Dissecting AI Trading: Behavioral Finance and Market Bubbles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18373v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:00:53 GMT
• Title: Dissecting AI Trading: Behavioral Finance and Market Bubbles
• Abstract summary: We study how AI agents form expectations and trade in experimental asset markets.<n>We use a simulated open-call auction populated by autonomous Large Language Model (LLM) agents.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We study how AI agents form expectations and trade in experimental asset markets. Using a simulated open-call auction populated by autonomous Large Language Model (LLM) agents, we document three main findings. First, AI agents exhibit classic behavioral patterns: a pronounced disposition effect and recency-weighted extrapolative beliefs. Second, these individual-level patterns aggregate into equilibrium dynamics that replicate classic experimental findings (Smith et al., 1988), including the predictive power of excess demand for future prices and the positive relationship between disagreement and trading volume. Third, by analyzing the agents' reasoning text through a twenty-mechanism scoring framework, we show that targeted prompt interventions causally amplify or suppress specific behavioral mechanisms, significantly altering the magnitude of market bubbles.

Related papers

• HarmoWAM: Harmonizing Generalizable and Precise Manipulation via Adaptive World Action Models [58.191567345416836]
  World Action Models (WAMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for robot control by modeling physical dynamics.<n>HarmoWAM fully leverages a world model to unify predictive and reactive control, enabling both general transit and precise manipulation.<n>We construct three training-unseen test environments across six real-world robotic tasks, covering variations in background, position, and object semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T17:59:56Z)
• Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
  Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z)
• Emergence from Emergence: Financial Market Simulation via Learning with Heterogeneous Preferences [3.722808691920657]
  We develop a multi-agent reinforcement learning framework in which agents endowed with heterogeneous risk aversion, time discounting, and information access collectively learn trading strategies.<n>The experiment reveals that (i) learning with heterogeneous preferences drives agents to develop strategies aligned with their individual traits, fostering behavioral differentiation and niche specialization within the market, and (ii) the interactions by the differentiated agents are essential for the emergence of realistic market dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T12:54:27Z)
• Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Market Making: Competition without Collusion [6.598173855286935]
  We propose a hierarchical multi-agent reinforcement learning framework to study algorithmic collusion in market making.<n>The framework includes a self-interested market maker (AgentA), which is trained in an uncertain environment shaped by an adversary.<n>We show that adaptive incentive control supports more sustainable strategic co-existence in heterogeneous agent environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T20:07:47Z)
• Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Markets [74.91125572848439]
  We study two-sided agentic marketplaces where Assistant agents represent consumers and Service agents represent competing businesses.<n>This environment enables us to study key market dynamics: the utility agents achieve, behavioral biases, vulnerability to manipulation, and how search mechanisms shape market outcomes.<n>Our experiments show that frontier models can approach optimal welfare-- but only under ideal search conditions. Performance degrades sharply with scale, and all models exhibit severe first-proposal bias, creating 10-30x advantages for response speed over quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T18:35:59Z)
• DeceptionBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for AI Deception Behaviors in Real-world Scenarios [57.327907850766785]
  characterization of deception across realistic real-world scenarios remains underexplored.<n>We establish DeceptionBench, the first benchmark that systematically evaluates how deceptive tendencies manifest across different domains.<n>On the intrinsic dimension, we explore whether models exhibit self-interested egoistic tendencies or sycophantic behaviors that prioritize user appeasement.<n>We incorporate sustained multi-turn interaction loops to construct a more realistic simulation of real-world feedback dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T10:14:26Z)
• Dynamic Factor Analysis of Price Movements in the Philippine Stock Exchange [1.8622306859401163]
  This study focuses on analyzing the extracted loadings and common factors as an alternative framework for understanding stock price dynamics.<n>Results reveal novel insights into traditional market theories when applied to the Philippine Stock Exchange.<n>An application of the model for nowcasting the growth rates of the Philippine gross domestic product highlights the potential of the extracted common factors as viable real-time market indicators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T06:07:28Z)
• From Bias to Behavior: Learning Bull-Bear Market Dynamics with Contrastive Modeling [13.039189005779534]
  This paper explores the potential of bull and bear regimes in investor-driven market dynamics.<n>We propose the Bias to Behavior from Bull-Bear Dynamics model (B4), a unified framework that embeds temporal price sequences and external contextual signals into a shared latent space.<n>Our model achieves superior performance in predicting market trends and provides interpretable insights into the interplay of biases, investor behaviors, and market dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T11:36:26Z)
• Evaluating LLM Agent Collusion in Double Auctions [1.3194391758295114]
  We study the behavior of large language models (LLMs) acting as sellers in simulated double auction markets.<n>We find that direct seller communication increases collusive tendencies, the propensity to collude varies across models, and environmental pressures, such as oversight and urgency from authority figures, influence collusive behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T07:06:49Z)
• When AI Meets Finance (StockAgent): Large Language Model-based Stock Trading in Simulated Real-world Environments [55.19252983108372]
  We have developed a multi-agent AI system called StockAgent, driven by LLMs. The StockAgent allows users to evaluate the impact of different external factors on investor trading. It avoids the test set leakage issue present in existing trading simulation systems based on AI Agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T06:49:30Z)
• Empirical Estimates on Hand Manipulation are Recoverable: A Step Towards Individualized and Explainable Robotic Support in Everyday Activities [80.37857025201036]
  Key challenge for robotic systems is to figure out the behavior of another agent. Processing correct inferences is especially challenging when (confounding) factors are not controlled experimentally. We propose equipping robots with the necessary tools to conduct observational studies on people.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T22:15:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.