Handbook of Rough Set Extensions and Uncertainty Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19794v1
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 13:20:18 GMT
- Title: Handbook of Rough Set Extensions and Uncertainty Models
- Abstract summary: This book is written as a map of models.<n>Rather than developing a single algorithmic pipeline in depth, it provides a systematic survey of the main rough set paradigms.
- Score: 2.2667044928324747
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Rough set theory models uncertainty by approximating target concepts through lower and upper sets induced by indiscernibility, or more generally, by granulation relations in data tables. This perspective captures vagueness caused by limited observational resolution and supports set-theoretic reasoning about what can be determined with certainty and what remains only possible. This book is written as a map of models. Rather than developing a single algorithmic pipeline in depth, it provides a systematic survey of the main rough set paradigms and their extension routes. More specifically, representative variants are organized according to (i) the underlying granulation mechanism, such as equivalence-based, tolerance-based, covering-based, neighborhood-based, and probabilistic approximations, and (ii) the uncertainty semantics attached to data and relations, such as crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, neutrosophic, and plithogenic settings. The book also explains how each choice changes the form of approximations and the interpretation of boundary regions. Throughout the book, small illustrative examples are used to clarify modeling intent and typical use cases in classification and decision support. Finally, an important clarification of scope should be noted. Since the main purpose of this book is to provide a map of models, the Abstract and Introduction should not lead readers to expect that feature reduction and rule induction are primary objectives. Although these topics are central in the rough set literature, they are treated here mainly as motivating applications and as entry points to the broader research landscape. The principal aim of the book is to survey and position rough set models and their extensions in a systematic and coherent manner.
Related papers
- Elements of Conformal Prediction for Statisticians [17.012816639498023]
Conformal prediction has emerged as a rapidly growing alternative framework for predictive inference.<n>This paper explains the core ideas of conformal prediction and reviews selected methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-25T04:28:00Z) - From Black-box to Causal-box: Towards Building More Interpretable Models [57.23201263629627]
We introduce the notion of causal interpretability, which formalizes when counterfactual queries can be evaluated from a specific class of models.<n>We derive a complete graphical criterion that determines whether a given model architecture supports a given counterfactual query.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T20:03:18Z) - Improving Group Robustness on Spurious Correlation via Evidential Alignment [26.544938760265136]
Deep neural networks often learn and rely on spurious correlations, i.e., superficial associations between non-causal features and the targets.<n>Existing methods typically mitigate this issue by using external group annotations or auxiliary deterministic models.<n>We propose Evidential Alignment, a novel framework that leverages uncertainty quantification to understand the behavior of the biased models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-12T22:47:21Z) - Preference Learning for AI Alignment: a Causal Perspective [55.2480439325792]
We frame this problem in a causal paradigm, providing the rich toolbox of causality to identify persistent challenges.<n>Inheriting from the literature of causal inference, we identify key assumptions necessary for reliable generalisation.<n>We illustrate failure modes of naive reward models and demonstrate how causally-inspired approaches can improve model robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T10:45:42Z) - Explaining the Unexplained: Revealing Hidden Correlations for Better Interpretability [1.8274323268621635]
Real Explainer (RealExp) is an interpretability method that decouples the Shapley Value into individual feature importance and feature correlation importance.<n>RealExp enhances interpretability by precisely quantifying both individual feature contributions and their interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T10:50:50Z) - Enhancement of Approximation Spaces by the Use of Primals and Neighborhood [0.0]
We introduce four new generalized rough set models that draw inspiration from "neighborhoods and primals"
We claim that the current models can preserve nearly all significant aspects associated with the rough set model.
We also demonstrate that the new strategy we define for our everyday health-related problem yields more accurate findings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-23T18:49:13Z) - The Foundations of Tokenization: Statistical and Computational Concerns [51.370165245628975]
Tokenization is a critical step in the NLP pipeline.<n>Despite its recognized importance as a standard representation method in NLP, the theoretical underpinnings of tokenization are not yet fully understood.<n>The present paper contributes to addressing this theoretical gap by proposing a unified formal framework for representing and analyzing tokenizer models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T11:12:28Z) - Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanations [52.498055901649025]
'Model guidance' is the idea of regularizing the models' explanations to ensure that they are "right for the right reasons"
We conduct an in-depth evaluation across various loss functions, attribution methods, models, and 'guidance depths' on the PASCAL VOC 2007 and MS COCO 2014 datasets.
Specifically, we guide the models via bounding box annotations, which are much cheaper to obtain than the commonly used segmentation masks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-21T15:34:50Z) - Granular Generalized Variable Precision Rough Sets and Rational
Approximations [0.24366811507669117]
Granular approximations as per the procedures of VPRS are likely to be more rational than those constructed from a classical perspective under certain conditions.
meta applications to cluster validation, image segmentation and dynamic sorting are invented.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-28T08:08:26Z) - Variational Causal Networks: Approximate Bayesian Inference over Causal
Structures [132.74509389517203]
We introduce a parametric variational family modelled by an autoregressive distribution over the space of discrete DAGs.
In experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed variational posterior is able to provide a good approximation of the true posterior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T17:52:49Z) - Fundamental Limits and Tradeoffs in Invariant Representation Learning [99.2368462915979]
Many machine learning applications involve learning representations that achieve two competing goals.
Minimax game-theoretic formulation represents a fundamental tradeoff between accuracy and invariance.
We provide an information-theoretic analysis of this general and important problem under both classification and regression settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-19T15:24:04Z) - Structural Causal Models Are (Solvable by) Credal Networks [70.45873402967297]
Causal inferences can be obtained by standard algorithms for the updating of credal nets.
This contribution should be regarded as a systematic approach to represent structural causal models by credal networks.
Experiments show that approximate algorithms for credal networks can immediately be used to do causal inference in real-size problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-02T11:19:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.