Beyond Semantics: An Evidential Reasoning-Aware Multi-View Learning Framework for Trustworthy Mental Health Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05121v1
• Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 16:49:17 GMT
• Title: Beyond Semantics: An Evidential Reasoning-Aware Multi-View Learning Framework for Trustworthy Mental Health Prediction
• Abstract summary: Automated mental health prediction using textual data has shown promising results with deep learning and large language models.<n>Existing approaches largely rely on semantic representations and often produce overconfident predictions under ambiguous, noisy, or shifted data.<n>We propose a multi-view learning problem that integrates semantic information from encoder-only models with higher-level reasoning information from decoder-only models.
• Score: 22.40813291181261
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Automated mental health prediction using textual data has shown promising results with deep learning and large language models. However, deploying these models in high-stakes real-world settings remains challenging, as existing approaches largely rely on semantic representations and often produce overconfident predictions under ambiguous, noisy, or shifted data. Moreover, most methods lack reliable uncertainty estimation, undermining trust in risk-sensitive mental health applications. To address these limitations, we formulate the task as a multi-view learning problem that integrates semantic information from encoder-only models with higher-level reasoning information from decoder-only models, where reasoning-aware representations and uncertainty modeling are obtained in a trustworthy manner. To ensure reliable fusion, we adopt an evidential learning framework based on Subjective Logic to explicitly model uncertainty and introduce an evidential fusion strategy that balances complementary views while discounting unreliable evidence. Benchmarking on three real-world datasets, Dreaddit, SDCNL, and DepSeverity, reports accuracies of 0.835, 0.731, and 0.751, respectively, demonstrating its potential for reliable mental health prediction. Additional experiments on robustness to noise and case studies for interpretability confirm that our proposed framework not only improves predictive performance but also provides trustworthy uncertainty estimates and human-understandable reasoning signals, making it suitable for risk-sensitive applications in mental health assessment.

Related papers

• Aligning LLM Uncertainty with Human Disagreement in Subjectivity Analysis [57.78407973423517]
  We advocate uncertainty-aware subjectivity analysis, where models are expected to make predictions while expressing uncertainty that reflects human disagreement.<n>To operationalize this perspective, we propose a two-phase Disagreement Perception and Uncertainty Alignment framework.<n> Experiments on three subjectivity analysis tasks show that DPUA preserves task performance while better aligning model uncertainty with human disagreement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T11:52:58Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Depression Estimation via Disentangled Evidential Learning [50.22167852149165]
  We propose EviDep, an evidential learning framework that jointly quantifies depression severity.<n>EviDep enforces strict information integrity to guarantee robust evidence synthesis.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art predictive accuracy and superior uncertainty calibration, delivering a robust fail-safe mechanism for trustworthy clinical screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-17T13:27:11Z)
• From Passive Metric to Active Signal: The Evolving Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models [77.04403907729738]
  This survey charts the evolution of uncertainty from a passive diagnostic metric to an active control signal guiding real-time model behavior.<n>We demonstrate how uncertainty is leveraged as an active control signal across three frontiers.<n>This survey argues that mastering the new trend of uncertainty is essential for building the next generation of scalable, reliable, and trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T06:21:31Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical LLMs: Benchmarking and Enhancing Confidence Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Consultation [97.36081721024728]
  We propose the first benchmark for assessing confidence in multi-turn interaction during realistic medical consultations.<n>Our benchmark unifies three types of medical data for open-ended diagnostic generation.<n>We present MedConf, an evidence-grounded linguistic self-assessment framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T04:51:39Z)
• Decoding Federated Learning: The FedNAM+ Conformal Revolution [0.16874375111244327]
  FedNAM+ is a federated learning framework that integrates Neural Additive Models (NAMs) with a novel conformal prediction method.<n>Our method introduces a dynamic level adjustment technique that utilizes gradient-based sensitivity maps to identify key input features influencing predictions.<n>We validate our approach through experiments on CT scan, MNIST, and CIFAR datasets, demonstrating high prediction accuracy with minimal loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T02:06:14Z)
• SurvUnc: A Meta-Model Based Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Survival Analysis [8.413107141283502]
  Survival analysis is fundamental in numerous real-world applications, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and risk assessment.<n>Despite advances in numerous survival models, quantifying the uncertainty of predictions remains underexplored and challenging.<n>We introduce SurvUnc, a novel meta-model based framework for post-hoc uncertainty quantification for survival models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T18:12:20Z)
• ProMind-LLM: Proactive Mental Health Care via Causal Reasoning with Sensor Data [5.961343130822046]
  Mental health risk is a critical global public health challenge.<n>With the development of large language models (LLMs), they stand out to be a promising tool for explainable mental health care applications.<n>This paper introduces ProMind-LLM, an innovative approach integrating objective behavior data as complementary information alongside subjective mental records.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T07:36:28Z)
• Enhancing LLM Reliability via Explicit Knowledge Boundary Modeling [41.19330514054401]
  Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucination stemming from misaligned self-awareness.<n>We propose the Explicit Knowledge Boundary Modeling framework to integrate fast and slow reasoning systems to harmonize reliability and usability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:16:02Z)
• Enhancing Trust in Large Language Models with Uncertainty-Aware Fine-Tuning [10.457661605916435]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of natural language processing with their impressive reasoning and question-answering capabilities.<n>LLMs are sometimes prone to generating credible-sounding but incorrect information, a phenomenon known as hallucinations.<n>We introduce a novel uncertainty-aware causal language modeling loss function, grounded in the principles of decision theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T23:14:47Z)
• On the Fairness, Diversity and Reliability of Text-to-Image Generative Models [68.62012304574012]
  multimodal generative models have sparked critical discussions on their reliability, fairness and potential for misuse.<n>We propose an evaluation framework to assess model reliability by analyzing responses to global and local perturbations in the embedding space.<n>Our method lays the groundwork for detecting unreliable, bias-injected models and tracing the provenance of embedded biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T09:46:55Z)
• Reliability-Aware Prediction via Uncertainty Learning for Person Image Retrieval [51.83967175585896]
  UAL aims at providing reliability-aware predictions by considering data uncertainty and model uncertainty simultaneously. Data uncertainty captures the noise" inherent in the sample, while model uncertainty depicts the model's confidence in the sample's prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T17:53:20Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.