Post-hoc Provider Fairness Adaptation via Hierarchical Exposure Alignment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01524v1
• Date: Sat, 02 May 2026 16:32:52 GMT
• Title: Post-hoc Provider Fairness Adaptation via Hierarchical Exposure Alignment
• Abstract summary: Post-hoc Fairness Adaptation (PFA) is a lightweight framework that equips a frozen recommender with a fairness adapter.<n>It learns personalized additive score adjustments from user-item embeddings to steer provider exposure toward fairness.<n>PFA achieves substantial fairness gains with negligible accuracy loss, consistently outperforming strong baselines.
• Score: 54.58748721533078
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Provider exposure fairness is crucial for sustaining a healthy content ecosystem and preventing monopolization in recommender systems. Yet, most existing methods either incorporate fairness constraints during model training, requiring expensive retraining when fairness objectives change, or rely on post-hoc reranking with fixed criteria, which lacks adaptability to diverse fairness requirements. To overcome these limitations, we propose Post-hoc Fairness Adaptation (PFA), a lightweight framework that equips a frozen recommender with a fairness adapter, enabling flexible fairness control without retraining the backbone model. Specifically, the fairness adapter learns personalized additive score adjustments from user-item embeddings, which are injected into the original ranking scores to steer provider exposure toward fairness. To train the adapter, we minimize the KL divergence between the actual and the target fair exposure distributions. However, this global objective implicitly treats all providers equally, ignoring structural disparities such as imbalanced provider group sizes and heterogeneous exposure within groups. Consequently, fairness may appear satisfied at an aggregate level while severe inter-group and intra-group exposure imbalances persist, undermining practical fairness. To address this, we design Hierarchical Exposure Fairness Alignment (HEFA), which explicitly balances inter- and intra-group provider exposure disparities, enabling flexible adaptation to diverse fairness requirements. To mitigate potential accuracy degradation, PFA jointly optimizes HEFA with a differentiable NDCG loss, enabling end-to-end fairness optimization while preserving ranking quality. Extensive experiments on three public datasets demonstrate that PFA achieves substantial fairness gains with negligible accuracy loss, consistently outperforming strong baselines.

Related papers

• Fairness Aware Reward Optimization [78.85867531002346]
  We introduce Fairness Aware Reward Optimization (Faro), an in-processing framework that trains reward models under demographic parity, equalized odds, or counterfactual fairness constraints.<n>We provide the first theoretical analysis of reward-level fairness in LLM alignment.<n>Faro significantly reduces bias and harmful generations while maintaining or improving model quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T03:35:49Z)
• Post-Training Fairness Control: A Single-Train Framework for Dynamic Fairness in Recommendation [13.743015531030473]
  Cofair is a single-train framework that enables post-training fairness control in recommendation.<n>Our framework provides dynamic fairness at different levels, delivering comparable or better fairness-accuracy curves than state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T18:48:43Z)
• FairPOT: Balancing AUC Performance and Fairness with Proportional Optimal Transport [9.47500733579604]
  In high-stakes domains such as healthcare, fairness is often evaluated over risk scores rather than binary outcomes.<n>We propose Fair Proportional Optimal Transport (FairPOT), a novel, model-agnostic post-processing framework.<n>We show that FairPOT consistently outperforms existing post-processing techniques in both global and partial AUC scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T22:13:08Z)
• FedFACT: A Provable Framework for Controllable Group-Fairness Calibration in Federated Learning [23.38141950440522]
  We propose a controllable federated group-fairness calibration framework, named FedFACT.<n>FedFACT identifies the Bayes-optimal classifiers under both global and local fairness constraints.<n>We show that FedFACT consistently outperforms baselines in balancing accuracy and global-local fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T09:39:57Z)
• pFedFair: Towards Optimal Group Fairness-Accuracy Trade-off in Heterogeneous Federated Learning [17.879602968559198]
  Federated learning algorithms aim to maximize clients' accuracy by training a model on their collective data.<n>Group fairness constraints can be incorporated into the objective function of the FL optimization problem.<n>We show that such an approach would lead to suboptimal classification accuracy in an FL setting with heterogeneous client distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T06:15:31Z)
• FairDgcl: Fairness-aware Recommendation with Dynamic Graph Contrastive Learning [48.38344934125999]
  We study how to implement high-quality data augmentation to improve recommendation fairness. Specifically, we propose FairDgcl, a dynamic graph adversarial contrastive learning framework. We show that FairDgcl can simultaneously generate enhanced representations that possess both fairness and accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T04:43:03Z)
• Fair-CDA: Continuous and Directional Augmentation for Group Fairness [48.84385689186208]
  We propose a fine-grained data augmentation strategy for imposing fairness constraints. We show that group fairness can be achieved by regularizing the models on transition paths of sensitive features between groups. Our proposed method does not assume any data generative model and ensures good generalization for both accuracy and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-01T11:23:00Z)
• DualFair: Fair Representation Learning at Both Group and Individual Levels via Contrastive Self-supervision [73.80009454050858]
  This work presents a self-supervised model, called DualFair, that can debias sensitive attributes like gender and race from learned representations. Our model jointly optimize for two fairness criteria - group fairness and counterfactual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T07:13:54Z)
• Chasing Fairness Under Distribution Shift: A Model Weight Perturbation Approach [72.19525160912943]
  We first theoretically demonstrate the inherent connection between distribution shift, data perturbation, and model weight perturbation. We then analyze the sufficient conditions to guarantee fairness for the target dataset. Motivated by these sufficient conditions, we propose robust fairness regularization (RFR)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T17:19:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.