Near-Future Policy Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20733v1
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 16:20:41 GMT
- Title: Near-Future Policy Optimization
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a core post-training recipe.<n>We propose textbfNear-Future textbfPolicy textbfOptimization (textbfNPO), a simple mixed-policy scheme that learns from a policy's own near-future self.
- Score: 51.760544033045726
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a core post-training recipe. Introducing suitable off-policy trajectories into on-policy exploration accelerates RLVR convergence and raises the performance ceiling, yet finding a source of such trajectories remains the key challenge. Existing mixed-policy methods either import trajectories from external teachers (high-quality but distributionally far) or replay past training trajectories (close but capped in quality), and neither simultaneously satisfies the strong enough (higher $Q$ , more new knowledge to learn) and close enough (lower $V$ , more readily absorbed) conditions required to maximize the effective learning signal $\mathcal{S} = Q/V$. We propose \textbf{N}ear-Future \textbf{P}olicy \textbf{O}ptimization (\textbf{NPO}), a simple mixed-policy scheme that learns from a policy's own near-future self: a later checkpoint from the same training run is a natural source of auxiliary trajectories that is both stronger than the current policy and closer than any external source, directly balancing trajectory quality against variance cost. We validate NPO through two manual interventions, early-stage bootstrapping and late-stage plateau breakthrough, and further propose \textbf{AutoNPO},an adaptive variant that automatically triggers interventions from online training signals and selects the guide checkpoint that maximizes $S$. On Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct with GRPO, NPO improves average performance from 57.88 to 62.84, and AutoNPO pushes it to 63.15, raising the final performance ceiling while accelerating convergence.
Related papers
- Near-Policy: Accelerating On-Policy Distillation via Asynchronous Generation and Selective Packing [44.26853590985694]
Near-Policy Distillation (NPD) is an asynchronous approach that decouples student generation from training.<n>NPD achieves a 8.1x speedup over on-policy baselines and outperforms SFT by 8.09%.<n>Our method enables openPangu-Embedded-1B to reach a state-of-the-art score of 68.73%, outperforming the substantially larger Qwen3-1.7B.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T09:50:53Z) - Improving Search Agent with One Line of Code [68.58667107354253]
Tool-based Agentic Reinforcement Learning (TARL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training search agents to interact with external tools.<n>We propose textbfSearch textbfAgent textbfPolicy textbfOptimization (textbfSAPO), which stabilizes training via a conditional token-level KL constraint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T04:07:39Z) - Stable Asynchrony: Variance-Controlled Off-Policy RL for LLMs [19.079556051442168]
Reinforcement learning (RL) is widely used to improve large language models on reasoning tasks.<n>But for widely adopted critic-free policy-gradient methods such as REINFORCE and GRPO, high asynchrony makes the policy-gradient estimator markedly noisy.<n>We propose a stabilization method for REINFORCE/ GRPO-style algorithms that scales learning rate based on effective sample size to dampen unreliable updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-19T18:40:51Z) - Jackpot: Optimal Budgeted Rejection Sampling for Extreme Actor-Policy Mismatch Reinforcement Learning [31.843129392507716]
Jackpot is a framework that integrates a unified training objective that jointly updates the policy and rollout models.<n>Our theoretical analysis shows that OBRS consistently moves the rollout distribution closer to the target distribution under a controllable acceptance budget.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-05T18:57:01Z) - SOUP: Token-level Single-sample Mix-policy Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models [67.41779761651924]
SOUP is a framework that unifies off- and on-policy learning within individual samples at the token level.<n>It consistently outperforms standard on-policy training and existing off-policy extensions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T09:56:15Z) - Coverage Improvement and Fast Convergence of On-policy Preference Learning [67.36750525893514]
Online on-policy preference learning algorithms for language model alignment can significantly outperform their offline counterparts.<n>We analyze how the sampling policy's coverage evolves throughout on-policy training.<n>We develop principled on-policy schemes for reward distillation in the general function class setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-13T10:46:06Z) - Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Step Rewards [92.26560379363492]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly developed as autonomous agents using reinforcement learning (agentic RL)<n>We introduce implicit step rewards for agentic RL (iStar), a general credit-assignment strategy that integrates seamlessly with standard RL algorithms.<n>We evaluate our method on three challenging agent benchmarks, including WebShop and VisualSokoban, as well as open-ended social interactions with unverifiable rewards in SOTOPIA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-23T16:15:42Z) - On-Policy RL with Optimal Reward Baseline [109.47676554514193]
On-Policy RL with Optimal reward baseline (OPO) is a novel and simplified reinforcement learning algorithm.<n>OPO emphasizes the importance of exact on-policy training, which empirically stabilizes the training process and enhances exploration.<n>Results demonstrate OPO's superior performance and training stability without additional models or regularization terms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T15:58:04Z) - Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage Regression [52.0792918455501]
We propose a novel two-stage policy optimization framework that directly approximates the optimal advantage function.<n>$A$*-PO achieves competitive performance across a wide range of mathematical reasoning benchmarks.<n>It reduces training time by up to 2$times$ and peak memory usage by over 30% compared to PPO, GRPO, and REBEL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T03:58:50Z) - Not All Rollouts are Useful: Down-Sampling Rollouts in LLM Reinforcement Learning [55.15106182268834]
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as the leading approach for enhancing reasoning capabilities in large language models.<n>It faces a fundamental compute and memory asymmetry: rollout generation is embarrassingly parallel and memory-light, whereas policy updates are communication-heavy and memory-intensive.<n>We introduce PODS (Policy Optimization with Down-Sampling), which decouples rollout generation from policy updates by training only on a strategically selected subset of rollouts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-18T17:49:55Z) - Accelerating Proximal Policy Optimization Learning Using Task Prediction for Solving Environments with Delayed Rewards [8.455772877963792]
We introduce two key enhancements to PPO: a hybrid policy architecture that combines an offline policy with an online PPO policy, and a reward shaping mechanism using Time Window Temporal Logic (TWTL)<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through extensive experiments on an inverted pendulum and a lunar lander environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-26T20:22:31Z) - Enhancing Sample Efficiency and Exploration in Reinforcement Learning through the Integration of Diffusion Models and Proximal Policy Optimization [3.2288603733409498]
We present a strictly on policy framework that treats a conditional diffusion model as an adaptable action prior.<n>The prior is pre trained on logged data and used online only at sampling time to propose actions at current on policy states.<n>Results indicate that an adaptable diffusion action prior is a practical way to boost on policy PPO under tight interaction budgets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-02T19:10:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.