SoftPipe: A Soft-Guided Reinforcement Learning Framework for Automated Data Preparation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13710v2
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 10:45:43 GMT
- Title: SoftPipe: A Soft-Guided Reinforcement Learning Framework for Automated Data Preparation
- Abstract summary: We introduce SoftPipe, a novel RL framework that replaces rigid hard constraints'' with a flexible soft guidance'' paradigm.<n>We demonstrate that SoftPipe achieves up to a 13.9% improvement in pipeline quality and 2.8$times$ faster convergence compared to existing methods.
- Score: 10.764970149373845
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Data preparation is a foundational yet notoriously challenging component of the machine learning lifecycle, characterized by a vast combinatorial search space. While reinforcement learning (RL) offers a promising direction, state-of-the-art methods suffer from a critical limitation: to manage the search space, they rely on rigid ``hard constraints'' that prematurely prune the search space and often preclude optimal solutions. To address this, we introduce SoftPipe, a novel RL framework that replaces these constraints with a flexible ``soft guidance'' paradigm. SoftPipe formulates action selection as a Bayesian inference problem. A high-level strategic prior, generated by a Large Language Model (LLM), probabilistically guides exploration. This prior is combined with empirical estimators from two sources through a collaborative process: a fine-grained quality score from a supervised Learning-to-Rank (LTR) model and a long-term value estimate from the agent's Q-function. Through extensive experiments on 18 diverse datasets, we demonstrate that SoftPipe achieves up to a 13.9\% improvement in pipeline quality and 2.8$\times$ faster convergence compared to existing methods.
Related papers
- OpenSearch-VL: An Open Recipe for Frontier Multimodal Search Agents [50.79529228477821]
We introduce OpenSearch-VL, a fully open-source recipe for training frontier multimodal deep search agents with agentic reinforcement learning.<n>First, we curated a dedicated pipeline to construct high-quality training data through Wikipedia path sampling, fuzzy entity rewriting, and source-anchor visual grounding.<n>Besides, we design a diverse tool environment that unifies text search, image search, OCR, cropping, sharpening, super-resolution, and perspective correction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-06T17:50:38Z) - $S^3$-R1: Learning to Retrieve and Answer Step-by-Step with Synthetic Data [2.003941363902692]
We introduce S3-R1 (Synthetic data and stabilized Search R1), a framework that couples a datacentric approach with denser learning signals.<n>We first develop a synthetic generation and pipeline that derives diverse, multi-hop questions from existing documents.<n>We then pair this expanded training set with a reward structure that evaluates both intermediate search quality and the correctness final answer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-02T05:01:05Z) - FutureMind: Equipping Small Language Models with Strategic Thinking-Pattern Priors via Adaptive Knowledge Distillation [13.855534865501369]
Small Language Models (SLMs) are attractive for cost-sensitive and resource-limited settings due to their efficient, low-latency inference.<n>We propose FutureMind, a modular reasoning framework that equips SLMs with strategic thinking-pattern priors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T13:26:04Z) - Beyond Fast and Slow: Cognitive-Inspired Elastic Reasoning for Large Language Models [39.03483371038282]
CogER is a framework inspired by human hierarchical reasoning.<n>For queries requiring external tools, we introduce Cognitive Tool-Assisted Reasoning.<n>CogER outperforms state-of-the-art Test-Time scaling methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-17T05:11:58Z) - VADE: Variance-Aware Dynamic Sampling via Online Sample-Level Difficulty Estimation for Multimodal RL [38.782188833641676]
Group-based policy optimization methods like GRPO and GSPO have become standard for training multimodal models.<n>They suffer from a critical emphgradient vanishing problem when all responses within a group receive identical rewards.<n>We propose textbfVADE, a sampling framework via online sample-level difficulty textbfEstimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-24T08:59:54Z) - PROPA: Toward Process-level Optimization in Visual Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [30.44007644340425]
We introduce PROPA, a novel framework that integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with GRPO to generate dense, process-level rewards and optimize reasoning at each intermediate step without human annotations.<n>Across seven benchmarks and four VLM backbones, PROPA consistently outperforms both SFT- and RLVR-based baselines.<n>It achieves up to 17.0% gains on in-domain tasks and 21.0% gains on out-of-domain tasks compared to existing state-of-the-art.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T13:06:12Z) - Empowering RepoQA-Agent based on Reinforcement Learning Driven by Monte-carlo Tree Search [70.63903518295785]
We introduce RepoSearch-R1, a novel agentic reinforcement learning framework driven by Monte-carlo Tree Search.<n>Based on RepoSearch-R1, we construct a RepoQA-Agent specifically designed for repository question-answering tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-30T09:10:36Z) - Learning to Condition: A Neural Heuristic for Scalable MPE Inference [7.287294240824019]
We introduce learning to condition (L2C), a scalable, data-driven framework for accelerating Most Probable Explanation (MPE) inference.<n>L2C trains a neural network to score variable-value assignments based on their utility for conditioning, given observed evidence.<n>We develop a scalable data generation pipeline that extracts training signals from the search traces of existing MPE solvers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-22T18:24:31Z) - Towards Efficient Multi-LLM Inference: Characterization and Analysis of LLM Routing and Hierarchical Techniques [14.892995952768352]
Language Models (LMs) have excelled at tasks like text generation, summarization, and question answering.<n>Their inference remains computationally expensive and energy intensive in settings with limited hardware, power, or bandwidth.<n>Recent approaches have introduced multi LLM intelligent model selection strategies that dynamically allocate computational resources based on query complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T23:13:08Z) - SimpleDeepSearcher: Deep Information Seeking via Web-Powered Reasoning Trajectory Synthesis [89.99161034065614]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems have advanced large language models (LLMs) in complex deep search scenarios.<n>Existing approaches face critical limitations that lack high-quality training trajectories and suffer from distributional mismatches.<n>This paper introduces SimpleDeepSearcher, a framework that bridges the gap through strategic data engineering rather than complex training paradigms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T16:05:02Z) - Comprehend, Divide, and Conquer: Feature Subspace Exploration via Multi-Agent Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning [10.317489871533565]
In this paper, we introduce HRLFS, a reinforcement learning-based subspace exploration strategy for complex datasets.<n>We show that HRLFS improves the downstream machine learning performance with iterative feature subspace exploration.<n>We also show that HRLFS accelerates total run time by reducing the number of agents involved.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-24T08:16:36Z) - Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z) - R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [87.30285670315334]
textbfR1-Searcher is a novel two-stage outcome-based RL approach designed to enhance the search capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Our framework relies exclusively on RL, without requiring process rewards or distillation for a cold start.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous strong RAG methods, even when compared to the closed-source GPT-4o-mini.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T17:14:44Z) - Entropy-Regularized Token-Level Policy Optimization for Language Agent Reinforcement [67.1393112206885]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise as intelligent agents in interactive decision-making tasks.
