Forecast Sports Outcomes under Efficient Market Hypothesis: Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Odds-Only and Generalised Linear Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17194v1
• Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 01:50:58 GMT
• Title: Forecast Sports Outcomes under Efficient Market Hypothesis: Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Odds-Only and Generalised Linear Models
• Abstract summary: We propose two methods to overcome the limitations of existing conversion methods.<n> Firstly, we propose an odds-only method to convert betting odds to probabilities without using historical data for model fitting.<n> Secondly, we propose a generalised linear model that utilises historical data for model fitting and then converts betting odds to probabilities.
• Score: 3.686108263907984
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Converting betting odds into accurate outcome probabilities is a fundamental challenge in order to use betting odds as a benchmark for sports forecasting and market efficiency analysis. In this study, we propose two methods to overcome the limitations of existing conversion methods. Firstly, we propose an odds-only method to convert betting odds to probabilities without using historical data for model fitting. While existing odds-only methods, such as Multiplicative, Shin, and Power exist, they do not adjust for biases or relationships we found in our betting odds dataset, which consists of 90014 football matches across five different bookmakers. To overcome these limitations, our proposed Odds-Only-Equal-Profitability-Confidence (OO-EPC) method aligns with the bookmakers' pricing objectives of having equal confidence in profitability for each outcome. We provide empirical evidence from our betting odds dataset that, for the majority of bookmakers, our proposed OO-EPC method outperforms the existing odds-only methods. Beyond controlled experiments, we applied the OO-EPC method under real-world uncertainty by using it for six iterations of an annual basketball outcome forecasting competition. Secondly, we propose a generalised linear model that utilises historical data for model fitting and then converts betting odds to probabilities. Existing generalised linear models attempt to capture relationships that the Efficient Market Hypothesis already captures. To overcome this shortcoming, our proposed Favourite-Longshot-Bias-Adjusted Generalised Linear Model (FL-GLM) fits just one parameter to capture the favourite-longshot bias, providing a more interpretable alternative. We provide empirical evidence from historical football matches where, for all bookmakers, our proposed FL-GLM outperforms the existing multinomial and logistic generalised linear models.

Related papers

• Sharp Convergence Rates for Masked Diffusion Models [53.117058231393834]
  We develop a total-variation based analysis for the Euler method that overcomes limitations.<n>Our results relax assumptions on score estimation, improve parameter dependencies, and establish convergence guarantees.<n>Overall, our analysis introduces a direct TV-based error decomposition along the CTMC trajectory and a decoupling-based path-wise analysis for FHS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T00:47:51Z)
• Discrete Diffusion Models: Novel Analysis and New Sampler Guarantees [70.88473359544084]
  We introduce a new analytical approach for discrete diffusion models that removes the need for regularity assumptions.<n>For the standard $tau$-leaping method, we establish convergence guarantees in KL divergence that scale linearly with vocabulary size.<n>Our approach is also more broadly applicable: it provides the first convergence guarantees for other widely used samplers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T17:42:29Z)
• When three experiments are better than two: Avoiding intractable correlated aleatoric uncertainty by leveraging a novel bias--variance tradeoff [1.1609229408259252]
  Real-world experimental scenarios are characterized by the presence of heteroskedastic aleatoric uncertainty.<n>We propose novel active learning strategies that directly reduce the bias between experimental rounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-04T16:23:54Z)
• Generalized Linear Bandits: Almost Optimal Regret with One-Pass Update [70.38810219913593]
  We study the generalized linear bandit (GLB) problem, a contextual multi-armed bandit framework that extends the classical linear model by incorporating a non-linear link function.<n>GLBs are widely applicable to real-world scenarios, but their non-linear nature introduces significant challenges in achieving both computational and statistical efficiency.<n>We propose a jointly efficient algorithm that attains a nearly optimal regret bound with $mathcalO(1)$ time and space complexities per round.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T02:24:21Z)
• Reconciling Model Multiplicity for Downstream Decision Making [24.335927243672952]
  We show that even when the two predictive models approximately agree on their individual predictions almost everywhere, it is still possible for their induced best-response actions to differ on a substantial portion of the population. We propose a framework that calibrates the predictive models with regard to both the downstream decision-making problem and the individual probability prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T03:36:46Z)
• Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Hypothesis Consolidation of Prediction Rationale [53.152460508207184]
  Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (SFUDA) is a challenging task where a model needs to be adapted to a new domain without access to target domain labels or source domain data. This paper proposes a novel approach that considers multiple prediction hypotheses for each sample and investigates the rationale behind each hypothesis. To achieve the optimal performance, we propose a three-step adaptation process: model pre-adaptation, hypothesis consolidation, and semi-supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T05:53:22Z)
• Non-Exchangeable Conformal Risk Control [12.381447108228635]
  Split conformal prediction has recently sparked great interest due to its ability to provide formally guaranteed uncertainty sets or intervals. We propose non-exchangeable conformal risk control, which allows controlling the expected value of any monotone loss function when the data is not exchangeable. Our framework is flexible, makes very few assumptions, and allows weighting the data based on its relevance for a given test example.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T15:00:19Z)
• Predicting Rare Events by Shrinking Towards Proportional Odds [1.599072005190786]
  We show that the more abundant data in earlier steps may be leveraged to improve estimation of probabilities of rare events. We present PRESTO, a relaxation of the proportional odds model for ordinal regression. We prove that PRESTO consistently estimates the decision boundary weights under a sparsity assumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T02:50:08Z)
• Error-based Knockoffs Inference for Controlled Feature Selection [49.99321384855201]
  We propose an error-based knockoff inference method by integrating the knockoff features, the error-based feature importance statistics, and the stepdown procedure together. The proposed inference procedure does not require specifying a regression model and can handle feature selection with theoretical guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T01:55:59Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.