Sentiment Analysis of Mobile Legends App Reviews Using Machine Learning and LSTM-Based Deep Learning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01317v1
• Date: Sat, 02 May 2026 08:25:59 GMT
• Title: Sentiment Analysis of Mobile Legends App Reviews Using Machine Learning and LSTM-Based Deep Learning Models
• Abstract summary: This paper compares Machine Learning and LSTM-based Deep Learning methods for sentiment analysis of Mobile Legends app reviews.<n>Using a dataset of 10,000 reviews labeled as positive, negative, and neutral, the study evaluates traditional models with TF-IDF and PyCaret AutoML and compares them against an LSTM model designed to capture sequential text dependencies.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper compares Machine Learning and LSTM-based Deep Learning methods for sentiment analysis of Mobile Legends app reviews. Using a dataset of 10,000 reviews labeled as positive, negative, and neutral, the study evaluates traditional models with TF-IDF and PyCaret AutoML and compares them against an LSTM model designed to capture sequential text dependencies. The results show that the LSTM model outperforms the classical Machine Learning baselines, achieving 92% accuracy and a weighted F1-score of 91%. The findings indicate that deep learning is more effective for handling informal and context-dependent user review text.

Related papers

• Unveiling Public Opinion: A Study of Sentiment Analysis Using LSTM and Traditional Models [0.3655021726150367]
  Sentiment analysis on Twitter employs sophisticated computational techniques to categorize tweets into positive, negative, or neutral sentiments.<n>This paper examines the effectiveness of various machine learning and deep learning approaches.<n>It identifies the optimal sentiment analysis model using a Kaggle Twitter dataset that has been preprocessed through tokenization, lemmatization, and stopword elimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T16:32:39Z)
• A Comparative Analysis of Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Sentiment Classification on IMDb Movie Reviews [0.0]
  This paper presents a comparative study of classical machine learning and deep learning methods for sentiment classification on the IMDb movie reviews dataset.<n>The machine learning pipeline uses TF-IDF features and PyCaret AutoML to evaluate Logistic Regression, Nave Bayes, and Support Vector Machine.<n>The deep learning pipeline implements BiLSTM and BiLSTM with an attention mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T14:44:36Z)
• A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Tweet Sentiment Classification: A Case Study on the Sentiment140 Dataset [1.125921430041183]
  This study compares a Logistic Regression model using TF-IDF features with a deep learning Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory architecture on a 10,000-tweet subset of the Sentiment140 dataset.<n> Experimental results show that Logistic Regression outperformed BiLSTM, achieving an accuracy of 73.5% compared with 69.17%, while the deep learning model exhibited mild overfitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T13:21:07Z)
• Benchmarking LightGBM and BiLSTM for Sentiment Analysis on Indonesian E-Commerce Reviews [0.0]
  The evaluation is conducted on a sentiment analysis task using an Indonesian e-commerce review dataset sourced from Hugging Face.<n>The BiLSTM architecture is highly capable of capturing the sequential context of Indonesian review texts, making it the superior model for this specific classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T08:38:18Z)
• Text-Based Approaches to Item Difficulty Modeling in Large-Scale Assessments: A Systematic Review [18.045716459188366]
  Item difficulty plays a crucial role in test performance, interpretability of scores, and equity for all test-takers, especially in large-scale assessments.<n>Traditional approaches to item difficulty modeling rely on field testing and classical test theory (CTT)-based item analysis or item response theory (IRT) calibration.<n>This paper reviews and synthesizes 37 articles on automated item difficulty prediction in large-scale assessment settings published through May 2025.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T20:19:39Z)
• Benchmarking ChatGPT and DeepSeek in April 2025: A Novel Dual Perspective Sentiment Analysis Using Lexicon-Based and Deep Learning Approaches [1.4968127458030251]
  This study presents a novel dual-perspective approach to analyzing user reviews for ChatGPT and DeepSeek on the Google Play Store.<n>It integrates lexicon-based sentiment analysis (TextBlob) with deep learning classification models, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory (Bi LSTM) Networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T20:58:10Z)
• LecEval: An Automated Metric for Multimodal Knowledge Acquisition in Multimedia Learning [58.98865450345401]
  We introduce LecEval, an automated metric grounded in Mayer's Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning.<n>LecEval assesses effectiveness using four rubrics: Content Relevance (CR), Expressive Clarity (EC), Logical Structure (LS) and Audience Engagement (AE)<n>We curate a large-scale dataset of over 2,000 slides from more than 50 online course videos, annotated with fine-grained human ratings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-04T12:06:47Z)
• If an LLM Were a Character, Would It Know Its Own Story? Evaluating Lifelong Learning in LLMs [55.8331366739144]
  We introduce LIFESTATE-BENCH, a benchmark designed to assess lifelong learning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our fact checking evaluation probes models' self-awareness, episodic memory retrieval, and relationship tracking, across both parametric and non-parametric approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T16:50:57Z)
• Accelerating Large Language Model Pretraining via LFR Pedagogy: Learn, Focus, and Review [50.78587571704713]
  Learn-Focus-Review (LFR) is a dynamic training approach that adapts to the model's learning progress.<n>LFR tracks the model's learning performance across data blocks (sequences of tokens) and prioritizes revisiting challenging regions of the dataset.<n>Compared to baseline models trained on the full datasets, LFR consistently achieved lower perplexity and higher accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T00:59:18Z)
• Self-Taught Evaluators [77.92610887220594]
  We present an approach that aims to im-proves without human annotations, using synthetic training data only. Our Self-Taught Evaluator can improve a strong LLM from 75.4 to 88.3 on RewardBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T17:57:02Z)
• The Languini Kitchen: Enabling Language Modelling Research at Different Scales of Compute [66.84421705029624]
  We introduce an experimental protocol that enables model comparisons based on equivalent compute, measured in accelerator hours. We pre-process an existing large, diverse, and high-quality dataset of books that surpasses existing academic benchmarks in quality, diversity, and document length. This work also provides two baseline models: a feed-forward model derived from the GPT-2 architecture and a recurrent model in the form of a novel LSTM with ten-fold throughput.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T10:31:17Z)
• Language models are weak learners [71.33837923104808]
  We show that prompt-based large language models can operate effectively as weak learners. We incorporate these models into a boosting approach, which can leverage the knowledge within the model to outperform traditional tree-based boosting. Results illustrate the potential for prompt-based LLMs to function not just as few-shot learners themselves, but as components of larger machine learning pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T02:39:19Z)
• On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References [101.79795027550959]
  Large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators over the original reference summaries in commonly used summarization datasets. We study an LLM-as-reference learning setting for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:56:04Z)
• Empirical evaluation of shallow and deep learning classifiers for Arabic sentiment analysis [1.1172382217477126]
  This work presents a detailed comparison of the performance of deep learning models for sentiment analysis of Arabic reviews. The datasets used in this study are multi-dialect Arabic hotel and book review datasets, which are some of the largest publicly available datasets for Arabic reviews. Results showed deep learning outperforming shallow learning for binary and multi-label classification, in contrast with the results of similar work reported in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-01T14:45:43Z)
• Sentiment Analysis of Yelp Reviews: A Comparison of Techniques and Models [15.37212212881138]
  We use over 350,000 Yelp reviews on 5,000 restaurants to perform an ablation study on text preprocessing techniques. For machine learning models, we find that using binary bag-of-word representation, adding bi-grams, imposing minimum frequency constraints and normalizing texts have positive effects on model performance. For deep learning models, we find that using pre-trained word embeddings and capping maximum length often boost model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T18:50:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.