Bureaucratic Silences: What the Canadian AI Register Reveals, Omits, and Obscures

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15514v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 20:48:35 GMT
• Title: Bureaucratic Silences: What the Canadian AI Register Reveals, Omits, and Obscures
• Abstract summary: In November 2025, the Government of Canada operationalized its commitment to transparency by releasing its first Federal AI Register.<n>We argue that such registers are not neutral mirrors of government activity, but active instruments of ontological design that configure the boundaries of accountability.
• Score: 28.163187835238478
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In November 2025, the Government of Canada operationalized its commitment to transparency by releasing its first Federal AI Register. In this paper, we argue that such registers are not neutral mirrors of government activity, but active instruments of ontological design that configure the boundaries of accountability. We analyzed the Register's complete dataset of 409 systems using the Algorithmic Decision-Making Adapted for the Public Sector (ADMAPS) framework, combining quantitative mapping with deductive qualitative coding. Our findings reveal a sharp divergence between the rhetoric of "sovereign AI" and the reality of bureaucratic practice: while 86\% of systems are deployed internally for efficiency, the Register systematically obscures the human discretion, training, and uncertainty management required to operate them. By privileging technical descriptions over sociotechnical context, the Register constructs an ontology of AI as "reliable tooling" rather than "contestable decision-making." We conclude that without a shift in design, such transparency artifacts risk automating accountability into a performative compliance exercise, offering visibility without contestability.

Related papers

• Governing at Machine Speed: An Adaptive Intelligence Architecture for Real-Time AI Policy Enforcement [0.0]
  Enterprise AI adoption has reached 78% of organizations globally, yet the infrastructure to govern that adoption has not kept pace.<n>We propose AGIL, a conceptual five-layer architecture designed to use machine learning for real-time AI governance enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-11T19:35:00Z)
• Co-constructing sociotechnical AI governance: participatory system mapping using algorithm registers [0.6999740786886536]
  Algorithm registers have been championed as a means of providing transparency on the use of algorithms in public services.<n>Yet potential publics differ in their expectations of what should be made transparent and how.<n>It remains unclear how these instruments can represent the sociotechnical systems in which these algorithms are embedded.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T15:27:45Z)
• Traccia: An OpenTelemetry-Based Governance Platform for AI Systems [0.7919969809015938]
  The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Artificial Intelligent (AI) powered autonomous agents has fundamentally changed the existing forms of software governance.<n>Current solutions fail to protect unbound state space agentic architecture from serious threats such as alignment, security concerns, and unauthorized deployment of shadow AI systems.<n>A solution is proposed for overcoming the discussed challenges in form of a coherent multi-level AI governance stack Traccia built on the top of OpenTelemetry infrastructure platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T19:14:21Z)
• Understanding the Role of Algorithm Registers in AI Governance Through Comparative Analysis of China and the UK [9.40272719135206]
  This paper asks how do algorithm registers differ across jurisdictions, and what do these differences reveal about their roles in AI governance?<n>We compare China's Beian system and the UK's Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (ATRS)<n>Our analysis shows that an algorithm register, depending on its design and implementation, can serve functions beyond transparency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-25T09:57:02Z)
• Safe and Certifiable AI Systems: Concepts, Challenges, and Lessons Learned [45.44933002008943]
  This white paper presents the T"UV AUSTRIA Trusted AI framework.<n>It is an end-to-end audit catalog and methodology for assessing and certifying machine learning systems.<n>Building on three pillars - Secure Software Development, Functional Requirements, and Ethics & Data Privacy - it translates the high-level obligations of the EU AI Act into specific, testable criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T17:52:08Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• A Moral Agency Framework for Legitimate Integration of AI in Bureaucracies [0.0]
  Public-sector bureaucracies seek to reap the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI)<n>We present a three-point Moral Agency Framework for legitimate integration of AI in bureaucratic structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T17:49:19Z)
• Ethical AI: Towards Defining a Collective Evaluation Framework [0.3413711585591077]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming sectors such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems.<n>Yet its rapid integration raises urgent ethical concerns related to data ownership, privacy, and systemic bias.<n>This article proposes a modular ethical assessment framework built on ontological blocks of meaning-discrete, interpretable units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T21:10:47Z)
• Watermarking Without Standards Is Not AI Governance [46.71493672772134]
  We argue that current implementations risk serving as symbolic compliance rather than delivering effective oversight.<n>We propose a three-layer framework encompassing technical standards, audit infrastructure, and enforcement mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T18:10:04Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control [44.99833362998488]
  The use of Artificial Intelligence in public administration is expanding rapidly.<n>While AI promises greater efficiency and responsiveness, its integration into government functions raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability.<n>This article applies principal-agent theory to AI adoption as a special case of delegation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T07:46:41Z)
• How VADER is your AI? Towards a definition of artificial intelligence systems appropriate for regulation [39.58317527488534]
  Recent AI regulation proposals adopt AI definitions affecting ICT techniques, approaches, and systems that are not AI.<n>We propose a framework to score how validated as appropriately-defined for regulation (VADER) an AI definition is.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T17:41:15Z)
• Think About the Stakeholders First! Towards an Algorithmic Transparency Playbook for Regulatory Compliance [14.043062659347427]
  Laws are being proposed and passed by governments around the world to regulate Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems implemented into the public and private sectors. Many of these regulations address the transparency of AI systems, and related citizen-aware issues like allowing individuals to have the right to an explanation about how an AI system makes a decision that impacts them. We propose a novel stakeholder-first approach that assists technologists in designing transparent, regulatory compliant systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-10T09:39:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.