Discriminative Span as a Predictor of Synthetic Data Utility via Classifier Reconstruction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09697v2
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 01:50:14 GMT
• Title: Discriminative Span as a Predictor of Synthetic Data Utility via Classifier Reconstruction
• Abstract summary: A widely adopted solution is to generate synthetic positive data using image-to-image transformations applied to negative samples.<n>We propose a geometry-driven metric that predicts the utility of synthetic data without requiring model training.<n>We show that this metric exhibits strong correlation with downstream classification performance of CNNs trained on mixtures of real negative and synthetic positive data.
• Score: 0.552480439325792
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In many real-world computer vision applications, including medical imaging and industrial inspection, binary classification tasks are characterized by a severe scarcity of positive samples. A widely adopted solution is to generate synthetic positive data using image-to-image transformations applied to negative samples. However, a fundamental challenge remains: how can we reliably assess whether such synthetic data will improve downstream model performance? In this work, we propose a geometry-driven metric that predicts the utility of synthetic data without requiring model training. Our approach operates in the embedding space of a pre-trained foundation model and represents the dataset through difference vectors between samples. We evaluate whether the weight vector of a linear classifier can be expressed within the subspace spanned by these variations by measuring the relative projection error. Intuitively, if the variations induced by synthetic data capture task-relevant directions, their span can approximate the classifier, resulting in low projection error. Conversely, poor synthetic data fails to span these directions, leading to higher error. Across multiple datasets and architectures, we show that this metric exhibits strong correlation with downstream classification performance of CNNs trained on mixtures of real negative and synthetic positive data. These findings suggest that the proposed metric serves as a practical and informative tool for evaluating synthetic data quality in data-scarce settings.

Related papers

• Training-Free Metrics for Synthetic Object Detection Data: A Proxy for Detector Performance [3.052250424013348]
  Conditional-Composition Domain Match (CCDM) serves as a proxy for the relative utility of candidate synthetic training sets for downstream detection.<n>Experiments on the VisDrone-DET dataset show that the CCDM metric families achieve a Spearman correlation of 1.0 with the downstream performance of YOLOv8.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T05:46:23Z)
• Bias-Corrected Data Synthesis for Imbalanced Learning [18.33651035966011]
  Imbalanced data, where the positive samples represent only a small proportion compared to the negative samples, makes it challenging for classification problems to balance the false positive and false negative rates.<n>A common approach to addressing the challenge involves generating synthetic data for the minority group and then training classification models with both observed and synthetic data.<n>In this paper, we address the bias introduced by synthetic data and provide consistent estimators for this bias by borrowing information from the majority group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T00:52:25Z)
• High-dimensional Analysis of Synthetic Data Selection [44.67519806837088]
  We show that, for linear models, the covariance shift between the target distribution and the distribution of the synthetic data affects the generalization error.<n>Remarkably, the theoretical insights from linear models carry over to deep neural networks and generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T12:06:31Z)
• Dataset Distillation with Probabilistic Latent Features [9.318549327568695]
  A compact set of synthetic data can effectively replace the original dataset in downstream classification tasks.<n>We propose a novel approach that models the joint distribution of latent features.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art cross architecture performance across a range of backbone architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-10T13:53:49Z)
• Enhancing Unsupervised Sentence Embeddings via Knowledge-Driven Data Augmentation and Gaussian-Decayed Contrastive Learning [23.098551349745815]
  We propose a pipeline-based data augmentation method via large language models (LLMs)<n>We introduce the Gaussian-decayed gradient-assisted Contrastive Sentence Embedding (GCSE) model to enhance unsupervised sentence embeddings.<n> Experimental results show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in semantic textual similarity tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T16:29:58Z)
• Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models [89.88010750772413]
  Synthetic data has been proposed as a solution to address the issue of high-quality data scarcity in the training of large language models (LLMs) Our work delves into these specific flaws associated with question-answer (Q-A) pairs, a prevalent type of synthetic data, and presents a method based on unlearning techniques to mitigate these flaws. Our work has yielded key insights into the effective use of synthetic data, aiming to promote more robust and efficient LLM training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T08:38:59Z)
• Beyond Model Collapse: Scaling Up with Synthesized Data Requires Verification [11.6055501181235]
  We investigate the use of verification on synthesized data to prevent model collapse. We show that verifiers, even imperfect ones, can indeed be harnessed to prevent model collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T17:46:16Z)
• Learning Defect Prediction from Unrealistic Data [57.53586547895278]
  Pretrained models of code have become popular choices for code understanding and generation tasks. Such models tend to be large and require commensurate volumes of training data. It has become popular to train models with far larger but less realistic datasets, such as functions with artificially injected bugs. Models trained on such data tend to only perform well on similar data, while underperforming on real world programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T01:51:43Z)
• From Fake to Real: Pretraining on Balanced Synthetic Images to Prevent Spurious Correlations in Image Recognition [64.59093444558549]
  We propose a simple, easy-to-implement, two-step training pipeline that we call From Fake to Real. By training on real and synthetic data separately, FFR does not expose the model to the statistical differences between real and synthetic data. Our experiments show that FFR improves worst group accuracy over the state-of-the-art by up to 20% over three datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T19:52:28Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• Boosting Differentiable Causal Discovery via Adaptive Sample Reweighting [62.23057729112182]
  Differentiable score-based causal discovery methods learn a directed acyclic graph from observational data. We propose a model-agnostic framework to boost causal discovery performance by dynamically learning the adaptive weights for the Reweighted Score function, ReScore.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T14:49:59Z)
• Minimizing the Accumulated Trajectory Error to Improve Dataset Distillation [151.70234052015948]
  We propose a novel approach that encourages the optimization algorithm to seek a flat trajectory. We show that the weights trained on synthetic data are robust against the accumulated errors perturbations with the regularization towards the flat trajectory. Our method, called Flat Trajectory Distillation (FTD), is shown to boost the performance of gradient-matching methods by up to 4.7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-20T15:49:11Z)
• SynBench: Task-Agnostic Benchmarking of Pretrained Representations using Synthetic Data [78.21197488065177]
  Recent success in fine-tuning large models, that are pretrained on broad data at scale, on downstream tasks has led to a significant paradigm shift in deep learning. This paper proposes a new task-agnostic framework, textitSynBench, to measure the quality of pretrained representations using synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T15:25:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.