V2E: Validating Smart Contract Vulnerabilities through Profit-driven Exploit Generation and Execution
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13611v2
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 11:05:29 GMT
- Title: V2E: Validating Smart Contract Vulnerabilities through Profit-driven Exploit Generation and Execution
- Abstract summary: V2E is a new framework for validating whether a reported vulnerability is truly exploitable.<n>V2E automatically generates Proof-of-Concept (PoC) and then assess if the vulnerability could be triggered and incur any financial loss.<n> Evaluation on 264 manually labeled contracts shows that V2E outperforms the baseline approach.
- Score: 52.57923394143007
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Smart contracts are a critical component of blockchain systems. Due to the large amount of digital assets carried by smart contracts, their security is of critical importance. Although numerous tools have been developed for detecting smart contract vulnerability, their effectiveness remains limited, particularly due to the high false positives included in the reported results. Therefore, developers and auditors are often overwhelmed with manually verifying the reported issues. A fundamental reason behind this is that while a reported vulnerability satisfies specific vulnerable patterns, it may not actually be exploitable, either because the vulnerable code cannot be triggered or it does not result in any financial loss. In this paper, we propose V2E, a new framework for validating whether a reported vulnerability is truly exploitable. The core idea of V2E is to automatically generate executable Proof-of-Concept Exploit (PoC for short), and then assess if the vulnerability could be triggered and incur any real damage (i.e., causing financial loss) by the PoC. While LLMs have shown proficiency in PoC generation, achieving our task is by no means trivial. In detail, it is difficult for LLM to: (1) generate and update PoC to trigger a specific vulnerability, (2) evaluate the PoC's effectiveness to validate exploitable vulnerability. To this end, V2E automates the whole process through a novel combination of PoC generation, validation, and refinement: (1) Firstly, V2E generates targeted PoCs by analyzing potential vulnerability paths. (2) Then, V2E verifies the validity of PoCs through triggerability and profitability analysis. (3) In addition, V2E iteratively refines the generated PoC based on PoC execution feedback, therefore, increasing the chance to confirm the vulnerability. Evaluation on 264 manually labeled contracts shows that V2E outperforms the baseline approach.
Related papers
- Beyond Detection: Agentic Attack Synthesis and Simulation for Smart Contracts [9.850249387268157]
KASS (Knowledge-Augmented Attack Synthesis and Simulation) is a multi-agent framework for executable smart contract exploit verification.<n>It decomposes automated exploit generation into planning, generation, and testing stages.<n>It produces structured attack plans that document exploitation flows, quantify potential asset losses, and serve as semantic false positive filters for static analysis tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-17T06:31:49Z) - SecureForge: Finding and Preventing Vulnerabilities in LLM-Generated Code via Prompt Optimization [61.91729298584227]
We introduce SecureForge, an automated pipeline that audits security risks of frontier models and produces auditing-informed secure system prompts.<n>SecureForge first identifies benign prompts that produce statically detectable vulnerabilities, and then amplifies them into a large synthetic prompt corpus of diverse scenarios.<n>On frontier models, SecureForge yields a statistically significant improvement in both unit test success and output security, with output vulnerabilities reduced by up to 48%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T18:40:47Z) - EvoPoC: Automated Exploit Synthesis for DeFi Smart Contracts via Hierarchical Knowledge Graphs [11.754368842084412]
sys is a knowledge-driven agentic system for end-to-end contract vulnerability detection and exploit synthesis.<n>sys was evaluated on 88 real-world DeFi attacks and 72 audited projects (2,573 contracts)<n>sys identified 16 confirmed 0-day vulnerabilities, helping secure over $70.6M and earning $2,900 in bounties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-04T17:43:52Z) - GoAT-X: A Graph of Auditing Thoughts for Securing Token Transactions in Cross-Chain Contracts [52.51342355102833]
Cross-chain bridges, the critical infrastructure of the multi-chain ecosystem, have become a primary target for attackers.<n>Existing defenses, such as bytecode-level static analysis, are ill-equipped to handle the semantic complexity of cross-chain interactions.<n>We propose GoAT-X, a framework that shifts automated cross-chain smart contracts auditing from pattern matching toward systematic first-principles verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-27T11:34:21Z) - SecPI: Secure Code Generation with Reasoning Models via Security Reasoning Internalization [50.71047638695205]
Reasoning language models (RLMs) are increasingly used in programming.<n>Yet, even state-of-the-art RLMs frequently introduce critical security vulnerabilities in generated code.<n>We present SecPI, a fine-tuning pipeline that teaches RLMs to internalize structured security reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-04T04:29:11Z) - PoCo: Agentic Proof-of-Concept Exploit Generation for Smart Contracts [4.837987507203078]
We introduce POCO, an agentic framework that automatically generates executable proof-of-concept exploits.<n>PoCO generates exploits in an agentic manner by interacting with a set of code-execution tools in a Reason-Act-Observe loop.<n>We evaluate POCO on a dataset of 23 real-world vulnerability reports.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-04T18:03:12Z) - ARMOR: Aligning Secure and Safe Large Language Models via Meticulous Reasoning [64.32925552574115]
ARMOR is a large language model that analyzes jailbreak strategies and extracts the core intent.<n> ARMOR achieves state-of-the-art safety performance, with an average harmful rate of 0.002 and an attack success rate of 0.06 against advanced optimization-based jailbreaks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-14T09:05:54Z) - Decompiling Smart Contracts with a Large Language Model [51.49197239479266]
Despite Etherscan's 78,047,845 smart contracts deployed on (as of May 26, 2025), a mere 767,520 ( 1%) are open source.<n>This opacity necessitates the automated semantic analysis of on-chain smart contract bytecode.<n>We introduce a pioneering decompilation pipeline that transforms bytecode into human-readable and semantically faithful Solidity code.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-24T13:42:59Z) - PoCGen: Generating Proof-of-Concept Exploits for Vulnerabilities in Npm Packages [13.877936187495555]
We present PoCGen, a novel approach to autonomously generate and validate PoC exploits for vulnerabilities in npm packages.<n>PoCGen successfully generates exploits for 77% of the vulnerabilities in the SecBench$.$js dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T12:37:33Z) - To Think or Not to Think: Exploring the Unthinking Vulnerability in Large Reasoning Models [56.19026073319406]
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are designed to solve complex tasks by generating explicit reasoning traces before producing final answers.<n>We reveal a critical vulnerability in LRMs -- termed Unthinking -- wherein the thinking process can be bypassed by manipulating special tokens.<n>In this paper, we investigate this vulnerability from both malicious and beneficial perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-16T10:45:56Z) - Software Vulnerability and Functionality Assessment using LLMs [0.8057006406834466]
We investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can aid with code reviews.
Our investigation focuses on two tasks that we argue are fundamental to good reviews.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-13T11:29:13Z) - ESCORT: Ethereum Smart COntRacTs Vulnerability Detection using Deep
Neural Network and Transfer Learning [80.85273827468063]
Existing machine learning-based vulnerability detection methods are limited and only inspect whether the smart contract is vulnerable.
We propose ESCORT, the first Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based vulnerability detection framework for smart contracts.
We show that ESCORT achieves an average F1-score of 95% on six vulnerability types and the detection time is 0.02 seconds per contract.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-23T15:04:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.