Attention to task structure for cognitive flexibility
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13281v1
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 20:17:39 GMT
- Title: Attention to task structure for cognitive flexibility
- Abstract summary: Generalization and stability are systematically evaluated across environments that vary in richness and task connectivity.<n>We observe that richer environments improve both generalization and stability.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Humans and artificial agents must often learn and switch between multiple tasks in dynamic environments. Success in such settings requires cognitive flexibility: the ability to retain prior knowledge (cognitive stability) while also transferring it to novel tasks (cognitive generalization). Cognitive flexibility research has largely focused on the role of model architecture to achieve these complementary goals. However, it is less well understood how the structure of the environment itself influences cognitive flexibility, and how it interacts with model architecture. To address this gap, we design a multi-task learning environment in which tasks are defined by a combination of two cue dimensions, allowing us to characterize the environment with graph-theory methods. We also introduce gating-based (multiplicative) and concatenation-based attention models that can decompose tasks into components and can sequentially allocate attention to them. We compare the attention-based models' performance in the multi-task learning environment to multilayer perceptrons. Generalization and stability are systematically evaluated across environments that vary in richness and task connectivity. We observe that richer environments improve both generalization and stability. In addition, a critical novel observation is that (graph theory based) connectivity between the tasks in the environment strongly modulates both stability and generalization, with especially pronounced benefits for attention-based models. These findings underscore the importance of considering not only cognitive architectures but also environmental structure and their interaction in shaping multi-task learning, generalization, and stability.
Related papers
- Intrinsic Motivation in Reinforcement Learning: A Research Agenda for Adaptive Self-Organisation [0.0]
We discuss whether intrinsic rewards in artificial neural systems can support adaptation, functional specialisation and higher-level self-organisation.<n>We argue that more capable systems may require complementary objectives, communication, memory, learning at multiple temporal scales and environmental constraints.<n>Experiments are intended to test whether intrinsic learning can lead to adaptive organisation at progressively higher levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-15T15:29:33Z) - Human-Inspired Continuous Learning of Internal Reasoning Processes: Learning How to Think for Adaptive AI Systems [0.11844977816228043]
Internal reasoning processes are crucial for developing AI systems capable of sustained adaptation in dynamic real-world environments.<n>We propose a human-inspired continuous learning framework that unifies reasoning, action, reflection, and verification within a sequential reasoning model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T03:19:04Z) - Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z) - Cognitive Mirrors: Exploring the Diverse Functional Roles of Attention Heads in LLM Reasoning [54.12174882424842]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in a variety of tasks, but remain largely opaque in terms of their internal mechanisms.<n>We propose a novel interpretability framework to systematically analyze the roles and behaviors of attention heads.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-03T10:24:34Z) - The Importance of Being Lazy: Scaling Limits of Continual Learning [60.97756735877614]
We show that increasing model width is only beneficial when it reduces the amount of feature learning, yielding more laziness.<n>We study the intricate relationship between feature learning, task non-stationarity, and forgetting, finding that high feature learning is only beneficial with highly similar tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-20T10:12:38Z) - Cognitive Evolutionary Learning to Select Feature Interactions for Recommender Systems [59.117526206317116]
We show that CELL can adaptively evolve into different models for different tasks and data.
Experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate that CELL significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T02:35:23Z) - Is attention required for ICL? Exploring the Relationship Between Model Architecture and In-Context Learning Ability [39.42414275888214]
We evaluate 13 models capable of causal language modeling across a suite of synthetic in-context learning tasks.
All the considered architectures can perform in-context learning under a wider range of conditions than previously documented.
Several attention alternatives are sometimes competitive with or better in-context learners than transformers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T05:43:06Z) - Autonomous Open-Ended Learning of Tasks with Non-Stationary
Interdependencies [64.0476282000118]
Intrinsic motivations have proven to generate a task-agnostic signal to properly allocate the training time amongst goals.
While the majority of works in the field of intrinsically motivated open-ended learning focus on scenarios where goals are independent from each other, only few of them studied the autonomous acquisition of interdependent tasks.
In particular, we first deepen the analysis of a previous system, showing the importance of incorporating information about the relationships between tasks at a higher level of the architecture.
Then we introduce H-GRAIL, a new system that extends the previous one by adding a new learning layer to store the autonomously acquired sequences
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-16T10:43:01Z) - Avoiding Catastrophe: Active Dendrites Enable Multi-Task Learning in
Dynamic Environments [0.5277756703318046]
Key challenge for AI is to build embodied systems that operate in dynamically changing environments.
Standard deep learning systems often struggle in dynamic scenarios.
In this article we investigate biologically inspired architectures as solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-31T19:52:42Z) - Self-supervised Reinforcement Learning with Independently Controllable
Subgoals [20.29444813790076]
Self-supervised agents set their own goals by exploiting the structure in the environment.
Some of them were applied to learn basic manipulation skills in compositional multi-object environments.
We propose a novel self-supervised agent that estimates relations between environment components and uses them to independently control different parts of the environment state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-09T10:21:02Z) - Behavior Priors for Efficient Reinforcement Learning [97.81587970962232]
We consider how information and architectural constraints can be combined with ideas from the probabilistic modeling literature to learn behavior priors.
We discuss how such latent variable formulations connect to related work on hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) and mutual information and curiosity based objectives.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework by applying it to a range of simulated continuous control domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-27T13:17:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.