Semiparametric Efficient Test for Interpretable Distributional Treatment Effects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08034v1
• Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 17:23:34 GMT
• Title: Semiparametric Efficient Test for Interpretable Distributional Treatment Effects
• Abstract summary: Kernel tests can detect discrepancies between interventional outcome laws, but global tests do not reveal where the laws differ.<n>We propose DR-ME, to our knowledge the first semi principledally efficient finite-location test for interpretable distributional treatment effects.
• Score: 22.387735135790702
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Distributional treatment effects can be invisible to means: a treatment may preserve average outcomes while changing tails, modes, dispersion, or rare-event probabilities. Kernel tests can detect discrepancies between interventional outcome laws, but global tests do not reveal where the laws differ. We propose DR-ME, to our knowledge the first semiparametrically efficient finite-location test for interpretable distributional treatment effects. DR-ME evaluates an interventional kernel witness at learned outcome locations, returning causal-discrepancy coordinates rather than only a global rejection. From observational data, we derive orthogonal doubly robust kernel features whose centered oracle form is the canonical gradient of this finite witness. For fixed locations, we characterize the local testing limit: DR-ME is chi-square calibrated under the null, has noncentral chi-square local power, and uses the covariance whitening that optimizes local signal-to-noise for discrepancies visible through the selected coordinates. This efficient local-power geometry yields a principled location-learning criterion, with sample splitting preserving post-selection validity. Experiments show near-nominal type-I error, competitive power against global doubly robust kernel tests, and interpretable learned locations that localize distributional effects in a semi-synthetic medical-imaging study.

Related papers

• Distributionally Faithful Imputation via Positive Semi-Definite Kernel Density Estimation [55.47411235954028]
  We recast imputation under missing completely at random as density estimation from masked observations.<n>We obtain a convex empirical risk problem with closed form marginals, solvable by a Newton interior point method.<n>The resulting PSD Impute model yields both single and multiple imputations from the same fitted density.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T15:51:05Z)
• CANN-EUCLID: unsupervised constitutive artificial neural network model discovery from full-field data [0.0]
  Constitutive artificial neural networks (CANNs) provide interpretable material model discovery.<n>CANNs have so far been used in stress-inducing settings based on apparent stress-strain data from homogeneous tests.<n>Here, we combine CANNs with the stress-unsupervised full-field discovery framework EUCLID to identify sparse hyperelastic laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T15:44:06Z)
• Testing the Test: Score-Direction Instability in Class-Split Anomaly Detection [56.362776482614976]
  Within-dataset class-split evaluation is widely used as a proxy for fully unconditional out-of-distribution anomaly detection.<n>We show that this protocol can become ill-posed when the held-out anomaly class overlaps the normal mixture in representation space.<n>We introduce a simple training-free diagnostic, neighborhood class leakage, and show that it predicts score-direction instability across Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Imagenette.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T06:27:42Z)
• Improving RCT-Based Treatment Effect Estimation Under Covariate Mismatch via Calibrated Alignment [0.0]
  We propose CALM, which bypasses imputation by learning embeddings that map each source's features into a common representation space.<n> OS outcome models are transferred to the RCT embedding space and calibrated using trial data, preserving causal identification from randomization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T17:43:12Z)
• Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects: Doubly Robust Estimation and Testing [2.2566128651384454]
  We propose a novel estimand to capture conditional distributional treatment effects.<n>We develop a test for the global homogeneity of conditional potential outcome distributions.<n>We derive exact closed-form expressions for two natural discrepancies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T17:35:32Z)
• Estimating Total Effects in Bipartite Experiments with Spillovers and Partial Eligibility [5.914780964919124]
  We study randomized experiments in bipartite systems where only a subset of treatment-side units are eligible for assignment while all units continue to interact.<n>We formalize eligibility-constrained bipartite experiments and define estimands aligned with full deployment.<n>We develop interference-aware ensemble estimators that combine exposure mappings, generalized propensity scores, and flexible machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T18:55:51Z)
• An Orthogonal Learner for Individualized Outcomes in Markov Decision Processes [55.93922317950527]
  We develop a novel meta-learner called DRQ-learner.<n>Our DRQ-learner is applicable to settings with both discrete and continuous state spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T15:49:29Z)
• A Sample Efficient Conditional Independence Test in the Presence of Discretization [54.047334792855345]
  Conditional Independence (CI) tests directly to discretized data can lead to incorrect conclusions.<n>Recent advancements have sought to infer the correct CI relationship between the latent variables through binarizing observed data.<n>Motivated by this, this paper introduces a sample-efficient CI test that does not rely on the binarization process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T12:41:26Z)
• Counterfactual Realizability [52.85109506684737]
  We introduce a formal definition of realizability, the ability to draw samples from a distribution, and then develop a complete algorithm to determine whether an arbitrary counterfactual distribution is realizable.<n>We illustrate the implications of this new framework for counterfactual data collection using motivating examples from causal fairness and causal reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T20:54:27Z)
• Can We Validate Counterfactual Estimations in the Presence of General Network Interference? [13.49152464081862]
  We introduce a framework that facilitates the use of machine learning tools for both estimation and validation in causal inference.<n>New distribution-preserving network bootstrap generates statistically-valid subpopulations from a single experiment's data.<n>Counterfactual cross-validation procedure adapts the principles of model validation to the unique constraints of causal settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T06:51:04Z)
• Proximity Matters: Local Proximity Preserved Balancing for Treatment Effect Estimation [25.941696352770272]
  Heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) estimation from observational data poses significant challenges due to treatment selection bias. Existing methods address this bias by minimizing distribution discrepancies between treatment groups in latent space, focusing on global alignment. We propose Proximity-aware Counterfactual Regression (PCR) to exploit proximity for representation balancing within the HTE estimation context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T09:20:26Z)
• Hierarchical Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Contamination-Resistant Anomaly Detection [81.07346419422605]
  Anomaly detection aims at identifying deviant samples from the normal data distribution. Contrastive learning has provided a successful way to sample representation that enables effective discrimination on anomalies. We propose a novel hierarchical semi-supervised contrastive learning framework, for contamination-resistant anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-24T18:49:26Z)
• Log-Likelihood Ratio Minimizing Flows: Towards Robust and Quantifiable Neural Distribution Alignment [52.02794488304448]
  We propose a new distribution alignment method based on a log-likelihood ratio statistic and normalizing flows. We experimentally verify that minimizing the resulting objective results in domain alignment that preserves the local structure of input domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T22:10:04Z)
• Almost-Matching-Exactly for Treatment Effect Estimation under Network Interference [73.23326654892963]
  We propose a matching method that recovers direct treatment effects from randomized experiments where units are connected in an observed network. Our method matches units almost exactly on counts of unique subgraphs within their neighborhood graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T15:21:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.