Closing the Loop: A Software Framework for AI to Support Business Decision Making

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24116v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 07:11:57 GMT
• Title: Closing the Loop: A Software Framework for AI to Support Business Decision Making
• Abstract summary: We develop a software framework that enables rapid iteration and learning speeds for AI agents.<n>We enrich causal analysis with heterogeneous effects, policy algorithms, mediation analysis, and forecasts of effects.<n>We evaluate the approach on various objectives in experiment analysis, and show that the framework improves code correctness, reduces lines of code, and is more performant than a baseline analysis constructed by a vanilla agent.
• Score: 0.07519872646378833
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Create an idea, prototype it, evaluate if users like it, then learn. It is the circle of business. If AI can operate in all parts of the circle, it will enable rapid iteration and learning speeds for businesses. Experiment platforms that deploy experiments to evaluate return on investment for businesses are abundant, but systems that help businesses learn personalization, mechanisms, and what to ideate next, are rare. Among technologies that do exist, they cannot be well orchestrated in a single software interface that can be safely and efficiently leveraged by an AI agent. These challenges make it difficult to teach an AI agent how to learn within a robust experimentation framework, and difficult for an AI agent to operate and iterate for the business. We offer a two part solution: one half that is rooted in mathematical reductions to contain complexity, and one half that is rooted in software design to optimize for orchestration, software safety, and multiplicity. Our solution, a software framework, moves beyond the simple treatment effect computed as a difference in means. To create a better understanding of a business and its customers, we enrich causal analysis with heterogeneous effects, policy algorithms, mediation analysis, and forecasts of effects. To have an AI complete the iteration cycle faster, we further enrich the analysis with variance reduction and anytime valid inference. The enrichments are made compatible across different types of experiments, and are presented in a single software interface that is usable in an AI agent. We evaluate the approach on various objectives in experiment analysis, and show that the framework improves code correctness, reduces lines of code, and is more performant than a baseline analysis constructed by a vanilla agent.

Related papers

• AgentForge: An Immersive Role-Playing Platform for Learning Agentic Software Engineering [4.609790123179083]
  We present textitAgentForge, an immersive learning system in which novices take on one of four software-engineering roles.<n>In each practice session, novices perform their chosen role while AI agents perform the remaining three.<n>In a study with 37 novice developers, participants achieved high task-completion rates with AI-agent support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T18:58:18Z)
• MAS-Algorithm: A Workflow for Solving Algorithmic Programming Problems with a Multi-Agent System [15.213043425523287]
  MAS-Algorithm is a systematic multi-agent workflow for algorithmic problem solving inspired by competitive programmers and algorithm engineers.<n>Our framework decomposes the end-to-end solving process into modular stages, enabling structured reasoning, tool integration, and flexible coordination among agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T09:57:53Z)
• Simple Agents Outperform Experts in Biomedical Imaging Workflow Optimization [69.36509281190662]
  Adapting production-level computer vision tools to bespoke scientific datasets is a critical "last mile" bottleneck.<n>We consider using AI agents to automate this manual coding, and focus on the open question of optimal agent design.<n>We demonstrate that a simple agent framework consistently generates adaptation code that outperforms human-expert solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T18:42:26Z)
• Barbarians at the Gate: How AI is Upending Systems Research [58.95406995634148]
  We argue that systems research, long focused on designing and evaluating new performance-oriented algorithms, is particularly well-suited for AI-driven solution discovery.<n>We term this approach as AI-Driven Research for Systems ( ADRS), which iteratively generates, evaluates, and refines solutions.<n>Our results highlight both the disruptive potential and the urgent need to adapt systems research practices in the age of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T17:49:24Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• Scalable, Symbiotic, AI and Non-AI Agent Based Parallel Discrete Event Simulations [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel parallel discrete event simulation (PDES) based methodology to combine multiple AI and non-AI agents.<n>We evaluate our approach by solving four problems from four different domains and comparing the results with those from AI models alone.<n>Results show that overall accuracy of our approach is 68% where as the accuracy of vanilla models is less than 23%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:50:01Z)
• Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI [0.36868085124383626]
  Review presents a comprehensive analysis of two emerging paradigms in AI-assisted software development: vibe coding and agentic coding.<n> Vibe coding emphasizes intuitive, human-in-the-loop interaction through prompt-based, conversational interaction.<n>Agentic coding enables autonomous software development through goal-driven agents capable of planning, executing, testing, and iterating tasks with minimal human intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T03:00:21Z)
• TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks [55.03911355902567]
  We introduce TheAgentCompany, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents that interact with the world in similar ways to those of a digital worker.<n>We find that the most competitive agent can complete 30% of tasks autonomously.<n>This paints a nuanced picture on task automation with simulating LM agents in a setting a real workplace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T18:55:40Z)
• Contractual Reinforcement Learning: Pulling Arms with Invisible Hands [68.77645200579181]
  We propose a theoretical framework for aligning economic interests of different stakeholders in the online learning problems through contract design. For the planning problem, we design an efficient dynamic programming algorithm to determine the optimal contracts against the far-sighted agent. For the learning problem, we introduce a generic design of no-regret learning algorithms to untangle the challenges from robust design of contracts to the balance of exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T16:53:00Z)
• Pangu-Agent: A Fine-Tunable Generalist Agent with Structured Reasoning [50.47568731994238]
  Key method for creating Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents is Reinforcement Learning (RL) This paper presents a general framework model for integrating and learning structured reasoning into AI agents' policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T17:57:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.