Algorithmic Governance in the United States: A Multi-Level Case Analysis of AI Deployment Across Federal, State, and Municipal Authorities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08728v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 14:36:32 GMT
• Title: Algorithmic Governance in the United States: A Multi-Level Case Analysis of AI Deployment Across Federal, State, and Municipal Authorities
• Authors: Maxim Dedyaev,
• Abstract summary: This study examines how AI is used across federal, state, and municipal levels in the United States.<n>At the federal level, AI is most often institutionalized as a tool for high-stakes control.<n>State governments occupy a more ambiguous middle ground, where AI frequently combines supportive functions with algorithmic gatekeeping.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence in public governance has generated strong optimism about faster processes, smarter decisions, and more modern administrative systems. Yet despite this enthusiasm, we still know surprisingly little about how AI actually takes shape inside different layers of government. Especially in federal systems where authority is fragmented across multiple levels. In practice, the same algorithm can serve very different purposes. This study responds to that gap by examining how AI is used across federal, state, and municipal levels in the United States. Drawing on a comparative qualitative analysis of thirty AI implementation cases, and guided by a digital-era governance framework combined with a sociotechnical perspective, the study identifies two broad modes of algorithmic governance: control-oriented systems and support-oriented systems. The findings reveal a clear pattern of functional differentiation across levels of government. At the federal level, AI is most often institutionalized as a tool for high-stakes control: supporting surveillance, enforcement, and regulatory oversight. State governments occupy a more ambiguous middle ground, where AI frequently combines supportive functions with algorithmic gatekeeping, particularly in areas such as welfare administration and public health. Municipal governments, by contrast, tend to deploy AI in more pragmatic and service-oriented ways, using it to streamline everyday operations and improve direct interactions with residents. By foregrounding institutional context, this study advances debates on algorithmic governance by demonstrating that the character, function, and risks of AI in the public sector are fundamentally shaped by the level of governance at which these systems are deployed.

Related papers

• The Digital Gorilla: Rebalancing Power in the Age of AI [0.0]
  Article offers a conceptual foundation for AI governance by treating such systems as a fourth societal actor.<n>It develops a Four Societal Actors framework that maps how power flows among these actors across five power modalities.<n>It advances a federalized, polycentric governance architecture and institutionalizes dynamic checks and balances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T17:46:54Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control [44.99833362998488]
  The use of Artificial Intelligence in public administration is expanding rapidly.<n>While AI promises greater efficiency and responsiveness, its integration into government functions raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability.<n>This article applies principal-agent theory to AI adoption as a special case of delegation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T07:46:41Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) in U.S. Federal Government : Principles, Policies, and Practices [0.0]
  Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have made tremendous advancements in the past decades.<n> rapid growth of AI/ML and its proliferation in numerous private and public sector applications, while successful, has opened new challenges and obstacles for regulators.<n>With almost little to no human involvement required for some of the new decision-making AI/ML systems, there is now a pressing need to ensure the responsible use of these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T16:06:37Z)
• AI, Global Governance, and Digital Sovereignty [1.3976439685325095]
  We argue that AI systems will embed in global governance to create dueling dynamics of public/private cooperation and contestation. We conclude by sketching future directions for IR research on AI and global governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T00:05:33Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• Aligning AI with Public Values: Deliberation and Decision-Making for Governing Multimodal LLMs in Political Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  How AI models should deal with political topics has been discussed, but it remains challenging and requires better governance.<n>This paper examines the governance of large language models through individual and collective deliberation, focusing on politically sensitive videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Artificial intelligence in government: Concepts, standards, and a unified framework [0.0]
  Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) hold the promise of transforming government. It is critical that new AI systems behave in alignment with the normative expectations of society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T10:57:20Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Putting AI Ethics into Practice: The Hourglass Model of Organizational AI Governance [0.0]
  We present an AI governance framework, which targets organizations that develop and use AI systems. The framework is designed to help organizations deploying AI systems translate ethical AI principles into practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T08:55:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.