Defending Quantum Classifiers against Adversarial Perturbations through Quantum Autoencoders
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.28176v1
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:56:40 GMT
- Title: Defending Quantum Classifiers against Adversarial Perturbations through Quantum Autoencoders
- Abstract summary: A quantum autoencoder is used to purify the adversarial samples through reconstruction.<n>Our framework can significantly outperform state-of-the-art in prediction accuracy (up to 68%) under adversarial attacks.
- Score: 2.37685358666088
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Machine learning models can learn from data samples to carry out various tasks efficiently. When data samples are adversarially manipulated, such as by insertion of carefully crafted noise, it can cause the model to make mistakes. Quantum machine learning models are also vulnerable to such adversarial attacks, especially in image classification using variational quantum classifiers. While there are promising defenses against these adversarial perturbations, such as training with adversarial samples, they face practical limitations. For example, they are not applicable in scenarios where training with adversarial samples is either not possible or can overfit the models on one type of attack. In this paper, we propose an adversarial training-free defense framework that utilizes a quantum autoencoder to purify the adversarial samples through reconstruction. Moreover, our defense framework provides a confidence metric to identify potentially adversarial samples that cannot be purified the quantum autoencoder. Extensive evaluation demonstrates that our defense framework can significantly outperform state-of-the-art in prediction accuracy (up to 68%) under adversarial attacks.
Related papers
- Unlearning Backdoor Threats: Enhancing Backdoor Defense in Multimodal Contrastive Learning via Local Token Unlearning [49.242828934501986]
Multimodal contrastive learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for building high-quality features.
backdoor attacks subtly embed malicious behaviors within the model during training.
We introduce an innovative token-based localized forgetting training regime.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-24T18:33:15Z) - Understanding the Robustness of Randomized Feature Defense Against
Query-Based Adversarial Attacks [23.010308600769545]
Deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples that find samples close to the original image but can make the model misclassify.
We propose a simple and lightweight defense against black-box attacks by adding random noise to hidden features at intermediate layers of the model at inference time.
Our method effectively enhances the model's resilience against both score-based and decision-based black-box attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-01T03:53:23Z) - Identifying Adversarially Attackable and Robust Samples [1.4213973379473654]
Adrial attacks insert small, imperceptible perturbations to input samples that cause large, undesired changes to the output of deep learning models.
This work introduces the notion of sample attackability, where we aim to identify samples that are most susceptible to adversarial attacks.
We propose a deep-learning-based detector to identify the adversarially attackable and robust samples in an unseen dataset for an unseen target model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-30T13:58:14Z) - Towards Generating Adversarial Examples on Mixed-type Data [32.41305735919529]
We propose a novel attack algorithm M-Attack, which can effectively generate adversarial examples in mixed-type data.
Based on M-Attack, attackers can attempt to mislead the targeted classification model's prediction, by only slightly perturbing both the numerical and categorical features in the given data samples.
Our generated adversarial examples can evade potential detection models, which makes the attack indeed insidious.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-17T20:17:21Z) - Qu-ANTI-zation: Exploiting Quantization Artifacts for Achieving
Adversarial Outcomes [5.865029600972316]
Quantization is a technique that transforms the parameter representation of a neural network from floating-point numbers into lower-precision ones.
We propose a new training framework to implement adversarial quantization outcomes.
We show that a single compromised model defeats multiple quantization schemes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-26T10:09:49Z) - Towards A Conceptually Simple Defensive Approach for Few-shot
classifiers Against Adversarial Support Samples [107.38834819682315]
We study a conceptually simple approach to defend few-shot classifiers against adversarial attacks.
We propose a simple attack-agnostic detection method, using the concept of self-similarity and filtering.
Our evaluation on the miniImagenet (MI) and CUB datasets exhibit good attack detection performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-24T05:46:03Z) - Learning and Certification under Instance-targeted Poisoning [49.55596073963654]
We study PAC learnability and certification under instance-targeted poisoning attacks.
We show that when the budget of the adversary scales sublinearly with the sample complexity, PAC learnability and certification are achievable.
We empirically study the robustness of K nearest neighbour, logistic regression, multi-layer perceptron, and convolutional neural network on real data sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-18T17:48:15Z) - Defence against adversarial attacks using classical and quantum-enhanced
Boltzmann machines [64.62510681492994]
generative models attempt to learn the distribution underlying a dataset, making them inherently more robust to small perturbations.
We find improvements ranging from 5% to 72% against attacks with Boltzmann machines on the MNIST dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-21T19:00:03Z) - Learning to Separate Clusters of Adversarial Representations for Robust
Adversarial Detection [50.03939695025513]
We propose a new probabilistic adversarial detector motivated by a recently introduced non-robust feature.
In this paper, we consider the non-robust features as a common property of adversarial examples, and we deduce it is possible to find a cluster in representation space corresponding to the property.
This idea leads us to probability estimate distribution of adversarial representations in a separate cluster, and leverage the distribution for a likelihood based adversarial detector.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-07T07:21:18Z) - Practical No-box Adversarial Attacks against DNNs [31.808770437120536]
We investigate no-box adversarial examples, where the attacker can neither access the model information or the training set nor query the model.
We propose three mechanisms for training with a very small dataset and find that prototypical reconstruction is the most effective.
Our approach significantly diminishes the average prediction accuracy of the system to only 15.40%, which is on par with the attack that transfers adversarial examples from a pre-trained Arcface model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-04T11:10:03Z) - Adversarial Example Games [51.92698856933169]
Adrial Example Games (AEG) is a framework that models the crafting of adversarial examples.
AEG provides a new way to design adversarial examples by adversarially training a generator and aversa from a given hypothesis class.
We demonstrate the efficacy of AEG on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-01T19:47:23Z) - A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustness [105.88250594033053]
Adversarial examples can cause catastrophic mistakes in Deep Neural Network (DNNs) based vision systems.
This paper proposes a self-supervised adversarial training mechanism in the input space.
It provides significant robustness against the textbfunseen adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-08T20:42:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.