A single algorithm for both restless and rested rotting bandits

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21432v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 08:48:52 GMT
• Title: A single algorithm for both restless and rested rotting bandits
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel algorithm, Rotting Adaptive Window UCB, that achieves near-optimal regret in both rotting rested and restless bandit.<n>This is in striking contrast with previous negative results showing that no algorithm can achieve similar results as soon as rewards are allowed to increase.
• Score: 65.63283411693489
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In many application domains (e.g., recommender systems, intelligent tutoring systems), the rewards associated to the actions tend to decrease over time. This decay is either caused by the actions executed in the past (e.g., a user may get bored when songs of the same genre are recommended over and over) or by an external factor (e.g., content becomes outdated). These two situations can be modeled as specific instances of the rested and restless bandit settings, where arms are rotting (i.e., their value decrease over time). These problems were thought to be significantly different, since Levine et al. (2017) showed that state-of-the-art algorithms for restless bandit perform poorly in the rested rotting setting. In this paper, we introduce a novel algorithm, Rotting Adaptive Window UCB (RAW-UCB), that achieves near-optimal regret in both rotting rested and restless bandit, without any prior knowledge of the setting (rested or restless) and the type of non-stationarity (e.g., piece-wise constant, bounded variation). This is in striking contrast with previous negative results showing that no algorithm can achieve similar results as soon as rewards are allowed to increase. We confirm our theoretical findings on a number of synthetic and dataset-based experiments.

Related papers

• Bridging Rested and Restless Bandits with Graph-Triggering: Rising and Rotting [67.1631453378926]
  Graph-Triggered Bandits is a framework to generalize rested and restless bandits. In this work, we focus on two specific types of monotonic bandits: rising, where the expected reward of an arm grows as the number of triggers increases, and rotting, where the opposite behavior occurs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T18:23:07Z)
• An Adaptive Approach for Infinitely Many-armed Bandits under Generalized Rotting Constraints [29.596684377841182]
  In this study, we consider the infinitely many-armed bandit problems in a rested rotting setting, where the mean reward of an arm may decrease with each pull, while otherwise, it remains unchanged.<n>We introduce an algorithm that utilizes UCB with an adaptive sliding window, designed to manage the bias and variance trade-off arising due to rotting rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T14:11:54Z)
• Variance-Aware Regret Bounds for Stochastic Contextual Dueling Bandits [53.281230333364505]
  This paper studies the problem of contextual dueling bandits, where the binary comparison of dueling arms is generated from a generalized linear model (GLM) We propose a new SupLinUCB-type algorithm that enjoys computational efficiency and a variance-aware regret bound $tilde Obig(dsqrtsum_t=1Tsigma_t2 + dbig)$. Our regret bound naturally aligns with the intuitive expectation in scenarios where the comparison is deterministic, the algorithm only suffers from an $tilde O(d)$ regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T08:15:52Z)
• Multi-Armed Bandit Problem with Temporally-Partitioned Rewards: When Partial Feedback Counts [53.579515853222986]
  We study a novel bandit setting, namely Multi-Armed Bandit with Temporally-Partitioned Rewards (TP-MAB) This setting is a natural extension of delayed-feedback bandits to the case in which rewards may be dilated over a finite-time span after the pull. We provide two algorithms to address TP-MAB problems, namely, TP-UCB-FR and TP-UCB-EW.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T15:56:59Z)
• The price of unfairness in linear bandits with biased feedback [62.25313751895011]
  We study the problem of sequential decision making with biased linear bandit feedback. We show that the worst case regret is higher than the dT 1/2 log(T) regret rate obtained under unbiased feedback. Interestingly, the gap-dependent rates reveal the existence of non-trivial instances where the problem is no more difficult than its unbiased counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-18T08:03:20Z)
• On Slowly-varying Non-stationary Bandits [25.305949034527202]
  We consider dynamic regret in non-stationary bandits with a slowly varying property. We establish the first instance-dependent regret upper bound for slowly varying non-stationary bandits. We show that our algorithm is essentially minimax optimal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T12:56:19Z)
• Break your Bandit Routine with LSD Rewards: a Last Switch Dependent Analysis of Satiation and Seasonality [6.146046338698175]
  We introduce a novel non-stationary bandit problem, where the expected reward of an arm is fully determined by the time elapsed since the arm last took part in a switch of actions. Our model generalizes previous notions of delay-dependent rewards, and also relaxes most assumptions on the reward function. We prove an algorithm and prove a bound on its regret with respect to the optimal non-stationary policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T14:53:13Z)
• Adaptive Algorithms for Multi-armed Bandit with Composite and Anonymous Feedback [32.62857394584907]
  We study the multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem with composite and anonymous feedback. We propose adaptive algorithms for both the adversarial and non- adversarial cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-13T12:25:41Z)
• Lenient Regret for Multi-Armed Bandits [72.56064196252498]
  We consider the Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) problem, where an agent sequentially chooses actions and observes rewards for the actions it took. While the majority of algorithms try to minimize the regret, i.e., the cumulative difference between the reward of the best action and the agent's action, this criterion might lead to undesirable results. We suggest a new, more lenient, regret criterion that ignores suboptimality gaps smaller than some $epsilon$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T08:30:52Z)
• On Regret with Multiple Best Arms [12.315392649501101]
  We study a regret problem with the existence of multiple best/near-optimal arms in a bandit setting. Our goal is to design algorithms that can automatically adapt to the unknown hardness of the problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T04:01:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.