Meta-Learning and Targeted Differential Privacy to Improve the Accuracy-Privacy Trade-off in Recommendations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26390v1
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 08:00:20 GMT
- Title: Meta-Learning and Targeted Differential Privacy to Improve the Accuracy-Privacy Trade-off in Recommendations
- Abstract summary: Balancing differential privacy with recommendation accuracy is a key challenge in privacy-preserving recommender systems.<n>We address this trade-off at both the data and model levels.<n>We use meta-learning to improve robustness to remaining DP-noise.
- Score: 8.550044487436132
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Balancing differential privacy (DP) with recommendation accuracy is a key challenge in privacy-preserving recommender systems, since DP-noise degrades accuracy. We address this trade-off at both the data and model levels. At the data level, we apply DP only to the most stereotypical user data likely to reveal sensitive attributes, such as gender or age, to reduce unnecessary perturbation; we refer to this as targeted DP. At the model level, we use meta-learning to improve robustness to remaining DP-noise. This achieves a better trade-off between accuracy and privacy than standard approaches: Meta-learning improves accuracy and targeted DP leads to lower empirical privacy risk compared to uniformly applied DP and full DP baselines. Overall, our findings show that selectively applying DP at the data level together with meta-learning at the model level can effectively balance recommendation accuracy and user privacy.
Related papers
- Efficient Public Verification of Private ML via Regularization [28.223507127499115]
Training with differential privacy (DP) provides a guarantee to members in a dataset that they cannot be identified by users of the released model.<n>The amount of compute needed to verify DP guarantees for current algorithms scales with the amount of compute required to train the model.<n>We show we can obtain tight privacy-utility trade-offs by privately minimizing a series of regularized objectives and only using the standard DP composition bound.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-03T17:46:16Z) - DP-AdamW: Investigating Decoupled Weight Decay and Bias Correction in Private Deep Learning [0.0]
differential privacy offers formal guarantees to protect against information leakage during model training.<n>Recent advances introduced ever more efficients, with AdamW being a popular choice for training deep learning models because of strong empirical performance.<n>We find that DP-AdamW outperforms existing state-of-the-art differentially privates like DP-SGD, DP-Adam, and DP-AdamBC, scoring over 15% higher on text classification, up to 5% higher on image classification, and consistently 1% higher on graph node classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-11T05:24:30Z) - Machine Learning with Privacy for Protected Attributes [56.44253915927481]
We refine the definition of differential privacy (DP) to create a more general and flexible framework that we call feature differential privacy (FDP)<n>Our definition is simulation-based and allows for both addition/removal and replacement variants of privacy, and can handle arbitrary separation of protected and non-protected features.<n>We apply our framework to various machine learning tasks and show that it can significantly improve the utility of DP-trained models when public features are available.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-24T17:53:28Z) - DiSK: Differentially Private Optimizer with Simplified Kalman Filter for Noise Reduction [57.83978915843095]
This paper introduces DiSK, a novel framework designed to significantly enhance the performance of differentially private gradients.<n>To ensure practicality for large-scale training, we simplify the Kalman filtering process, minimizing its memory and computational demands.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T19:30:39Z) - Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit.
We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z) - Noise-Aware Differentially Private Regression via Meta-Learning [25.14514068630219]
Differential Privacy (DP) is the gold standard for protecting user privacy, but standard DP mechanisms significantly impair performance.<n>One approach to mitigating this issue is pre-training models on simulated data before DP learning on the private data.<n>In this work we go a step further, using simulated data to train a meta-learning model that combines the Convolutional Conditional Neural Process (ConvCNP) with an improved functional DP mechanism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-12T18:11:24Z) - Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Data [54.943023722114134]
differential privacy (DP) is a prominent method to gauge the degree of security provided to the models.
DP is yet not capable of protecting a substantial portion of the data used during the initial pre-training stage.
We develop a novel DP continual pre-training strategy using only 10% of public data.
Our strategy can achieve DP accuracy of 41.5% on ImageNet-21k, as well as non-DP accuracy of 55.7% and and 60.0% on downstream tasks Places365 and iNaturalist-2021.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T23:26:27Z) - Conciliating Privacy and Utility in Data Releases via Individual Differential Privacy and Microaggregation [4.287502453001108]
$epsilon$-Differential privacy (DP) is a well-known privacy model that offers strong privacy guarantees.
We propose $epsilon$-individual differential privacy (iDP), which causes less data distortion while providing the same protection as DP to subjects.
We report on experiments that show how our approach can provide strong privacy (small $epsilon$) while yielding protected data that do not significantly degrade the accuracy of secondary data analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T10:23:18Z) - Sparsity-Preserving Differentially Private Training of Large Embedding
Models [67.29926605156788]
DP-SGD is a training algorithm that combines differential privacy with gradient descent.
Applying DP-SGD naively to embedding models can destroy gradient sparsity, leading to reduced training efficiency.
We present two new algorithms, DP-FEST and DP-AdaFEST, that preserve gradient sparsity during private training of large embedding models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T17:59:51Z) - DPIS: An Enhanced Mechanism for Differentially Private SGD with Importance Sampling [23.8561225168394]
differential privacy (DP) has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection, and deep neural networks (DNN) have been immensely successful in machine learning.
A classic mechanism for this purpose is DP-SGD, which is a differentially private version of the gradient descent (SGD) commonly used for training.
We propose DPIS, a novel mechanism for differentially private SGD training that can be used as a drop-in replacement of the core of DP-SGD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-18T07:03:14Z) - Large Scale Transfer Learning for Differentially Private Image
Classification [51.10365553035979]
Differential Privacy (DP) provides a formal framework for training machine learning models with individual example level privacy.
Private training using DP-SGD protects against leakage by injecting noise into individual example gradients.
While this result is quite appealing, the computational cost of training large-scale models with DP-SGD is substantially higher than non-private training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-06T01:22:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.