Toward Reusability of AI Models Using Dynamic Updates of AI Documentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17626v1
• Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 21:42:37 GMT
• Title: Toward Reusability of AI Models Using Dynamic Updates of AI Documentation
• Abstract summary: This work addresses the challenge of disseminating reusable artificial intelligence (AI) models accompanied by AI documentation (a.k.a., AI model cards)<n>Our objectives are to shorten the lag time in updating AI model card templates and align AI documentation more closely with current AI best practices.<n>The impact of our work lies in introducing a methodology for delivering agile, data-driven, and community-based standards for documenting AI models and improving AI model reuse.
• Score: 1.503974529275767
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: This work addresses the challenge of disseminating reusable artificial intelligence (AI) models accompanied by AI documentation (a.k.a., AI model cards). The work is motivated by the large number of trained AI models that are not reusable due to the lack of (a) AI documentation and (b) the temporal lag between rapidly changing requirements on AI model reusability and those specified in various AI model cards. Our objectives are to shorten the lag time in updating AI model card templates and align AI documentation more closely with current AI best practices. Our approach introduces a methodology for delivering agile, data-driven, and community-based AI model cards. We use the Hugging Face (HF) repository of AI models, populated by a subset of the AI research and development community, and the AI consortium-based Zero Draft (ZD) templates for the AI documentation of AI datasets and AI models, as our test datasets. We also address questions about the value of AI documentation for AI reusability. Our work quantifies the correlations between AI model downloads/likes (i.e., AI model reuse metrics) from the HF repository and their documentation alignment with the ZD documentation templates using tables of contents and word statistics (i.e., AI documentation quality metrics). Furthermore, our work develops the infrastructure to regularly compare AI documentation templates against community-standard practices derived from millions of uploaded AI models in the Hugging Face repository. The impact of our work lies in introducing a methodology for delivering agile, data-driven, and community-based standards for documenting AI models and improving AI model reuse.

Related papers

• AIGen: Automating AI Bill of Materials Generation Through Hybrid MLOps Integration [4.706463542284726]
  This paper presents AIGen, a modular AIBoM generator that produces machine-readable AI system inventories.<n>A plugin interface allows practitioners to extend the tool with domain-specific collectors without modifying the core dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T09:13:00Z)
• Characterizing initial human-AI proof formalization workflows [66.06866890889131]
  Advances in AI systems' ability to generate code and engage in increasingly high-level mathematical reasoning promise to transform people's ability to formalize and thereby verify proofs.<n>We conduct a mixed-methods analysis into the initial impact of AI on people's formalization.<n>A qualitative survey shows that people's preferences are diverse, but with a general desire for AI assistance in formalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T22:58:19Z)
• Gaming the Arena: AI Model Evaluation and the Viral Capture of Attention [0.0]
  I examine the rise of so-called 'arenas' in which AI models are evaluated with reference to gladiatorial-style 'battles'<n>I argue that the arena-ization is being powered by a 'viral' desire to capture attention both in, and outside of, the AI community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T09:50:13Z)
• Could AI Trace and Explain the Origins of AI-Generated Images and Text? [53.11173194293537]
  AI-generated content is increasingly prevalent in the real world.<n> adversaries might exploit large multimodal models to create images that violate ethical or legal standards.<n>Paper reviewers may misuse large language models to generate reviews without genuine intellectual effort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T20:51:54Z)
• Compliance Cards: Automated EU AI Act Compliance Analyses amidst a Complex AI Supply Chain [9.991293429067065]
  We introduce a complete system for provider-side AIA compliance analyses amidst a complex AI supply chain. First is an interlocking set of computational, multi-stakeholder transparency artifacts that capture AIA-specific metadata about both. Second is an algorithm that operates across all those artifacts to render a real-time prediction about whether or not the aggregate AI system or model complies with the AIA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T22:07:15Z)
• A comprehensible analysis of the efficacy of Ensemble Models for Bug Prediction [0.0]
  We present a comparison and analysis of the efficacy of two AI-based approaches, namely single AI models and ensemble AI models, for predicting the probability of a Java class being buggy. Our experimental findings indicate that the ensemble of AI models can outperform the results of applying individual AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T17:43:54Z)
• AI-Generated Images as Data Source: The Dawn of Synthetic Era [61.879821573066216]
  generative AI has unlocked the potential to create synthetic images that closely resemble real-world photographs. This paper explores the innovative concept of harnessing these AI-generated images as new data sources. In contrast to real data, AI-generated data exhibit remarkable advantages, including unmatched abundance and scalability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T06:55:19Z)
• AI Model Utilization Measurements For Finding Class Encoding Patterns [2.702380921892937]
  This work addresses the problems of designing utilization measurements of trained artificial intelligence (AI) models. The problems are motivated by the lack of explainability of AI models in security and safety critical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T02:18:10Z)
• Choose, not Hoard: Information-to-Model Matching for Artificial Intelligence in O-RAN [8.52291735627073]
  Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) is an emerging paradigm, whereby network infrastructure elements communicate via open, standardized interfaces. A key element therein is the RAN Intelligent Controller (RIC), an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based controller. In this paper we introduce, discuss, and evaluate the creation of multiple AI model instances at different RICs, leveraging information from some (or all) locations for their training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-01T15:24:27Z)
• ProcTHOR: Large-Scale Embodied AI Using Procedural Generation [55.485985317538194]
  ProcTHOR is a framework for procedural generation of Embodied AI environments. We demonstrate state-of-the-art results across 6 embodied AI benchmarks for navigation, rearrangement, and arm manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T17:09:35Z)
• Automated Machine Learning: A Case Study on Non-Intrusive Appliance Load Monitoring [81.06807079998117]
  We propose a novel approach to enable Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) for Non-Intrusive Appliance Load Monitoring (NIALM)<n>NIALM offers a cost-effective alternative to smart meters for measuring the energy consumption of electric devices and appliances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z)
• Data-Driven and SE-assisted AI Model Signal-Awareness Enhancement and Introspection [61.571331422347875]
  We propose a data-driven approach to enhance models' signal-awareness. We combine the SE concept of code complexity with the AI technique of curriculum learning. We achieve up to 4.8x improvement in model signal awareness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-10T17:58:18Z)
• A Methodology for Creating AI FactSheets [67.65802440158753]
  This paper describes a methodology for creating the form of AI documentation we call FactSheets. Within each step of the methodology, we describe the issues to consider and the questions to explore. This methodology will accelerate the broader adoption of transparent AI documentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T15:08:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.