variables. We devise a modular architecture that factorizes the representations of invariant mechanisms and style confounders to approximate a causal graph. Experiment results on synthetic and real datasets show that our three proposed components significantly improve the robustness and reusability of the learned motion representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T18:59:09Z)
• Towards Unbiased Visual Emotion Recognition via Causal Intervention [63.74095927462]
  We propose a novel Emotion Recognition Network (IERN) to alleviate the negative effects brought by the dataset bias. A series of designed tests validate the effectiveness of IERN, and experiments on three emotion benchmarks demonstrate that IERN outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-26T10:40:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.