Generating Leakage-Free Benchmarks for Robust RAG Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08838v1
• Date: Sat, 09 May 2026 09:48:50 GMT
• Title: Generating Leakage-Free Benchmarks for Robust RAG Evaluation
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely used to augment large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge.<n>Many benchmark datasets, designed to test RAG performance, comprise many questions that can already be answered from an LLM's parametric memory.<n>We introduce SeedRG, a semi-synthetic benchmark generation pipeline that mitigates knowledge leakage and addresses the issue of benchmark aging.
• Score: 21.380693848036547
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely used to augment large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge. However, many benchmark datasets, designed to test RAG performance, comprise many questions that can already be answered from an LLM's parametric memory. This leads to unreliable evaluation. We refer to this phenomenon as knowledge leakage: cases where RAG tasks are solvable without retrieval. This issue worsens over time due to benchmark aging. As benchmarks are reused for training, their contents are increasingly absorbed into model parameters, making them less effective for evaluating retrieval. We introduce SeedRG, a semi-synthetic benchmark generation pipeline that mitigates knowledge leakage and addresses the issue of benchmark aging. Starting from a seed benchmark dataset, SeedRG extracts a reasoning graph from question-context pairs to capture their underlying reasoning structure, and then generates new examples via type-constrained entity replacement. This process produces structurally similar but novel instances that are unlikely to exist in the model's parametric knowledge, while preserving the original reasoning patterns. To ensure quality, we incorporate two verification steps: (1) a reasoning-graph consistency check to maintain task difficulty, and (2) a knowledge-leakage filter to exclude instances answerable without retrieval.

Related papers

• BERAG: Bayesian Ensemble Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering [24.259268301904545]
  A common approach to question answering with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is to restrict documents into a single context and pass it to a language model to generate an answer.<n>This strategy obscures the contribution of individual documents, making attribution difficult and contributing to the lost-in-the-middle'' effect.<n>We propose a new RAG framework in which language models are conditioned on individual retrieved documents rather than a single combined context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T16:01:19Z)
• Transforming External Knowledge into Triplets for Enhanced Retrieval in RAG of LLMs [55.78708003681562]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates hallucination in large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge during generation.<n>Existing RAG approaches typically retrieve and unstructured text fragments as context.<n>We propose Tri-RAG, a structured triplet-based retrieval framework that improves retrieval efficiency through reasoning-aligned context construction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T11:36:29Z)
• Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage [89.58253972744531]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems combine document retrieval with a generative model to address complex information seeking tasks like report generation.<n>We investigate whether upstream retrieval metrics can serve as reliable early indicators of the final generated response's information coverage.<n>Our findings demonstrate strong correlations between coverage-based retrieval metrics and nugget coverage in generated responses at both topic and system levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T18:20:20Z)
• ReAG: Reasoning-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering [54.72902502486611]
  ReAG is a Reasoning-Augmented Multimodal RAG approach that combines coarse- and fine-grained retrieval with a critic model that filters irrelevant passages.<n>ReAG significantly outperforms prior methods, improving answer accuracy and providing interpretable reasoning grounded in retrieved evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T19:01:02Z)
• TeaRAG: A Token-Efficient Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework [62.66056331998838]
  TeaRAG is a token-efficient agentic RAG framework capable of compressing both retrieval content and reasoning steps.<n>Our reward function evaluates the knowledge sufficiency by a knowledge matching mechanism, while penalizing excessive reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T16:08:34Z)
• FrugalRAG: Learning to retrieve and reason for multi-hop QA [10.193015391271535]
  Large-scale fine-tuning is not needed to improve RAG metrics.<n>Supervised and RL-based fine-tuning can help RAG from the perspective of frugality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T11:02:13Z)
• Chain-of-Retrieval Augmented Generation [91.02950964802454]
  This paper introduces an approach for training o1-like RAG models that retrieve and reason over relevant information step by step before generating the final answer.<n>Our proposed method, CoRAG, allows the model to dynamically reformulate the query based on the evolving state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T09:12:52Z)
• Don't Do RAG: When Cache-Augmented Generation is All You Need for Knowledge Tasks [11.053340674721005]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has gained traction as a powerful approach for enhancing language models by integrating external knowledge sources.<n>This paper proposes an alternative paradigm, cache-augmented generation (CAG) that bypasses real-time retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T06:58:32Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• RQ-RAG: Learning to Refine Queries for Retrieval Augmented Generation [42.82192656794179]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable capabilities but are prone to generating inaccurate or hallucinatory responses. This limitation stems from their reliance on vast pretraining datasets, making them susceptible to errors in unseen scenarios. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this by incorporating external, relevant documents into the response generation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T08:58:54Z)
• Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation [36.04062963574603]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) relies heavily on relevance of retrieved documents, raising concerns about how the model behaves if retrieval goes wrong. We propose the Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation (CRAG) to improve the robustness of generation. CRAG is plug-and-play and can be seamlessly coupled with various RAG-based approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T04:36:39Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks [133.93803565077337]
  retrieval-augmented generation models combine pre-trained parametric and non-parametric memory for language generation. We show that RAG models generate more specific, diverse and factual language than a state-of-the-art parametric-only seq2seq baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-22T21:34:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.