Toward an Understanding of Developer Behaviour while Using Bug Localization Tools

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04828v1
• Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 12:21:30 GMT
• Title: Toward an Understanding of Developer Behaviour while Using Bug Localization Tools
• Abstract summary: The study demonstrates that bug localization is complex and suggests that the adoption of effective tools depends on more than their accuracy.<n>The preliminary findings provide insight into how developers interact with tools, the role social and contextual information plays, and problem solving.
• Score: 2.4163616087447877
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Bug fixing is a complex and time-consuming task in software development. Bug localization research tends to focus on the accuracy of automated tools that suggest source code files for developers to look at. However, little is known about how developers use these tools in practice. This paper reports on an ongoing qualitative user study. Eleven participants worked through four realistic bug localization tasks in a controlled environment and were given varying levels of support information offered by a specialized tool. Participants were asked to think aloud in a semi-structured interview session. The preliminary findings provide insight into three aspects of practice: how developers interact with tools, the role social and contextual information plays, and problem solving. The study demonstrates that bug localization is complex and suggests that the adoption of effective tools depends on more than their accuracy.

Related papers

• A Grounded Theory of Debugging in Professional Software Engineering Practice [5.88596290266904]
  We conducted a study using a grounded theory approach.<n>We observed seven professional developers and five professional live-coding streamers working on 17 debug tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T23:19:45Z)
• Bug Detective and Quality Coach: Developers' Mental Models of AI-Assisted IDE Tools [6.740088349470244]
  We conducted six co-design workshops with 58 developers to elicit their mental models about AI-assisted bug detection and readability features.<n>It emerged that developers conceive bug detection tools as textitbug detectives, which warn users only in case of critical issues.<n>Trust, in both tasks, depends on the clarity of explanations, timing, and user control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T09:28:51Z)
• Do AI models help produce verified bug fixes? [62.985237003585674]
  Large Language Models are used to produce corrections to software bugs.<n>This paper investigates how programmers use Large Language Models to complement their own skills.<n>The results are a first step towards a proper role for AI and LLMs in providing guaranteed-correct fixes to program bugs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T17:30:16Z)
• Interactive Agents to Overcome Ambiguity in Software Engineering [61.40183840499932]
  AI agents are increasingly being deployed to automate tasks, often based on ambiguous and underspecified user instructions.<n>Making unwarranted assumptions and failing to ask clarifying questions can lead to suboptimal outcomes.<n>We study the ability of LLM agents to handle ambiguous instructions in interactive code generation settings by evaluating proprietary and open-weight models on their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T17:12:26Z)
• Adaptive Tool Use in Large Language Models with Meta-Cognition Trigger [49.81945268343162]
  We propose MeCo, an adaptive decision-making strategy for external tool use.<n>MeCo quantifies metacognitive scores by capturing high-level cognitive signals in the representation space.<n>MeCo is fine-tuning-free and incurs minimal cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:45:01Z)
• ToolCoder: A Systematic Code-Empowered Tool Learning Framework for Large Language Models [81.12673534903979]
  Tool learning has emerged as a crucial capability for large language models (LLMs) to solve complex real-world tasks through interaction with external tools.<n>We propose ToolCoder, a novel framework that reformulates tool learning as a code generation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T03:42:28Z)
• Code Compass: A Study on the Challenges of Navigating Unfamiliar Codebases [2.808331566391181]
  We propose a novel tool, Code, to address these issues. Our study highlights a significant gap in current tools and methodologies. Our formative study demonstrates how effectively the tool reduces the time developers spend navigating documentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T06:58:31Z)
• A Comparative Study of Transformer-based Neural Text Representation Techniques on Bug Triaging [8.831760500324318]
  We offer one of the first investigations that fine-tunes transformer-based language models for the task of bug triaging. DeBERTa is the most effective technique across the triaging tasks of developer and component assignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T18:09:32Z)
• Using Developer Discussions to Guide Fixing Bugs in Software [51.00904399653609]
  We propose using bug report discussions, which are available before the task is performed and are also naturally occurring, avoiding the need for additional information from developers. We demonstrate that various forms of natural language context derived from such discussions can aid bug-fixing, even leading to improved performance over using commit messages corresponding to the oracle bug-fixing commits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T16:37:33Z)
• BigIssue: A Realistic Bug Localization Benchmark [89.8240118116093]
  BigIssue is a benchmark for realistic bug localization. We provide a general benchmark with a diversity of real and synthetic Java bugs. We hope to advance the state of the art in bug localization, in turn improving APR performance and increasing its applicability to the modern development cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T20:17:53Z)
• Early Detection of Security-Relevant Bug Reports using Machine Learning: How Far Are We? [6.438136820117887]
  In a typical maintenance scenario, security-relevant bug reports are prioritised by the development team when preparing corrective patches. Open security-relevant bug reports can become a critical leak of sensitive information that attackers can leverage to perform zero-day attacks. In recent years, approaches for the detection of security-relevant bug reports based on machine learning have been reported with promising performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-19T11:30:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.