AI Governance under Political Turnover: The Alignment Surface of Compliance Design

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21103v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:42:50 GMT
• Title: AI Governance under Political Turnover: The Alignment Surface of Compliance Design
• Abstract summary: Governments are increasingly interested in using AI to make administrative decisions cheaper, more scalable, and more consistent.<n>But for AI to be incorporated into public administration it must be embedded in a compliance layer that makes decisions reviewable, repeatable, and legally defensible.<n>We develop a formal model in which institutions choose the scale of automation, the degree of codification, and safeguards on iterative use.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Governments are increasingly interested in using AI to make administrative decisions cheaper, more scalable, and more consistent. But for probabilistic AI to be incorporated into public administration it must be embedded in a compliance layer that makes decisions reviewable, repeatable, and legally defensible. That layer can improve oversight by making departures from law easier to detect. But it can also create a stable approval boundary that political successors learn to navigate while preserving the appearance of lawful administration. We develop a formal model in which institutions choose the scale of automation, the degree of codification, and safeguards on iterative use. The model shows when these systems become vulnerable to strategic use from within government, why reforms that initially improve oversight can later increase that vulnerability, and why expansions in AI use may be difficult to unwind. Making AI usable can thus make procedures easier for future governments to learn and exploit.

Related papers

• Administrative Law's Fourth Settlement: AI and the Capability-Accountability Trap [0.0]
  Since 1887, administrative law has navigated a "capability-accountability trap"<n>This Article proposes three doctrinal innovations within administrative law to realize this potential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T11:36:01Z)
• Algorithmic Governance in the United States: A Multi-Level Case Analysis of AI Deployment Across Federal, State, and Municipal Authorities [0.0]
  This study examines how AI is used across federal, state, and municipal levels in the United States.<n>At the federal level, AI is most often institutionalized as a tool for high-stakes control.<n>State governments occupy a more ambiguous middle ground, where AI frequently combines supportive functions with algorithmic gatekeeping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T14:36:32Z)
• Institutional AI Sovereignty Through Gateway Architecture: Implementation Report from Fontys ICT [0.0]
  To counter fragmented, high-risk adoption of commercial AI tools, we built and ran an institutional AI platform in a six-month, 300-user pilot.<n>Our solution is a governed gateway platform with three layers: a gateway core enforcing policy, controlling access and budgets, and routing traffic to EU infrastructure by default.<n>The pilot ran reliably with no privacy incidents and strong adoption, enabling EU-default routing, managed spending, and transparent model choices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T12:41:32Z)
• (When) Should We Delegate AI Governance to AIs? Some Lessons from Administrative Law [0.0]
  Advanced AI systems are now being used in AI governance.<n>Using AI for governance risks serious harms because human practitioners may not be able to understand AI decisions.<n>This paper begins to develop a principled framework for when to delegate AI governance to AIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T14:50:37Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control [44.99833362998488]
  The use of Artificial Intelligence in public administration is expanding rapidly.<n>While AI promises greater efficiency and responsiveness, its integration into government functions raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability.<n>This article applies principal-agent theory to AI adoption as a special case of delegation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T07:46:41Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• Computing Power and the Governance of Artificial Intelligence [51.967584623262674]
  Governments and companies have started to leverage compute as a means to govern AI. compute-based policies and technologies have the potential to assist in these areas, but there is significant variation in their readiness for implementation. naive or poorly scoped approaches to compute governance carry significant risks in areas like privacy, economic impacts, and centralization of power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T21:10:21Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Both eyes open: Vigilant Incentives help Regulatory Markets improve AI Safety [69.59465535312815]
  Regulatory Markets for AI is a proposal designed with adaptability in mind. It involves governments setting outcome-based targets for AI companies to achieve. We warn that it is alarmingly easy to stumble on incentives which would prevent Regulatory Markets from achieving this goal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T14:42:05Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.