Sentiment Analysis of AI Adoption in Indonesian Higher Education Using Machine Learning and Transformer-Based Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27439v1
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 05:25:05 GMT
- Title: Sentiment Analysis of AI Adoption in Indonesian Higher Education Using Machine Learning and Transformer-Based Models
- Abstract summary: This study analyzes Indonesian student opinions on the adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education.<n>The dataset consists of 2,295 labeled samples, combining 1,154 student opinions with additional lexical sentiment data.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This study analyzes Indonesian student opinions on the adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education using two approaches: TF-IDF-based machine learning and Transformer-based deep learning. The dataset consists of 2,295 labeled samples, combining 1,154 student opinions with additional lexical sentiment data. LightGBM, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) are evaluated as machine learning models, while DistilBERT is fine-tuned for binary sentiment classification. The results show that SVM achieves the best performance among the machine learning models with 82.14% test accuracy and F1-score, while DistilBERT performs best overall with 84.78% accuracy and 84.75% F1-score. These findings indicate that Transformer-based models better capture contextual information, although SVM remains a competitive and efficient alternative for sentiment classification.
Related papers
- Benchmarking LightGBM and BiLSTM for Sentiment Analysis on Indonesian E-Commerce Reviews [0.0]
The evaluation is conducted on a sentiment analysis task using an Indonesian e-commerce review dataset sourced from Hugging Face.<n>The BiLSTM architecture is highly capable of capturing the sequential context of Indonesian review texts, making it the superior model for this specific classification task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-02T08:38:18Z) - Benchmarking PyCaret AutoML Against BiLSTM for Fine-Grained Emotion Classification: A Comparative Study on 20-Class Emotion Detection [0.0]
This study benchmarks classical machine learning and deep learning approaches for 20-class emotion classification.<n>The results show that BiLSTM achieves the best overall performance with 89% accuracy and a weighted F1-score of 0.89.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-29T05:31:45Z) - AI Generated Text Detection [0.0]
This paper presents an evaluation of AI text detection methods, including both traditional machine learning models and transformer-based architectures.<n>We utilize two datasets, HC3 and DAIGT v2, to build a unified benchmark and apply a topic-based data split to prevent information leakage.<n>Results indicate that contextual modeling is significantly superior to lexical features and highlight the importance of mitigating topic memorization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T11:18:10Z) - Automated Analysis of Learning Outcomes and Exam Questions Based on Bloom's Taxonomy [0.0]
This paper explores the automatic classification of exam questions and learning outcomes according to Bloom's taxonomy.<n>A small dataset of 600 sentences labeled with six cognitive categories was processed using traditional machine learning (ML) models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-14T02:31:12Z) - Strengthening False Information Propagation Detection: Leveraging SVM and Sophisticated Text Vectorization Techniques in comparison to BERT [0.0]
This study explores the utilization of machine learning and natural language processing, specifically Support Vector Machines (SVM) and BERT, to detect fake news.<n>We employ three distinct text vectorization methods for SVM: Term Frequency Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), Word2Vec, and Bag of Words (BoW)<n>We compare these methods against the transformer large language model, BERT, to determine the most effective techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-19T18:15:46Z) - GuReT: Distinguishing Guilt and Regret related Text [44.740281698788166]
This paper introduces a dataset tailored to dissect the relationship between guilt and regret and their unique textual markers.
Our approach treats guilt and regret recognition as a binary classification task and employs three machine learning and six transformer-based deep learning techniques to benchmark the newly created dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T20:20:44Z) - Robust Learning with Progressive Data Expansion Against Spurious
Correlation [65.83104529677234]
We study the learning process of a two-layer nonlinear convolutional neural network in the presence of spurious features.
Our analysis suggests that imbalanced data groups and easily learnable spurious features can lead to the dominance of spurious features during the learning process.
We propose a new training algorithm called PDE that efficiently enhances the model's robustness for a better worst-group performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T05:44:06Z) - Transformer-based approaches to Sentiment Detection [55.41644538483948]
We examined the performance of four different types of state-of-the-art transformer models for text classification.
The RoBERTa transformer model performs best on the test dataset with a score of 82.6% and is highly recommended for quality predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-13T17:12:03Z) - Incremental Online Learning Algorithms Comparison for Gesture and Visual
Smart Sensors [68.8204255655161]
This paper compares four state-of-the-art algorithms in two real applications: gesture recognition based on accelerometer data and image classification.
Our results confirm these systems' reliability and the feasibility of deploying them in tiny-memory MCUs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-01T17:05:20Z) - Scaling Vision Transformers [82.08465256393514]
We study how Vision Transformers scale and characterize the relationships between error rate, data, and compute.
We train a ViT model with two billion parameters, which attains a new state-of-the-art on ImageNet of 90.45% top-1 accuracy.
The model also performs well on few-shot learning, for example, attaining 84.86% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet with only 10 examples per class.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-08T17:47:39Z) - Vision Transformers are Robust Learners [65.91359312429147]
We study the robustness of the Vision Transformer (ViT) against common corruptions and perturbations, distribution shifts, and natural adversarial examples.
We present analyses that provide both quantitative and qualitative indications to explain why ViTs are indeed more robust learners.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-17T02:39:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.