Cross-Model Consistency of Feature Importance in Electrospinning: Separating Robust from Model-Dependent Features

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04905v2
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 09:55:21 GMT
• Title: Cross-Model Consistency of Feature Importance in Electrospinning: Separating Robust from Model-Dependent Features
• Abstract summary: Machine learning (ML) methods are increasingly employed to model electrospinning processes.<n>Most existing studies rely on a single ML model, implicitly assuming that the resulting feature importance is robust and reproducible.<n>This study systematically evaluated the consistency of feature importance across multiple ML model families.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Electrospinning is a highly sensitive fabrication process in which small variations in operating parameters can significantly influence fiber morphology and material performance. Machine learning (ML) methods are increasingly employed to model these process-structure relationships and to identify the relative importance of processing variables. However, most existing studies rely on a single ML model, implicitly assuming that the resulting feature importance is robust and reproducible. In this study, the consistency of feature importance across multiple ML model families was systematically evaluated using a curated dataset of 96 polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) electrospinning experiments. Twenty-one ML models representing linear, tree-based, kernel-based, neural network, and instance-based approaches were trained and compared. To provide a unified interpretability framework, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were used to calculate feature importance consistently across all models. A rank-based statistical analysis was then performed to quantify inter-model agreement and assess the robustness of parameter rankings. The results demonstrate that predictive performance and interpretive reliability are fundamentally distinct properties. Although several models achieved comparable predictive accuracy, substantial differences were observed in their feature importance rankings. Solution concentration emerged as the most robust and consistently influential parameter (variability = 0), whereas flow rate and applied voltage exhibited high ranking variability (variability > 0.9), indicating strong model dependence. These findings suggest that feature importance derived from a single ML model may be unreliable, particularly for small experimental datasets, and highlight the importance of cross-model validation for achieving trustworthy interpretation in ML-assisted electrospinning research.

Related papers

• Scalable Learning of Multivariate Distributions via Coresets [48.02318786960811]
  We develop a novel coreset construction for multivariate conditional transformation models (MCTMs) to enhance their scalability and training efficiency.<n>Our approach yields substantial data reduction via importance sampling.<n>Compared to conventional full-parametric models, where coresets have been incorporated before, our semi-parametric approach exhibits enhanced adaptability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T09:28:43Z)
• Aggregate Models, Not Explanations: Improving Feature Importance Estimation [29.82699646128964]
  We show that ensembling at the model level provides more accurate variable-importance estimates.<n>We validate these findings on classical benchmarks and a large-scale proteomic study from the UK Biobank.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T09:36:03Z)
• Equivariant Evidential Deep Learning for Interatomic Potentials [55.6997213490859]
  Uncertainty quantification is critical for assessing the reliability of machine learning interatomic potentials in molecular dynamics simulations.<n>Existing UQ approaches for MLIPs are often limited by high computational cost or suboptimal performance.<n>We propose textitEquivariant Evidential Deep Learning for Interatomic Potentials ($texte2$IP), a backbone-agnostic framework that models atomic forces and their uncertainty jointly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T02:00:25Z)
• Model Correlation Detection via Random Selection Probing [62.093777777813756]
  Existing similarity-based methods require access to model parameters or produce scores without thresholds.<n>We introduce Random Selection Probing (RSP), a hypothesis-testing framework that formulates model correlation detection as a statistical test.<n>RSP produces rigorous p-values that quantify evidence of correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T01:40:26Z)
• Why Knowledge Distillation Works in Generative Models: A Minimal Working Explanation [50.784080714897776]
  Knowledge distillation (KD) is a core component in the training and deployment of modern generative models.<n>We show that KD induces a trade-off between precision and recall in the student model.<n>Our analysis provides a simple and general explanation for the effectiveness of KD in generative modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T13:39:47Z)
• Quantifying Uncertainty and Variability in Machine Learning: Confidence Intervals for Quantiles in Performance Metric Distributions [0.17265013728931003]
  Machine learning models are widely used in applications where reliability and robustness are critical.<n>Model evaluation often relies on single-point estimates of performance metrics that fail to capture the inherent variability in model performance.<n>This contribution explores the use of quantiles and confidence intervals to analyze such distributions, providing a more complete understanding of model performance and its uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T13:21:34Z)
• Measuring Variable Importance in Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Confidence [33.12963161545068]
  Causal machine learning holds promise for estimating individual treatment effects from complex data.<n>We propose PermuCATE, an algorithm based on the Conditional Permutation (CPI) method.<n>We empirically demonstrate the benefits of PermuCATE in simulated and real-world health datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T11:44:07Z)
• Predictive Analytics of Varieties of Potatoes [2.336821989135698]
  We explore the application of machine learning algorithms specifically to enhance the selection process of Russet potato clones in breeding trials. This study addresses the challenge of efficiently identifying high-yield, disease-resistant, and climate-resilient potato varieties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T00:49:05Z)
• Building Robust Machine Learning Models for Small Chemical Science Data: The Case of Shear Viscosity [3.4761212729163313]
  We train several Machine Learning models to predict the shear viscosity of a Lennard-Jones (LJ) fluid. Specifically, the issues related to model selection, performance estimation and uncertainty quantification were investigated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T07:33:14Z)
• How robust are pre-trained models to distribution shift? [82.08946007821184]
  We show how spurious correlations affect the performance of popular self-supervised learning (SSL) and auto-encoder based models (AE) We develop a novel evaluation scheme with the linear head trained on out-of-distribution (OOD) data, to isolate the performance of the pre-trained models from a potential bias of the linear head used for evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T16:18:28Z)
• Bayesian Active Learning for Discrete Latent Variable Models [19.852463786440122]
  Active learning seeks to reduce the amount of data required to fit the parameters of a model. latent variable models play a vital role in neuroscience, psychology, and a variety of other engineering and scientific disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T19:07:12Z)
• Multiplicative noise and heavy tails in stochastic optimization [62.993432503309485]
  empirical optimization is central to modern machine learning, but its role in its success is still unclear. We show that it commonly arises in parameters of discrete multiplicative noise due to variance. A detailed analysis is conducted in which we describe on key factors, including recent step size, and data, all exhibit similar results on state-of-the-art neural network models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T09:58:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.