SpecRLBench: A Benchmark for Generalization in Specification-Guided Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24729v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:40:18 GMT
• Title: SpecRLBench: A Benchmark for Generalization in Specification-Guided Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: Specification-guided reinforcement learning (RL) provides a principled framework for encoding complex, temporally extended tasks.<n>We introduce SpecRLBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities of generalization-based RL methods.
• Score: 4.819678320271634
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Specification-guided reinforcement learning (RL) provides a principled framework for encoding complex, temporally extended tasks using formal specifications such as linear temporal logic (LTL). While recent methods have shown promising results, their ability to generalize across unseen specifications and diverse environments remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we introduce SpecRLBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the generalization capabilities of LTL-based specification-guided RL methods. The benchmark spans multiple difficulty levels across navigation and manipulation domains, incorporating both static and dynamic environments, diverse robot dynamics, and varied observation modalities. Through extensive empirical evaluation, we characterize the strengths and limitations of existing approaches and reveal the challenges that emerge as specification and environment complexity increase. SpecRLBench provides a structured platform for systematic comparison and supports the development of more generalizable specification-guided RL methods. Code is available at https://github.com/BU-DEPEND-Lab/SpecRLBench.

Related papers

• ShapeBench: A Scalable Benchmark and Diagnostic Suite for Standardized Evaluation in Aerodynamic Shape Optimization [9.151054983399924]
  We introduce ShapeBench, an open-source ASO benchmark with a unified API spanning 103 tasks across eight categories shape and multiple optimization regimes.<n>Each ShapeBench task includes a validated surrogate for fast search, enabling systematic fidelity-gap analysis.<n>Results on ShapeBench demonstrate substantial variance in rankings across shape categories and problem formulations, with mean pairwise Spearman $= 0.013$, so single-task conclusions do not reliably generalize across problem classes.<n>The benchmark is also far from saturation; classical methods are rarely applicable across all shape categories and tasks, further highlighting the need for more general-purpose approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T06:05:57Z)
• Enhancing RL Generalizability in Robotics through SHAP Analysis of Algorithms and Hyperparameters [4.978287867181505]
  We propose an explainable framework that evaluates Reinforcement Learning performance across robotic environments.<n>We empirically analyze configuration impact patterns, and introduce SHAP-guided configuration selection to enhance generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T17:41:04Z)
• Zero-Shot Instruction Following in RL via Structured LTL Representations [50.41415009303967]
  We study instruction following in multi-task reinforcement learning, where an agent must zero-shot execute novel tasks not seen during training.<n>In this setting, linear temporal logic has recently been adopted as a powerful framework for specifying structured, temporally extended tasks.<n>While existing approaches successfully train generalist policies, they often struggle to effectively capture the rich logical and temporal structure inherent in specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T23:22:50Z)
• Sample-Efficient Neurosymbolic Deep Reinforcement Learning [49.60927398960061]
  We propose a neuro-symbolic Deep RL approach that integrates background symbolic knowledge to improve sample efficiency.<n>Online reasoning is performed to guide the training process through two mechanisms.<n>We show improved performance over a state-of-the-art reward machine baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T09:28:53Z)
• Zero-Shot Instruction Following in RL via Structured LTL Representations [54.08661695738909]
  Linear temporal logic (LTL) is a compelling framework for specifying complex, structured tasks for reinforcement learning (RL) agents.<n>Recent work has shown that interpreting instructions as finite automata, which can be seen as high-level programs monitoring task progress, enables learning a single generalist policy capable of executing arbitrary instructions at test time.<n>We propose a novel approach to learning a multi-task policy for following arbitrary instructions that addresses this shortcoming.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T10:44:51Z)
• Part I: Tricks or Traps? A Deep Dive into RL for LLM Reasoning [53.85659415230589]
  This paper systematically reviews widely adoptedReinforcement learning techniques.<n>We present clear guidelines for selecting RL techniques tailored to specific setups.<n>We also reveal that a minimalist combination of two techniques can unlock the learning capability of critic-free policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T17:39:45Z)
• Discrete Tokenization for Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Survey [69.45421620616486]
  This work presents the first structured taxonomy and analysis of discrete tokenization methods designed for large language models (LLMs)<n>We categorize 8 representative VQ variants that span classical and modern paradigms and analyze their algorithmic principles, training dynamics, and integration challenges with LLM pipelines.<n>We identify key challenges including codebook collapse, unstable gradient estimation, and modality-specific encoding constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T10:52:14Z)
• BLADE: Benchmark suite for LLM-driven Automated Design and Evolution of iterative optimisation heuristics [2.2485774453793037]
  BLADE is a framework for benchmarking LLM-driven AAD methods in a continuous black-box optimisation context.<n>It integrates benchmark problems with instance generators and textual descriptions aimed at capability-focused testing, such as specialisation and information exploitation.<n> BLADE provides an out-of-the-box' solution to systematically evaluate LLM-driven AAD approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T18:34:09Z)
• Adapting to Non-Stationary Environments: Multi-Armed Bandit Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Knowledge Graphs [23.357843519762483]
  Recent studies have demonstrated that leveraging the Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework, combined with Knowledge Graphs, robustly enhances the reasoning capabilities of Large language models.<n>We introduce a Multi-objective Multi-Armed Bandit enhanced RAG framework, supported by multiple retrieval methods with diverse capabilities.<n>Our method significantly outperforms baseline methods in non-stationary settings while achieving state-of-the-art performance in stationary environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T15:56:03Z)
• Contextualize Me -- The Case for Context in Reinforcement Learning [49.794253971446416]
  Contextual Reinforcement Learning (cRL) provides a framework to model such changes in a principled manner. We show how cRL contributes to improving zero-shot generalization in RL through meaningful benchmarks and structured reasoning about generalization tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T15:01:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.