Erase Persona, Forget Lore: Benchmarking Multimodal Copyright Unlearning in Large Vision Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03547v1
• Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 09:18:22 GMT
• Title: Erase Persona, Forget Lore: Benchmarking Multimodal Copyright Unlearning in Large Vision Language Models
• Abstract summary: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) trained on web-scale data risk memorizing and regenerating copyrighted visual content.<n>We introduce the CoVUBench benchmark, the first framework specifically designed for evaluating copyright content unlearning in LVLMs.
• Score: 19.949184312340556
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), trained on web-scale data, risk memorizing and regenerating copyrighted visual content such as characters and logos, creating significant challenges. Machine unlearning offers a path to mitigate these risks by removing specific content post-training, but evaluating its effectiveness, especially in the complex multimodal setting of LVLMs, remains an open problem. Current evaluation methods often lack robustness or fail to capture the nuances of cross-modal concept erasure. To address this critical gap, we introduce the CoVUBench benchmark, the first framework specifically designed for evaluating copyright content unlearning in LVLMs. CoVUBench utilizes procedurally generated, legally safe synthetic data coupled with systematic visual variations spanning compositional changes and diverse domain manifestations to ensure realistic and robust evaluation of unlearning generalization. Our comprehensive multimodal evaluation protocol assesses both forgetting efficacy from the copyright holder perspective and the preservation of general model utility from the deployer viewpoint. By rigorously measuring this crucial trade-off, CoVUBench provides a standardized tool to advance the development of responsible and effective unlearning methods for LVLMs.

Related papers

• LIMSSR: LLM-Driven Sequence-to-Score Reasoning under Training-Time Incomplete Multimodal Observations [53.20772659095155]
  This paper tackles the more challenging setting of IML under training-time incomplete observations.<n>We propose LIMSSR (LLM-Driven Incomplete Multimodal Sequence-to-Score Reasoning), a framework that reformulates this challenge as a conditional sequence reasoning task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T06:11:42Z)
• Beyond Standard Benchmarks: A Systematic Audit of Vision-Language Model's Robustness to Natural Semantic Variation Across Diverse Tasks [11.064940886724257]
  This paper presents a systematic evaluation framework for vision-language models (VLMs) under natural adversarial scenarios.<n>We measure the natural adversarial performance of selected VLMs for zero-shot image classification, semantic segmentation, and visual question answering.<n>Our analysis reveals that robust CLIP models can amplify natural adversarial vulnerabilities, and CLIP models significantly reduce performance for natural language-induced adversarial examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T06:48:32Z)
• From Sparse Decisions to Dense Reasoning: A Multi-attribute Trajectory Paradigm for Multimodal Moderation [59.27094165576015]
  We propose a novel learning paradigm (UniMod) that transitions from sparse decision-making to dense reasoning traces.<n>By constructing structured trajectories encompassing evidence grounding, modality assessment, risk mapping, policy decision, and response generation, we reformulate monolithic decision tasks into a multi-dimensional boundary learning process.<n>We introduce specialized optimization strategies to decouple task-specific parameters and rebalance training dynamics, effectively resolving interference between diverse objectives in multi-task learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T09:29:40Z)
• AUVIC: Adversarial Unlearning of Visual Concepts for Multi-modal Large Language Models [63.05306474002547]
  Regulatory frameworks mandating the 'right to be forgotten' drive the need for machine unlearning.<n>We introduce AUVIC, a novel visual concept unlearning framework for MLLMs.<n>We show that AUVIC achieves state-of-the-art target forgetting rates while incurs minimal performance degradation on non-target concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T13:35:32Z)
• Continual Learning for VLMs: A Survey and Taxonomy Beyond Forgetting [70.83781268763215]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved impressive performance across diverse multimodal tasks by leveraging large-scale pre-training.<n>VLMs face unique challenges such as cross-modal feature drift, parameter interference due to shared architectures, and zero-shot capability erosion.<n>This survey aims to serve as a comprehensive and diagnostic reference for researchers developing lifelong vision-language systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T09:03:10Z)
• Text2VLM: Adapting Text-Only Datasets to Evaluate Alignment Training in Visual Language Models [0.0]
  Existing evaluation datasets lean towards text-only prompts, leaving visual vulnerabilities under evaluated.<n>We propose Text2VLM, a novel multi-stage pipeline that adapts text-only datasets into multimodal formats.<n>Text2VLM provides a scalable tool for comprehensive safety assessment, contributing to the development of more robust safety mechanisms for Visual Language Models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T10:57:44Z)
• Image Can Bring Your Memory Back: A Novel Multi-Modal Guided Attack against Image Generation Model Unlearning [28.15997901023315]
  Recall is a novel adversarial framework designed to compromise the robustness of unlearned IGMs.<n>It consistently outperforms existing baselines in terms of adversarial effectiveness, computational efficiency, and semantic fidelity with the original prompt.<n>These findings reveal critical vulnerabilities in current unlearning mechanisms and underscore the need for more robust solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T02:59:01Z)
• PEBench: A Fictitious Dataset to Benchmark Machine Unlearning for Multimodal Large Language Models [27.338242898495448]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success in vision-language tasks.<n>Their reliance on vast, internet-sourced data raises significant privacy and security concerns.<n>Machine unlearning (MU) has emerged as a critical technique to address these issues.<n>PEBench is a novel benchmark designed to facilitate a thorough assessment of MU in MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T15:26:20Z)
• Benchmarking Vision Language Model Unlearning via Fictitious Facial Identity Dataset [92.99416966226724]
  We introduce Facial Identity Unlearning Benchmark (FIUBench), a novel VLM unlearning benchmark designed to robustly evaluate the effectiveness of unlearning algorithms.<n>We apply a two-stage evaluation pipeline that is designed to precisely control the sources of information and their exposure levels.<n>Through the evaluation of four baseline VLM unlearning algorithms within FIUBench, we find that all methods remain limited in their unlearning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T23:26:10Z)
• Preserving Multi-Modal Capabilities of Pre-trained VLMs for Improving Vision-Linguistic Compositionality [69.76121008898677]
  Fine-grained Selective Calibrated CLIP integrates local hard negative loss and selective calibrated regularization. Our evaluations show that FSC-CLIP not only achieves compositionality on par with state-of-the-art models but also retains strong multi-modal capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T17:16:20Z)
• Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models via Image-Grounded Guidance [51.30560006045442]
  Image-gRounded guIdaNcE (MARINE) is a framework that is both training-free and API-free.<n>MARINE effectively and efficiently reduces object hallucinations during inference by introducing image-grounded guidance to LVLMs.<n>Our framework's flexibility further allows for the integration of multiple vision models, enabling more reliable and robust object-level guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T18:59:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.