PHBench: A Benchmark for Predicting Startup Series A Funding from Product Hunt Launch Signals

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02974v1
• Date: Sun, 03 May 2026 17:03:33 GMT
• Title: PHBench: A Benchmark for Predicting Startup Series A Funding from Product Hunt Launch Signals
• Abstract summary: Structured launch signals on Product Hunt contain statistically significant predictive information for Series A funding outcomes.<n>We construct PHBench from 67,292 featured Product Hunt posts spanning 2019-2025, linked to Crunchbase funding records via deterministic domain matching.<n>We identify 528 verified Series A raises within 18 months of launch (positive rate: 0.78%).
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Structured launch signals on Product Hunt contain statistically significant predictive information for Series A funding outcomes. We construct PHBench from 67,292 featured Product Hunt posts spanning 2019-2025, linked to Crunchbase funding records via deterministic domain matching, identifying 528 verified Series A raises within 18 months of launch (positive rate: 0.78%). Our best-performing model, a three-component ensemble (ENS_avg, ENS_ISO, XGB) selected by validation F0.5, achieves F0.5 = 0.097 and AP = 0.037 (95% CI: 0.024-0.072; 4.7x lift over random) on the private held-out test set (103 positives). A paired bootstrap confirms a statistically credible advantage over the logistic regression baseline (AP delta: +0.013, 95% CI: [0.004, 0.039], p < 0.001; F0.5 delta: +0.056, 95% CI: [0.006, 0.122], p = 0.016). Validation-set metrics (F0.5 = 0.284, AP = 0.126) reflect best-of-144 selection bias on 53 positives and are reported for benchmark reproducibility only. We further evaluate three zero-shot Gemini models (Gemini 2.5 Flash, Gemini 3 Flash, and Gemini 3.1 Pro) in an anonymized numerical setting. The best LLM achieves AP = 0.034 (Gemini 3 Flash), below the LR baseline AP of 0.044. Notably, the most capable Gemini variant (Gemini 3.1 Pro, AP = 0.023) performs worst -- an unexpected pattern that warrants further investigation across providers and prompting strategies. Both ML and LLM models show the same temporal performance decay tracking the 2020-2021 funding boom and subsequent contraction, confirming the dataset captures genuine market structure rather than noise. PHBench provides a reproducible framework comprising public training, validation, and blind test splits; 61 engineered features; a five-metric evaluation harness; and a public leaderboard at https://phbench.com. All code, baseline models, and anonymized dataset splits are publicly available.

