CogRAG+: Cognitive-Level Guided Diagnosis and Remediation of Memory and Reasoning Deficiencies in Professional Exam QA

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25928v1
• Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:31:12 GMT
• Title: CogRAG+: Cognitive-Level Guided Diagnosis and Remediation of Memory and Reasoning Deficiencies in Professional Exam QA
• Abstract summary: CogRAG+ is a training-free framework that decouples and aligns the retrieval-augmented generation pipeline with human cognitive hierarchies.<n>We show that CogRAG+ consistently outperforms general-purpose models and standard RAG methods on the Registered Dietitian qualification exam.
• Score: 13.324231386098042
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Professional domain knowledge underpins human civilization, serving as both the basis for industry entry and the core of complex decision-making and problem-solving. However, existing large language models often suffer from opaque inference processes in which retrieval and reasoning are tightly entangled, causing knowledge gaps and reasoning inconsistencies in professional tasks. To address this, we propose CogRAG+, a training-free framework that decouples and aligns the retrieval-augmented generation pipeline with human cognitive hierarchies. First, we introduce Reinforced Retrieval, a judge-driven dual-path strategy with fact-centric and option-centric paths that strengthens retrieval and mitigates cascading failures caused by missing foundational knowledge. We then develop cognition-stratified Constrained Reasoning, which replaces unconstrained chain-of-thought generation with structured templates to reduce logical inconsistency and generative redundancy. Experiments on two representative models, Qwen3-8B and Llama3.1-8B, show that CogRAG+ consistently outperforms general-purpose models and standard RAG methods on the Registered Dietitian qualification exam. In single-question mode, it raises overall accuracy to 85.8\% for Qwen3-8B and 60.3\% for Llama3.1-8B, with clear gains over vanilla baselines. Constrained Reasoning also reduces the unanswered rate from 7.6\% to 1.4\%. CogRAG+ offers a robust, model-agnostic path toward training-free expert-level performance in specialized domains.

Related papers

• Cognitive Demand Steering for Adaptive Meta-Reasoning in Large Language Models [12.235165912578095]
  Cognitive Demand Steering is a training-free meta-reasoning framework equipped with residual demand assessment.<n>Averaged across three frontier LLMs and six reasoning benchmarks, CDS improves accuracy by $21.9%$ over direct calls and $9%$ over standard CoT reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-02T15:41:12Z)
• Learning to Reason by Analogy via Retrieval-Augmented Reinforcement Fine-Tuning [20.897370477958734]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a standard mechanism for grounding language models in external knowledge.<n>We propose Retrieval-Augmented Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RA-RFT), a framework that teaches language models to reason by analogy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-11T17:59:52Z)
• Metacognition as Reward: Reinforcing LLM Reasoning via Knowledge and Regulation Signals [75.25256166997414]
  We introduce Metacognition-as-Reward (MaR), a metacognition-inspired RL framework.<n>MaR guides reasoning through two general process dimensions.<n>MaR consistently improves model performance, achieving up to a 7.7% gain over the base model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T08:54:37Z)
• Reason and Verify: A Framework for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation [0.0]
  We propose a domain-specific RAG framework that integrates explicit rea- soning and faithfulness verification.<n>Our architecture augments standard retrieval with neural query rewriting, BGE-based cross-encoder reranking, and a rationale generation module.<n>We evaluate this framework on the BioASQ and PubMedQA benchmarks, specifically analyzing the impact of dynamic in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-10T18:25:07Z)
• R-Align: Enhancing Generative Reward Models through Rationale-Centric Meta-Judging [69.96389360650072]
  We show that reasoning fidelity is highly predictive of downstream RLHF outcomes, beyond standard label accuracy.<n>We propose Rationale-Centric Alignment, R-Align, which augments training with gold judgments and explicitly supervises rationale alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T15:17:11Z)
• Evaluating and Enhancing the Vulnerability Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models [15.849480549367684]
  We propose DAGVul, a novel framework that models vulnerability reasoning as a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) generation task.<n>By further introducing Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), we align model reasoning trace with program-intrinsic logic.<n>Our framework improves the reasoning F1-score by an average of 18.9% over all the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T13:19:45Z)
• Search-R2: Enhancing Search-Integrated Reasoning via Actor-Refiner Collaboration [49.9937230730202]
  We propose Search-R2, a novel Actor-Refiner collaboration framework that enhances reasoning through targeted intervention.<n>Our approach decomposes the generation process into an Actor, which produces initial reasoning trajectories.<n>We show that Search-R2 consistently outperforms strong RAG and RL-based baselines across model scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T15:32:09Z)
• CoG: Controllable Graph Reasoning via Relational Blueprints and Failure-Aware Refinement over Knowledge Graphs [53.199517625701475]
  CoG is a training-free framework inspired by Dual-Process Theory that mimics the interplay between intuition and deliberation.<n>CoG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in both accuracy and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T07:27:40Z)
• TreePS-RAG: Tree-based Process Supervision for Reinforcement Learning in Agentic RAG [71.06073770344732]
  Agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) formulates question answering as a multi-step interaction between reasoning and information retrieval.<n>We present TreePS-RAG, an online, tree-based RL framework for agentic RAG that enables step-wise credit assignment while retaining outcome-only rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T14:07:30Z)
• LIR$^3$AG: A Lightweight Rerank Reasoning Strategy Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [12.734342155120979]
  We study reasoning strategies for reasoning models in RAG multi-hop QA tasks.<n>Our findings reveal that reasoning models adopt structured strategies to integrate retrieved and internal knowledge.<n>We propose a novel Lightweight Rerank Reasoning Strategy Framework for RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-20T11:53:37Z)
• From Sufficiency to Reflection: Reinforcement-Guided Thinking Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning for LLMs [13.410543801811992]
  This paper analyzes existing RAG reasoning models and identifies three main failure patterns.<n>We propose TIRESRAG-R1, a novel framework using a think-retrieve-reflect process and a multi-dimensional reward system.<n>Experiments on four multi-hop QA datasets show that TIRESRAG-R1 outperforms prior RAG methods and generalizes well to single-hop tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T14:29:44Z)
• Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.