Integrating Anomaly Detection into Agentic AI for Proactive Risk Management in Human Activity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19538v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:57:36 GMT
• Title: Integrating Anomaly Detection into Agentic AI for Proactive Risk Management in Human Activity
• Abstract summary: We argue that fall detection and fall prediction can usefully be formulated as anomaly detection problems and more effectively addressed through an agentic AI system.<n>While technical requirements for immediate deployment are beyond the scope of this paper, we propose a conceptual framework that highlights potential value.
• Score: 1.6472101987306018
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Agentic AI, with goal-directed, proactive, and autonomous decision-making capabilities, offers a compelling opportunity to address movement-related risks in human activity, including the persistent hazard of falls among elderly populations. Despite numerous approaches to fall mitigation through fall prediction and detection, existing systems have not yet functioned as universal solutions across care pathways and safety-critical environments. This is largely due to limitations in consistently handling real-world complexity, particularly poor context awareness, high false alarm rates, environmental noise, and data scarcity. We argue that fall detection and fall prediction can usefully be formulated as anomaly detection problems and more effectively addressed through an agentic AI system. More broadly, this perspective enables the early identification of subtle deviations in movement patterns associated with increased risk, whether arising from age-related decline, fatigue, or environmental factors. While technical requirements for immediate deployment are beyond the scope of this paper, we propose a conceptual framework that highlights potential value. This framework promotes a well-orchestrated approach to risk management by dynamically selecting relevant tools and integrating them into adaptive decision-making workflows, rather than relying on static configurations tailored to narrowly defined scenarios.

Related papers

• Uncertainty-Aware Vision-based Risk Object Identification via Conformal Risk Tube Prediction [7.840136094141999]
  Existing approaches make decisions and ignore uncertainty, which could lead to safety-critical failures.<n>Despite these challenges, current methods lack principled framework to model risk uncertainty jointly across space and time.<n>We propose Conformal Risk Prediction unified formulation that captures principled risk uncertainty, provides coverage guarantees for true risks, and produces calibrated risk scores with uncertainty estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T04:13:42Z)
• Can Risk-taking AI-Assistants suitably represent entities [0.0]
  This study investigates the manipulability of risk aversion in language models (LMs)<n>It focuses on gender-specific attitudes, uncertainty, role-based decision-making, and the manipulability of risk aversion.<n>The results suggest directions for refining AI design to better align human and AI risk preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T11:55:31Z)
• SafeMobile: Chain-level Jailbreak Detection and Automated Evaluation for Multimodal Mobile Agents [58.21223208538351]
  This work explores the security issues surrounding mobile multimodal agents.<n>It attempts to construct a risk discrimination mechanism by incorporating behavioral sequence information.<n>It also designs an automated assisted assessment scheme based on a large language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T15:10:00Z)
• A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents [45.53643260046778]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed the rise of autonomous AI agents.<n>These large-model agents mark a paradigm shift from static inference systems to interactive, memory-augmented entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T13:34:34Z)
• Emergent Risk Awareness in Rational Agents under Resource Constraints [2.69407449467596]
  This work aims to increase understanding and interpretability of emergent behaviours of AI agents operating under survival pressure.<n>We provide theoretical and empirical results that quantify the impact of survival-driven preference shifts.<n>We propose mechanisms to mitigate the emergence of risk-seeking or risk-averse behaviours.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T13:31:12Z)
• The Problem of Algorithmic Collisions: Mitigating Unforeseen Risks in a Connected World [2.8775022881551666]
  The increasing deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and other autonomous algorithmic systems presents the world with new systemic risks.<n>Current governance frameworks are inadequate as they lack visibility into this complex ecosystem of interactions.<n>This paper outlines the nature of this challenge and proposes some initial policy suggestions centered on increasing transparency and accountability through phased system registration, a licensing framework for deployment, and enhanced monitoring capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T16:22:18Z)
• Adapting Probabilistic Risk Assessment for AI [0.0]
  General-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems present an urgent risk management challenge.<n>Current methods often rely on selective testing and undocumented assumptions about risk priorities.<n>This paper introduces the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) for AI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T17:59:14Z)
• Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI [90.74347101431474]
  Multi-agent systems of advanced AI pose novel and under-explored risks.<n>We identify three key failure modes based on agents' incentives, as well as seven key risk factors.<n>We highlight several important instances of each risk, as well as promising directions to help mitigate them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T23:03:21Z)
• Safety is Essential for Responsible Open-Ended Systems [47.172735322186]
  Open-Endedness is the ability of AI systems to continuously and autonomously generate novel and diverse artifacts or solutions.<n>This position paper argues that the inherently dynamic and self-propagating nature of Open-Ended AI introduces significant, underexplored risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T21:32:07Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction.<n>Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results.<n>However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges.<n>This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• ABI Approach: Automatic Bias Identification in Decision-Making Under Risk based in an Ontology of Behavioral Economics [46.57327530703435]
  Risk seeking preferences for losses, driven by biases such as loss aversion, pose challenges and can result in severe negative consequences. This research introduces the ABI approach, a novel solution designed to support organizational decision-makers by automatically identifying and explaining risk seeking preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T23:53:46Z)
• Risks of AI Scientists: Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomy [65.77763092833348]
  This perspective examines vulnerabilities in AI scientists, shedding light on potential risks associated with their misuse.<n>We take into account user intent, the specific scientific domain, and their potential impact on the external environment.<n>We propose a triadic framework involving human regulation, agent alignment, and an understanding of environmental feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T18:54:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.