Related papers

• TriCalRAG: A Three-Strategy, Retrieval-Augmented Benchmark for On-Premise LLM-Based Root Cause Analysis in AIOps [1.8136615181861766]
  Cloud-hosted large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for root cause analysis (RCA) in AIOps pipelines.<n>They introduce data privacy risk, network latency, and per-query cost that scale poorly with production log volumes.<n>We presentRAG, a benchmark evaluating open-weights served locally via vLLM against a classical LSTM-based log anomaly detector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-13T19:52:46Z)
• Sampling headroom is not selection gain: a compute-value audit of test-time scaling for video world models [34.20907662027954]
  Test-time scaling can improve generation only when additional compute produces better candidates and the system can reliably identify them.<n>We introduce the Compute-Value Audit (CVA), a sequential framework that asks whether extra sampling creates opportunity.<n>On 192 Physics-IQ scenes, expanding the pool from 4 to 16 candidates increases oracle quality by +9.23 IQ.<n>None of twelve adaptive-depth policies outperforms uniform compute; they recover only 42-69% of the measured entry fee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-06T06:11:15Z)
• Accurate Ensembles, Fragile Narratives: Multi-Scale Stacking and a Fidelity Audit of LLM-Generated Explanations for Credit Risk [0.0]
  Credit scoring increasingly relies on models whose decision logic cannot be read off their parameters.<n>A common proposal closes that gap with a language model: compute feature attributions, hand them to an LLM, and let it write the rationale.<n>We build such a system end to end and test whether the second half of the promise holds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T13:22:14Z)
• Sample-Adaptive Latent Rewards for Uncertainty-Guided Diffusion Post-Training [51.18425726646089]
  We propose textscSURE, a unified latent-space framework for image and video diffusion models.<n>It learns reward distributions and directly uses their reliability to guide dense post-training.<n>textscSURE-REFL achieves the highest VBench quality, semantic, and total scores among the evaluated methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T14:55:42Z)
• Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion [46.262619407930266]
  We train a multi-label classifier on a curated gold dataset of 1,207 CVEs from expert MITRE Center for Threat-Informed Defense mappings.<n>The resulting model approximately doubles recall@5 compared with a zero-shot embedding-similarity baseline.<n>We then investigate whether LLM-assisted labeling can extend the gold dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T10:59:04Z)
• Knowledge Index of Noah's Ark [63.143852586221534]
  We introduce KINA, an 899-item benchmark across 261 fine-grained disciplines.<n>We prove a bonus-on-bar tournament weakly FOSD-dominates flat payment in released-review quality.<n>The top model, Gemini-3.1-Pro-Preview, reaches 53.17%, followed by Claude-Opus-4.6 at 49.92% and GPT-5.4 at 48.55%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T17:06:49Z)
• Distributional Energy-Based Models for Uncertainty-Aware Structured LLM Reasoning [40.342912574072024]
  Large Language Models produce structured outputs such as travel plans or code solutions.<n>Individual reasoning steps may appear correct while the output as a whole violates budgets, fails test cases, or contradicts earlier deductions.<n>We propose a learned quality scorer with deterministic analytical constraint penalties for verifying structured LLM outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T17:08:27Z)
• VERDI: Single-Call Confidence Estimation for Verification-Based LLM Judges via Decomposed Inference [0.0]
  VERDI (VERification-Decomposed Inference Inference) is a method that extracts confidence from a structured judge.<n> VERDI decomposes each evaluation into sub-checks and derives three structural signals.<n>On three public benchmarks, VERDI achieves AUROC 0.72-0.91 on GPT-4.1-mini and 0.66-0.80 on GPT-5.4-mini.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T23:39:19Z)
• When Correct Isn't Usable: Improving Structured Output Reliability in Small Language Models [2.064923532131528]
  Deployed language models must produce outputs that are both correct and format-compliant.<n>We study this structured-output reliability gap using two mathematical benchmarks -- GSM8K and MATH.<n>We develop AloLab, an iterative system-prompt requiring only black-box API access to the target model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T09:07:44Z)
• Metric Unreliability in Multimodal Machine Unlearning: A Systematic Analysis and Principled Unified Score [14.579552536669217]
  Unlearning in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) is required for compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation Code.<n>We present the first study of reliability in multimodal unlearning.<n>We introduce the Unified Quality Score (UQS), a metric with weights derived from each metric's Spearman correlation with the metric distance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T04:13:00Z)
• The Surprising Universality of LLM Outputs: A Real-Time Verification Primitive [0.0]
  CPU-only scoring primitive runs at 2.6 microseconds per token.<n> token rank-frequency distributions converge to the same two- parameter Mandelbrot ranking distribution.<n>We derive a single-pass scoring primitive that composes with model log probabilities when available and degrades to a rank-only mode usable on closed APIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T13:35:31Z)
• An Integrated Framework for Explainable, Fair, and Observable Hospital Readmission Prediction: Development and Validation on MIMIC-IV [0.0]
  We constructed a cohort of 415231 adult admissions from the MIMIC-IV database.<n>This framework delivers competitive performance, clinically actionable explanations, and strong demographic equity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T13:21:44Z)
• Evaluating Tool-Using Language Agents: Judge Reliability, Propagation Cascades, and Runtime Mitigation in AgentProp-Bench [0.0]
  We introduce AgentProp-Bench, a 2,000-task benchmark with 2,300 traces across four domains.<n>We quantify judge reliability, characterize error propagation, and evaluate a runtime mitigation.<n>All code, data, traces, and human labels are released at https://github.com/bhaskargurram-ai/agenthallu-bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T21:15:35Z)
• FIPO: Eliciting Deep Reasoning with Future-KL Influenced Policy Optimization [84.58281577727566]
  We present Future-KL Influenced Policy Optimization (FIPO), a reinforcement learning algorithm designed to overcome reasoning bottlenecks in large language models.<n>FIPO addresses this by incorporating discounted future-KL divergence into the policy update, creating a dense advantage formulation that re-weights tokens based on their influence on subsequent trajectory behavior.<n> evaluated on Qwen2.5-32B, FIPO extends the average chain-of-thought length from roughly 4,000 to over 10,000 tokens and increases AIME 2024 Pass@1 accuracy from 50.0% to a peak of 58.0%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T10:24:50Z)
• Prompting Test-Time Scaling Is A Strong LLM Reasoning Data Augmentation [43.29267000439331]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities when provided with chain-of-thought exemplars.<n>In this work, we introduce Prompting Test-Time Scaling (P-TTS), a simple yet effective inference-time data augmentation strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T17:57:04Z)
• CLUE: Non-parametric Verification from Experience via Hidden-State Clustering [64.50919789875233]
  We show that correctness of a solution is encoded as a geometrically separable signature within the trajectory of hidden activations.<n>ClUE consistently outperforms LLM-as-a-judge baselines and matches or exceeds modern confidence-based methods in reranking candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T02:14:33Z)
• Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment [75.83359213697854]
  Recent advancements suggest that directly working with preference probabilities can yield a more accurate reflection of human preferences. We propose a self-play-based method for language model alignment, which treats the problem as a constant-sum two-player game. Our approach, dubbed Self-Play Preference Optimization (SPPO), utilizes iterative policy updates to provably approximate the Nash equilibrium.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T17:59:20Z)
• A Meta-Learning Approach to Predicting Performance and Data Requirements [163.4412093478316]
  We propose an approach to estimate the number of samples required for a model to reach a target performance. We find that the power law, the de facto principle to estimate model performance, leads to large error when using a small dataset. We introduce a novel piecewise power law (PPL) that handles the two data differently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T21:48:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.