Good in Bad (GiB): Sifting Through End-user Demonstrations for Learning a Better Policy
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01529v2
- Date: Sat, 09 May 2026 08:50:08 GMT
- Title: Good in Bad (GiB): Sifting Through End-user Demonstrations for Learning a Better Policy
- Abstract summary: We introduce GiB (Good-in-Bad), an algorithm that automatically identifies and discards erroneous subtasks within demonstrations.<n>The filtered data can then be used by any policy learning algorithm to train more robust policies.<n>We validate GiB on the Franka robot in both simulated and real-world multi-step tasks.
- Score: 1.376408511310322
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Imitation learning offers a promising framework for enabling robots to acquire diverse skills from human users. However, most imitation learning algorithms assume access to high-quality demonstrations an unrealistic expectation when collecting data from non-expert users, whose demonstrations often contain inadvertent errors. Naively learning from such demonstrations can result in unsafe policy behavior, while discarding entire demonstrations due to occasional mistakes wastes valuable data, especially in low-data settings. In this work, we introduce GiB (Good-in-Bad), an algorithm that automatically identifies and discards erroneous subtasks within demonstrations while preserving high-quality subtasks. The filtered data can then be used by any policy learning algorithm to train more robust policies. GiB first trains a self-supervised model to learn latent features and assigns binary weights to label each demonstration as good or bad. It then models the latent feature distribution of high-quality segments and uses the Mahalanobis distance to detect and evaluate poor-quality subtasks. We validate GiB on the Franka robot in both simulated and real-world multi-step tasks, demonstrating improved policy performance when learning from mixed-quality human demonstrations.
Related papers
- Curating Demonstrations using Online Experience [52.59275477573012]
We show that Demo-SCORE can effectively identify suboptimal demonstrations without manual curation.<n>Demo-SCORE achieves over 15-35% higher absolute success rate in the resulting policy compared to the base policy trained with all original demonstrations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-05T17:58:16Z) - AdaDemo: Data-Efficient Demonstration Expansion for Generalist Robotic Agent [75.91274222142079]
In this study, we aim to scale up demonstrations in a data-efficient way to facilitate the learning of generalist robotic agents.
AdaDemo is a framework designed to improve multi-task policy learning by actively and continually expanding the demonstration dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-11T01:59:29Z) - Any-point Trajectory Modeling for Policy Learning [64.23861308947852]
We introduce Any-point Trajectory Modeling (ATM) to predict future trajectories of arbitrary points within a video frame.
ATM outperforms strong video pre-training baselines by 80% on average.
We show effective transfer learning of manipulation skills from human videos and videos from a different robot morphology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-28T23:34:43Z) - Learning to Discern: Imitating Heterogeneous Human Demonstrations with
Preference and Representation Learning [12.4468604987226]
This paper introduces Learning to Discern (L2D), an offline imitation learning framework for learning from demonstrations with diverse quality and style.
We show that L2D can effectively assess and learn from varying demonstrations, thereby leading to improved policy performance across a range of tasks in both simulations and on a physical robot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-22T06:08:55Z) - Value function estimation using conditional diffusion models for control [62.27184818047923]
We propose a simple algorithm called Diffused Value Function (DVF)
It learns a joint multi-step model of the environment-robot interaction dynamics using a diffusion model.
We show how DVF can be used to efficiently capture the state visitation measure for multiple controllers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T18:40:55Z) - Robustness of Demonstration-based Learning Under Limited Data Scenario [54.912936555876826]
Demonstration-based learning has shown great potential in stimulating pretrained language models' ability under limited data scenario.
Why such demonstrations are beneficial for the learning process remains unclear since there is no explicit alignment between the demonstrations and the predictions.
In this paper, we design pathological demonstrations by gradually removing intuitively useful information from the standard ones to take a deep dive of the robustness of demonstration-based sequence labeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-19T16:15:04Z) - Eliciting Compatible Demonstrations for Multi-Human Imitation Learning [16.11830547863391]
Imitation learning from human-provided demonstrations is a strong approach for learning policies for robot manipulation.
Natural human behavior has a great deal of heterogeneity, with several optimal ways to demonstrate a task.
This mismatch presents a problem for interactive imitation learning, where sequences of users improve on a policy by iteratively collecting new, possibly conflicting demonstrations.
We show that we can both identify incompatible demonstrations via post-hoc filtering, and apply our compatibility measure to actively elicit compatible demonstrations from new users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-14T19:37:55Z) - Learning from Imperfect Demonstrations from Agents with Varying Dynamics [29.94164262533282]
We develop a metric composed of a feasibility score and an optimality score to measure how useful a demonstration is for imitation learning.
Our experiments on four environments in simulation and on a real robot show improved learned policies with higher expected return.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-10T07:39:38Z) - Robust Maximum Entropy Behavior Cloning [15.713997170792842]
Imitation learning (IL) algorithms use expert demonstrations to learn a specific task.
Most of the existing approaches assume that all expert demonstrations are reliable and trustworthy, but what if there exist some adversarial demonstrations among the given data-set?
We propose a novel general frame-work to directly generate a policy from demonstrations that autonomously detect the adversarial demonstrations and exclude them from the data set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-04T22:08:46Z) - Visual Imitation Made Easy [102.36509665008732]
We present an alternate interface for imitation that simplifies the data collection process while allowing for easy transfer to robots.
We use commercially available reacher-grabber assistive tools both as a data collection device and as the robot's end-effector.
We experimentally evaluate on two challenging tasks: non-prehensile pushing and prehensile stacking, with 1000 diverse demonstrations for each task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-11T17:58:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.