AI-Augmented Science and the New Institutional Scarcities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02566v1
• Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 13:16:08 GMT
• Title: AI-Augmented Science and the New Institutional Scarcities
• Abstract summary: Competent-looking judgment, including selecting, ranking, attributing, and certifying, is now produced at scale at marginal cost approaching zero.<n>This inverts the dominant economics-of-AI reading that treats judgment as the scarce complement to cheap prediction.
• Score: 0.4626793375563363
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Competent-looking judgment, including selecting, ranking, attributing, and certifying, is now produced at scale at marginal cost approaching zero, inverting the dominant economics-of-AI reading that treats judgment as the scarce complement to cheap prediction. Scientific institutions, distinctively, manufacture legitimate judgment, so they do not merely adapt to AI; they compete with it for the same functional role. Four complements then become scarce and load-bearing for AI-augmented science: verified signal, legitimacy, authentic provenance, and integration capacity (the community's tolerance for delegated cognition). Of these four, integration capacity is the least developed for scientific institutions and the most binding: no improvement in AI tooling can buy it. The frontier for AI-augmented science is not acceleration; it is the redesign of the certifying infrastructure around these new scarcities.

Related papers

• Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution [80.98492754957466]
  Core trustworthy AI objectives, such as fairness, robustness, privacy, and explainability, are hard to achieve simultaneously.<n>This paper argues that causality is necessary to understand and balance trade-offs in performance and multiple objectives of trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T14:26:28Z)
• Institutions for the Post-Scarcity of Judgment [0.4626793375563363]
  Each major technological revolution inverts a particular scarcity and rebuilds institutions around the shift.<n>The near-consensus diagnosis of the AI revolution holds that AI collapses the cost of prediction while judgment remains scarce.<n>This Opinion argues the inversion has now flipped: competent-looking judgment is produced at scale and at marginal cost approaching zero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T19:18:16Z)
• Punctuated Equilibria in Artificial Intelligence: The Institutional Scaling Law and the Speciation of Sovereign AI [0.0]
  We show that AI development proceeds not through smooth advancement but through extended periods of stasis interrupted by rapid phase transitions.<n>We develop a mathematical framework that evaluates AI systems along four dimensions: capability, institutional trust, affordability, and sovereign compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-15T23:36:01Z)
• AI Needs Physics More Than Physics Needs AI [0.0]
  The 2024 Nobel Prizes in Chemistry and Physics recognized AI's potential, but broader assessments indicate the impact to date is often more promotional than technical.<n>We argue that while current AI may influence physics, physics has significantly more to offer this generation of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T09:31:05Z)
• A Theory of Information, Variation, and Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  A growing body of empirical work suggests that the widespread adoption of generative AI produces a significant homogenizing effect on information, creativity, and cultural production.<n>This paper argues that the very homogenization that flattens knowledge within specialized domains simultaneously renders that knowledge into consistent modules that can be recombined across them.<n>The paper concludes by outlining the cognitive and institutional scaffolds required to resolve this tension, arguing they are the decisive variable that determine whether generative AI becomes an instrument of innovation or homogenization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T16:21:13Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences.<n>First, it is not sustainable, as, despite efficiency improvements, its compute demands increase faster than model performance.<n>Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Acceleration AI Ethics, the Debate between Innovation and Safety, and Stability AI's Diffusion versus OpenAI's Dall-E [0.0]
  This presentation responds by reconfiguring ethics as an innovation accelerator. The work of ethics is embedded in AI development and application, instead of functioning from outside.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-04T14:54:13Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making [53.62514158534574]
  We study whether features that reveal case-specific model information can calibrate trust and improve the joint performance of the human and AI. We show that confidence score can help calibrate people's trust in an AI model, but trust calibration alone is not sufficient to improve AI-assisted decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-07T15:33:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.