We introduce Entropy-Regularized Token-level Policy Optimization (ETPO), an entropy-augmented RL method tailored for optimizing LLMs at the token level.
We assess the effectiveness of ETPO within a simulated environment that models data science code generation as a series of multi-step interactive tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-09T07:45:26Z) - Understanding, Predicting and Better Resolving Q-Value Divergence in
Offline-RL [86.0987896274354]
We first identify a fundamental pattern, self-excitation, as the primary cause of Q-value estimation divergence in offline RL.
We then propose a novel Self-Excite Eigenvalue Measure (SEEM) metric to measure the evolving property of Q-network at training.
For the first time, our theory can reliably decide whether the training will diverge at an early stage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-06T17:57:44Z) - DQ-LoRe: Dual Queries with Low Rank Approximation Re-ranking for
In-Context Learning [66.85379279041128]
In this study, we introduce a framework that leverages Dual Queries and Low-rank approximation Re-ranking to automatically select exemplars for in-context learning.
DQ-LoRe significantly outperforms prior state-of-the-art methods in the automatic selection of exemplars for GPT-4, enhancing performance from 92.5% to 94.2%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T16:44:37Z) - PEAR: Primitive Enabled Adaptive Relabeling for Boosting Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning [25.84621883831624]
Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) has the potential to solve complex long horizon tasks using temporal abstraction and increased exploration.<n>We present primitive enabled adaptive relabeling (PEAR)<n>We first perform adaptive relabeling on a few expert demonstrations to generate efficient subgoal supervision.<n>We then jointly optimize HRL agents by employing reinforcement learning (RL) and imitation learning (IL)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-10T09:41:30Z) - Hierarchically Structured Task-Agnostic Continual Learning [0.0]
We take a task-agnostic view of continual learning and develop a hierarchical information-theoretic optimality principle.
We propose a neural network layer, called the Mixture-of-Variational-Experts layer, that alleviates forgetting by creating a set of information processing paths.
Our approach can operate in a task-agnostic way, i.e., it does not require task-specific knowledge, as is the case with many existing continual learning algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-14T19:53:15Z) - Provable Hierarchy-Based Meta-Reinforcement Learning [50.17896588738377]
We analyze HRL in the meta-RL setting, where learner learns latent hierarchical structure during meta-training for use in a downstream task.
We provide "diversity conditions" which, together with a tractable optimism-based algorithm, guarantee sample-efficient recovery of this natural hierarchy.
Our bounds incorporate common notions in HRL literature such as temporal and state/action abstractions, suggesting that our setting and analysis capture important features of HRL in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-18T17:56:02Z) - Q-Learning Lagrange Policies for Multi-Action Restless Bandits [35.022322303796216]
Multi-action restless multi-armed bandits (RMABs) are a powerful framework for constrained resource allocation in which $N$ independent processes are managed.
We design the first algorithms for learning good policies for Multi-action RMABs online using combinations of Lagrangian relaxation and Q-learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-22T19:20:09Z) - Learning with Safety Constraints: Sample Complexity of Reinforcement
Learning for Constrained MDPs [13.922754427601491]
We characterize the relationship between safety constraints and the number of samples needed to ensure a desired level of accuracy.
Our main finding is that compared to the best known bounds of the unconstrained regime, the sample of constrained RL algorithms are increased by a factor that is logarithmic in the number of constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-01T18:17:08Z) - Combining Deep Learning and Optimization for Security-Constrained
Optimal Power Flow [94.24763814458686]
Security-constrained optimal power flow (SCOPF) is fundamental in power systems.
Modeling of APR within the SCOPF problem results in complex large-scale mixed-integer programs.
This paper proposes a novel approach that combines deep learning and robust optimization techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-14T12:38:21Z) - SUNRISE: A Simple Unified Framework for Ensemble Learning in Deep
Reinforcement Learning [102.78958681141577]
We present SUNRISE, a simple unified ensemble method, which is compatible with various off-policy deep reinforcement learning algorithms.
SUNRISE integrates two key ingredients: (a) ensemble-based weighted Bellman backups, which re-weight target Q-values based on uncertainty estimates from a Q-ensemble, and (b) an inference method that selects actions using the highest upper-confidence bounds for efficient exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-09T17:08:44Z) - Simultaneously Evolving Deep Reinforcement Learning Models using
Multifactorial Optimization [18.703421169342796]
This work proposes a framework capable of simultaneously evolving several DQL models towards solving interrelated Reinforcement Learning tasks.
A thorough experimentation is presented and discussed so as to assess the performance of the framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-25T10:36:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.