DAOnt: A Formal Ontology for EU Data Act Compliance
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16386v1
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 10:03:40 GMT
- Title: DAOnt: A Formal Ontology for EU Data Act Compliance
- Abstract summary: The EU Data Act establishes rules governing data access and sharing across business-to-consumer (B2C), business-to-business (B2B), and business-to-government (B2G) contexts.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive ontology for the EU Data Act, enabling reasoning over data sharing agreements through machine-readable representations.
- Score: 0.45671221781968324
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The EU Data Act establishes comprehensive rules governing data access and sharing across business-to-consumer (B2C), business-to-business (B2B), and business-to-government (B2G) contexts. This paper presents a comprehensive ontology for the EU Data Act, enabling reasoning over data sharing agreements through machine-readable representations. The DAOnt ontology reuses elements from three established ontologies, LKIF-Core, ODRL, and DPV, to capture the normative structure of the Data Act. The ontology captures the main concepts and relationships in the Regulation, and it also operationalises three articles to facilitate compliance checking: Article 4(1) (B2C user access rights), Article 8(6) (B2B trade secret exceptions) and Article 19(2)(a) (B2G competitive use prohibitions). The ontology supports compliance checking through SPARQL queries that return obligations, permissions, and prohibitions, allowing organisations to verify whether data-sharing agreements meet the requirements of the EU Data Act and to assess conditions such as FRAND obligations. By representing key legal concepts in RDF, our work helps bridge the gap between the legal provisions of the Data Act and their computational interpretation. The complete ontology, along with example instances and queries, is available online.
Related papers
- Adtech and Real-Time Bidding under European Data Protection Law [0.3634093556454098]
This article analyzes the extent to which practices of realtime bidding (RTB) are compatible with European data protection law.<n>We show that it is difficult - and perhaps impossible - for website publishers and RTB companies to meet the insecure European data protection law requirements.<n>We conclude that RTB is structurally difficult to reconcile with European data protection law.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-01T15:35:28Z) - PETLP: A Privacy-by-Design Pipeline for Social Media Data in AI Research [2.185322080975722]
PETLP (Privacy-by-design Extract, Transform, Load, and Present) is a compliance framework that embeds legal safeguards directly into extended pipelines.<n>We demonstrate how extraction rights fundamentally differ between qualifying research organisations.<n>We show why true anonymisation remains unachievable for social media data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-12T08:33:40Z) - Lawful and Accountable Personal Data Processing with GDPR-based Access and Usage Control in Distributed Systems [0.0]
This paper proposes a case-generic method for automated normative reasoning that establishes legal arguments for the lawfulness of data processing activities.<n>The arguments are established on the basis of case-specific legal qualifications made by privacy experts, bringing the human in the loop.<n>The resulting system is designed and critically assessed in reference to requirements extracted from the GPDR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-10T10:49:34Z) - A Law Reasoning Benchmark for LLM with Tree-Organized Structures including Factum Probandum, Evidence and Experiences [76.73731245899454]
We propose a transparent law reasoning schema enriched with hierarchical factum probandum, evidence, and implicit experience.<n>Inspired by this schema, we introduce the challenging task, which takes a textual case description and outputs a hierarchical structure justifying the final decision.<n>This benchmark paves the way for transparent and accountable AI-assisted law reasoning in the Intelligent Court''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-02T10:26:54Z) - AnnoCaseLaw: A Richly-Annotated Dataset For Benchmarking Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction [56.797874973414636]
AnnoCaseLaw is a first-of-its-kind dataset of 471 meticulously annotated U.S. Appeals Court negligence cases.<n>Our dataset lays the groundwork for more human-aligned, explainable Legal Judgment Prediction models.<n>Results demonstrate that LJP remains a formidable task, with application of legal precedent proving particularly difficult.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-28T19:14:48Z) - An Analysis of European Data and AI Regulations for Automotive Organizations [0.0]
This report summarizes the European Union's series of data and AI regulations and analyzes them for managers in automotive vehicle manufacturing organizations.
In particular, we highlight the relevant ideas of the regulations, including how they find their roots in earlier legislation.
Overall, we characterize European Union data regulations as a wave set, rooted in historical precedent, with important implications for the automotive industry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T22:38:37Z) - Towards an Enforceable GDPR Specification [49.1574468325115]
Privacy by Design (PbD) is prescribed by modern privacy regulations such as the EU's.
One emerging technique to realize PbD is enforcement (RE)
We present a set of requirements and an iterative methodology for creating formal specifications of legal provisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T09:38:51Z) - SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case
Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system.
Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures.
We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z) - Learning to Limit Data Collection via Scaling Laws: Data Minimization
Compliance in Practice [62.44110411199835]
We build on literature in machine learning law to propose framework for limiting collection based on data interpretation that ties data to system performance.
We formalize a data minimization criterion based on performance curve derivatives and provide an effective and interpretable piecewise power law technique.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-16T19:59:01Z) - Second layer data governance for permissioned blockchains: the privacy
management challenge [58.720142291102135]
In pandemic situations, such as the COVID-19 and Ebola outbreak, the action related to sharing health data is crucial to avoid the massive infection and decrease the number of deaths.
In this sense, permissioned blockchain technology emerges to empower users to get their rights providing data ownership, transparency, and security through an immutable, unified, and distributed database ruled by smart contracts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T13:19:38Z) - Machine Understandable Policies and GDPR Compliance Checking [9.032680855473986]
Towards SPECIAL H2020 project aims to provide a set of tools that can be used by data controllers that automatically check if personal data sharing complies with obligations set forth with obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with regulatory obligations set forth with
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-24T09:41:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.