Filling in the Mechanisms: How do LMs Learn Filler-Gap Dependencies under Developmental Constraints?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14459v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:32:22 GMT
• Title: Filling in the Mechanisms: How do LMs Learn Filler-Gap Dependencies under Developmental Constraints?
• Abstract summary: We evaluate whether representations of filler-gap dependencies transfer between wh-questions and topicalization.<n>Our results suggest shared, yet item-sensitive mechanisms may develop with limited training data.<n>More importantly, LMs still require far more data than humans to learn comparable generalizations.
• Score: 0.31511847280063693
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: For humans, filler-gap dependencies require a shared representation across different syntactic constructions. Although causal analyses suggest this may also be true for LLMs (Boguraev et al., 2025), it is still unclear if such a representation also exists for language models trained on developmentally feasible quantities of data. We applied Distributed Alignment Search (DAS, Geiger et al. (2024)) to LMs trained on varying amounts of data from the BabyLM challenge (Warstadt et al., 2023), to evaluate whether representations of filler-gap dependencies transfer between wh-questions and topicalization, which greatly vary in terms of their input frequency. Our results suggest shared, yet item-sensitive mechanisms may develop with limited training data. More importantly, LMs still require far more data than humans to learn comparable generalizations, highlighting the need for language-specific biases in models of language acquisition.

Related papers

• Ontology Population using LLMs [0.9894420655516563]
  Knowledge graphs (KGs) are increasingly utilized for data integration, representation, and visualization. LLMs offer promising capabilities for such tasks, excelling in natural language understanding and content generation. This study investigates LLM effectiveness for the KG population, focusing on the Enslaved.org Hub Ontology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T15:39:20Z)
• What Languages are Easy to Language-Model? A Perspective from Learning Probabilistic Regular Languages [78.1866280652834]
  Large language models (LM) are distributions over strings.<n>We investigate the learnability of regular LMs (RLMs) by RNN and Transformer LMs.<n>We find that the complexity of the RLM rank is strong and significant predictors of learnability for both RNNs and Transformers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:34:24Z)
• Reliable, Adaptable, and Attributable Language Models with Retrieval [144.26890121729514]
  Parametric language models (LMs) are trained on vast amounts of web data. They face practical challenges such as hallucinations, difficulty in adapting to new data distributions, and a lack of verifiability. We advocate for retrieval-augmented LMs to replace parametric LMs as the next generation of LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T18:22:33Z)
• Acquiring Linguistic Knowledge from Multimodal Input [10.965306219502303]
  In contrast to children, language models (LMs) exhibit considerably inferior data efficiency when acquiring language. We test the hypothesis that this data efficiency gap is partly caused by a lack of multimodal input and grounding in the learning environment of typical language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T23:29:10Z)
• Look Before You Leap: A Universal Emergent Decomposition of Retrieval Tasks in Language Models [58.57279229066477]
  We study how language models (LMs) solve retrieval tasks in diverse situations. We introduce ORION, a collection of structured retrieval tasks spanning six domains. We find that LMs internally decompose retrieval tasks in a modular way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T18:36:43Z)
• Evaluating Neural Language Models as Cognitive Models of Language Acquisition [4.779196219827507]
  We argue that some of the most prominent benchmarks for evaluating the syntactic capacities of neural language models may not be sufficiently rigorous. When trained on small-scale data modeling child language acquisition, the LMs can be readily matched by simple baseline models. We conclude with suggestions for better connecting LMs with the empirical study of child language acquisition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T00:16:17Z)
• CulturaX: A Cleaned, Enormous, and Multilingual Dataset for Large Language Models in 167 Languages [86.90220551111096]
  Training datasets for large language models (LLMs) are often not fully disclosed. We present CulturaX, a substantial multilingual dataset with 6.3 trillion tokens in 167 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T23:49:10Z)
• Data Distribution Bottlenecks in Grounding Language Models to Knowledge Bases [9.610231090476857]
  Language models (LMs) have already demonstrated remarkable abilities in understanding and generating both natural and formal language. This paper is an experimental investigation aimed at uncovering the challenges that LMs encounter when tasked with knowledge base question answering (KBQA) Our experiments reveal that even when employed with our proposed data augmentation techniques, advanced small and large language models exhibit poor performance in various dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T12:06:45Z)
• Simultaneous Machine Translation with Large Language Models [51.470478122113356]
  We investigate the possibility of applying Large Language Models to SimulMT tasks. We conducted experiments using the textttLlama2-7b-chat model on nine different languages from the MUST-C dataset. The results show that LLM outperforms dedicated MT models in terms of BLEU and LAAL metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T04:06:47Z)
• Improving Classifier Training Efficiency for Automatic Cyberbullying Detection with Feature Density [58.64907136562178]
  We study the effectiveness of Feature Density (FD) using different linguistically-backed feature preprocessing methods. We hypothesise that estimating dataset complexity allows for the reduction of the number of required experiments. The difference in linguistic complexity of datasets allows us to additionally discuss the efficacy of linguistically-backed word preprocessing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T15:48:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.