Combining Bayesian and Frequentist Inference for Laboratory-Specific Performance Guarantees in Copy Number Variation Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14305v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 18:01:37 GMT
• Title: Combining Bayesian and Frequentist Inference for Laboratory-Specific Performance Guarantees in Copy Number Variation Detection
• Abstract summary: We show that even robust Bayesian credible intervals, including coarsened posteriors and sandwich-adjusted intervals, are severely miscalibrated on panels with small amplicon counts per gene.<n>We propose a hybrid framework that evaluates Bayesian posterior functionals on validation samples and models the resulting squared losses with a Gamma distribution.
• Score: 0.8602553195689513
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Targeted amplicon panels are widely used in oncology diagnostics, but providing per-gene performance guarantees for copy number variant (CNV) detection remains challenging due to amplification artifacts, process-mismatch heterogeneity, and limited validation sample sizes. While Bayesian CNV callers naturally quantify per-sample uncertainty, translating this into the frequentist population-level guarantees required for clinical validation, coverage rates, false-positive bounds, and minimum detectable copy-number changes, is a fundamentally different inferential problem. We show empirically that even robust Bayesian credible intervals, including coarsened posteriors and sandwich-adjusted intervals, are severely miscalibrated on panels with small amplicon counts per gene. To address this, we propose a hybrid framework that evaluates Bayesian posterior functionals on validation samples and models the resulting squared losses with a Gamma distribution, yielding tolerance intervals with valid frequentist coverage. Three components make the method practical under real-world constraints: (1) imputation that removes the influence of true CNV-positive samples without requiring known ground truth, (2) regularization to address small sample variability, and (3) evidence-based stratification on the log model evidence to accommodate non-exchangeable noise profiles arising from process mismatch. Evaluated on two targeted amplicon panels using leave-one-out cross-validation, the proposed method achieves single-digit mean absolute coverage error across all genes under both process-matched and unmatched conditions, whereas Bayesian comparators exhibit mean absolute errors exceeding 60\% on clinically relevant genes such as ERBB2.

Related papers

• Improving RCT-Based Treatment Effect Estimation Under Covariate Mismatch via Calibrated Alignment [0.0]
  We propose CALM, which bypasses imputation by learning embeddings that map each source's features into a common representation space.<n> OS outcome models are transferred to the RCT embedding space and calibrated using trial data, preserving causal identification from randomization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T17:43:12Z)
• From Calibration to Refinement: Seeking Certainty via Probabilistic Evidence Propagation for Noisy-Label Person Re-Identification [40.73759251488672]
  Existing noise-robust person Re-ID methods rely on loss-correction or sample-selection strategies using softmax outputs.<n>We propose the CAlibration-to-REfinement (CARE) method, a two-stage framework that seeks certainty through probabilistic evidence propagation from calibration to refinement.<n>In the refinement stage, we design the evidence propagation refinement (EPR) that can more accurately distinguish between clean and noisy samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T15:50:15Z)
• Detecting Batch Heterogeneity via Likelihood Clustering [0.9668407688201359]
  Batch effects represent a major confounder in genomic diagnostics.<n>We introduce a method that addresses both limitations by clustering samples according to their Bayesian model evidence.<n>Our method achieves superior clustering accuracy compared to standard correlation-based and dimensionality-reduction approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T01:49:21Z)
• Generate Aligned Anomaly: Region-Guided Few-Shot Anomaly Image-Mask Pair Synthesis for Industrial Inspection [53.137651284042434]
  Anomaly inspection plays a vital role in industrial manufacturing, but the scarcity of anomaly samples limits the effectiveness of existing methods.<n>We propose Generate grained Anomaly (GAA), a region-guided, few-shot anomaly image-mask pair generation framework.<n>GAA generates realistic, diverse, and semantically aligned anomalies using only a small number of samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T12:56:59Z)
• Unlasting: Unpaired Single-Cell Multi-Perturbation Estimation by Dual Conditional Diffusion Implicit Bridges [68.98973318553983]
  We propose a framework based on Dual Diffusion Implicit Bridges (DDIB) to learn the mapping between different data distributions.<n>We integrate gene regulatory network (GRN) information to propagate perturbation signals in a biologically meaningful way.<n>We also incorporate a masking mechanism to predict silent genes, improving the quality of generated profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T09:05:38Z)
• Multi-Metric Adaptive Experimental Design under Fixed Budget with Validation [10.5481503979787]
  Standard A/B tests in online experiments face statistical power challenges when testing multiple candidates simultaneously.<n>This paper proposes a fixed-budget multi-metric AED framework with a two-phase structure: an adaptive exploration phase to identify the best treatment, and a validation phase to verify the treatment's quality and infer statistics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T16:41:11Z)
• ROTI-GCV: Generalized Cross-Validation for right-ROTationally Invariant Data [5.830619388189558]
  Two key tasks in high-dimensional regularized regression are tuning the regularization strength for accurate predictions and estimating the out-of-sample risk.<n>We introduce a new framework, ROTI-GCV, for reliably performing cross-validation under challenging conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T15:50:00Z)
• Breaking the Spurious Causality of Conditional Generation via Fairness Intervention with Corrective Sampling [77.15766509677348]
  Conditional generative models often inherit spurious correlations from the training dataset. This can result in label-conditional distributions that are imbalanced with respect to another latent attribute. We propose a general two-step strategy to mitigate this issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T08:09:33Z)
• Hierarchical Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Contamination-Resistant Anomaly Detection [81.07346419422605]
  Anomaly detection aims at identifying deviant samples from the normal data distribution. Contrastive learning has provided a successful way to sample representation that enables effective discrimination on anomalies. We propose a novel hierarchical semi-supervised contrastive learning framework, for contamination-resistant anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-24T18:49:26Z)
• Statistical and Computational Phase Transitions in Group Testing [73.55361918807883]
  We study the group testing problem where the goal is to identify a set of k infected individuals carrying a rare disease. We consider two different simple random procedures for assigning individuals tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T16:38:50Z)
• Exploiting Sample Uncertainty for Domain Adaptive Person Re-Identification [137.9939571408506]
  We estimate and exploit the credibility of the assigned pseudo-label of each sample to alleviate the influence of noisy labels. Our uncertainty-guided optimization brings significant improvement and achieves the state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T04:09:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.