LLMs Generate Kitsch

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25929v1
• Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 16:13:09 GMT
• Title: LLMs Generate Kitsch
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate works that have traditionally required human creativity.<n>We argue that LLMs systematically generate kitsch, and that this is a consequence of the way in which they are trained.<n>We discuss implications for the design of future studies and for creative tasks such as research and coding.
• Score: 48.874548120501835
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate pictures, texts, music, videos, and other works that have traditionally required human creativity. LLM-generated artifacts are often rated better than human-generated works in controlled studies. At the same time, they can come across as generic and hollow. We propose to resolve this tension by arguing that LLMs systematically generate kitsch, and that this is a consequence of the way in which they are trained. We also show empirically that readers perceive LLM-generated stories as kitschier, if we control for their definition of "kitsch". We discuss implications for the design of future studies and for creative tasks such as research and coding.

Related papers

• Should You Use Your Large Language Model to Explore or Exploit? [57.98066234509361]
  We evaluate the ability of large language models to help a decision-making agent facing an exploration-exploitation tradeoff.<n>We find that while the current LLMs often struggle to exploit, in-context mitigations may be used to substantially improve performance for small-scale tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T23:42:53Z)
• We're Different, We're the Same: Creative Homogeneity Across LLMs [6.532204241949196]
  Large language models (LLMs) are now available for use as writing support tools, idea generators, and beyond.<n>Several works have shown that using an LLM as a creative partner results in a narrower set of creative outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T18:12:41Z)
• Large Language Models show both individual and collective creativity comparable to humans [39.90254321453145]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) show creativity comparable to humans.<n>We benchmark the LLMs against individual humans, and also take a novel approach by comparing them to the collective creativity of groups of humans.<n>When questioned 10 times, an LLM's collective creativity is equivalent to 8-10 humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-04T09:18:54Z)
• HoLLMwood: Unleashing the Creativity of Large Language Models in Screenwriting via Role Playing [45.95600225239927]
  Large language models (LLMs) can hardly produce written works at the level of human experts due to the extremely high complexity of literature writing. We present HoLLMwood, an automated framework for unleashing the creativity of LLMs and exploring their potential in screenwriting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T16:01:33Z)
• See the Unseen: Better Context-Consistent Knowledge-Editing by Noises [73.54237379082795]
  Knowledge-editing updates knowledge of large language models (LLMs) Existing works ignore this property and the editing lacks generalization. We empirically find that the effects of different contexts upon LLMs in recalling the same knowledge follow a Gaussian-like distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T09:09:14Z)
• Are Language Models More Like Libraries or Like Librarians? Bibliotechnism, the Novel Reference Problem, and the Attitudes of LLMs [12.568491518122622]
  We argue that bibliotechnism faces an independent challenge from examples in which LLMs generate novel reference. According to interpretationism in the philosophy of mind, a system has such attitudes if and only if its behavior is well explained by the hypothesis that it does. We emphasize, however, that interpretationism is compatible with very simple creatures having attitudes and differs sharply from views that presuppose these attitudes require consciousness, sentience, or intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T00:05:45Z)
• AlignedCoT: Prompting Large Language Models via Native-Speaking Demonstrations [52.43593893122206]
  Alignedcot is an in-context learning technique for invoking Large Language Models. It achieves consistent and correct step-wise prompts in zero-shot scenarios. We conduct experiments on mathematical reasoning and commonsense reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T17:24:21Z)
• The ART of LLM Refinement: Ask, Refine, and Trust [85.75059530612882]
  We propose a reasoning with refinement objective called ART: Ask, Refine, and Trust. It asks necessary questions to decide when an LLM should refine its output. It achieves a performance gain of +5 points over self-refinement baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T07:26:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.