Quantifying Uncertainty and Variability in Machine Learning: Confidence Intervals for Quantiles in Performance Metric Distributions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16931v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 13:21:34 GMT
• Title: Quantifying Uncertainty and Variability in Machine Learning: Confidence Intervals for Quantiles in Performance Metric Distributions
• Authors: Christoph Lehmann, Yahor Paromau,
• Abstract summary: Machine learning models are widely used in applications where reliability and robustness are critical. Model evaluation often relies on single-point estimates of performance metrics that fail to capture the inherent variability in model performance. This contribution explores the use of quantiles and confidence intervals to analyze such distributions, providing a more complete understanding of model performance and its uncertainty.
• Score: 0.17265013728931003
• License:
• Abstract: Machine learning models are widely used in applications where reliability and robustness are critical. Model evaluation often relies on single-point estimates of performance metrics such as accuracy, F1 score, or mean squared error, that fail to capture the inherent variability in model performance. This variability arises from multiple sources, including train-test split, weights initialization, and hyperparameter tuning. Investigating the characteristics of performance metric distributions, rather than focusing on a single point only, is essential for informed decision-making during model selection and optimization, especially in high-stakes settings. How does the performance metric vary due to intrinsic uncertainty in the selected modeling approach? For example, train-test split is modified, initial weights for optimization are modified or hyperparameter tuning is done using an algorithm with probabilistic nature? This is shifting the focus from identifying a single best model to understanding a distribution of the performance metric that captures variability across different training conditions. By running multiple experiments with varied settings, empirical distributions of performance metrics can be generated. Analyzing these distributions can lead to more robust models that generalize well across diverse scenarios. This contribution explores the use of quantiles and confidence intervals to analyze such distributions, providing a more complete understanding of model performance and its uncertainty. Aimed at a statistically interested audience within the machine learning community, the suggested approaches are easy to implement and apply to various performance metrics for classification and regression problems. Given the often long training times in ML, particular attention is given to small sample sizes (in the order of 10-25).

Related papers

• Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistency [76.23956851098598]
  We explore the potential of deriving confidence from the distribution of multiple randomly sampled model generations, via three measures of consistency. Results show that consistency-based calibration methods outperform existing post-hoc approaches. We offer practical guidance on choosing suitable consistency metrics for calibration, tailored to the characteristics of various LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T16:15:20Z)
• Towards Understanding Variants of Invariant Risk Minimization through the Lens of Calibration [0.6906005491572401]
  We show that Information Bottleneck-based IRM achieves consistent calibration across different environments. Our empirical evidence indicates that models exhibiting consistent calibration across environments are also well-calibrated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T02:08:43Z)
• Variational Factorization Machines for Preference Elicitation in Large-Scale Recommender Systems [17.050774091903552]
  We propose a variational formulation of factorization machines (FMs) that can be easily optimized using standard mini-batch descent gradient. Our algorithm learns an approximate posterior distribution over the user and item parameters, which leads to confidence intervals over the predictions. We show, using several datasets, that it has comparable or better performance than existing methods in terms of prediction accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T00:06:28Z)
• An Additive Instance-Wise Approach to Multi-class Model Interpretation [53.87578024052922]
  Interpretable machine learning offers insights into what factors drive a certain prediction of a black-box system. Existing methods mainly focus on selecting explanatory input features, which follow either locally additive or instance-wise approaches. This work exploits the strengths of both methods and proposes a global framework for learning local explanations simultaneously for multiple target classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T06:50:27Z)
• Predicting Out-of-Domain Generalization with Neighborhood Invariance [59.05399533508682]
  We propose a measure of a classifier's output invariance in a local transformation neighborhood. Our measure is simple to calculate, does not depend on the test point's true label, and can be applied even in out-of-domain (OOD) settings. In experiments on benchmarks in image classification, sentiment analysis, and natural language inference, we demonstrate a strong and robust correlation between our measure and actual OOD generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T14:55:16Z)
• Uncertainty Modeling for Out-of-Distribution Generalization [56.957731893992495]
  We argue that the feature statistics can be properly manipulated to improve the generalization ability of deep learning models. Common methods often consider the feature statistics as deterministic values measured from the learned features. We improve the network generalization ability by modeling the uncertainty of domain shifts with synthesized feature statistics during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T16:09:12Z)
• Post-hoc Models for Performance Estimation of Machine Learning Inference [22.977047604404884]
  Estimating how well a machine learning model performs during inference is critical in a variety of scenarios. We systematically generalize performance estimation to a diverse set of metrics and scenarios. We find that proposed post-hoc models consistently outperform the standard confidence baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-06T02:20:37Z)
• Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributions [90.68414180153897]
  We connect domain adaptation and predictive uncertainty literature to predict model accuracy on challenging unseen distributions. We find that the difference of confidences (DoC) of a classifier's predictions successfully estimates the classifier's performance change over a variety of shifts. We specifically investigate the distinction between synthetic and natural distribution shifts and observe that despite its simplicity DoC consistently outperforms other quantifications of distributional difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T15:50:18Z)
• Meta-Learned Confidence for Few-shot Learning [60.6086305523402]
  A popular transductive inference technique for few-shot metric-based approaches, is to update the prototype of each class with the mean of the most confident query examples. We propose to meta-learn the confidence for each query sample, to assign optimal weights to unlabeled queries. We validate our few-shot learning model with meta-learned confidence on four benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T10:22:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.