A Theory of Multilevel Interactive Equilibrium in NeuroAI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10505v1
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 13:01:54 GMT
- Title: A Theory of Multilevel Interactive Equilibrium in NeuroAI
- Abstract summary: We propose a game-theoretic framework for adaptive multi-agent intelligent systems.<n>At its core, Multilevel Interactive Equilibrium generalizes the classical Nash equilibrium to intelligent systems with internal computation.<n>This framework applies uniformly to interactions between two biological brains, two artificial agents, or hybrid human-AI systems.
- Score: 18.678954408835157
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: We propose a game-theoretic framework for adaptive multi-agent intelligent systems. Unlike classical game theory, which often treats strategies as primitive objects chosen by perfectly rational agents, the proposed framework provides a mathematical foundation for studying equilibrium in NeuroAI and can be viewed as an extension of game theory under relaxed assumptions, including partial observability, bounded computation, and uncertainty. At its core, Multilevel Interactive Equilibrium (MIE) generalizes the classical Nash equilibrium to intelligent systems with internal computation. Rather than being defined solely at the level of observable behavior, equilibrium emerges when neural learning dynamics, cognitive representations, and behavioral strategies mutually stabilize between interacting agents. This framework applies uniformly to interactions between two biological brains, two artificial agents, or hybrid human-AI systems. We discuss applications of multilevel game theory to human-autonomous vehicle driving, human-machine interaction, human-large language model (LLM) interaction, and computational psychiatry. We also outline experimental strategies and computational methods for estimating MIE and discuss challenges and prospects for future research.
Related papers
- Adaptive Entangled Game Modules in Artificial General Intelligence [4.129809956451992]
We introduce a probability-wave framework for modeling the collective behavior of adaptive agents, deriving testable eigenmodes through a generalized behavioral intelligence (GBI) nonlocal probability-wave equation.<n>This framework captures a broad range of human intelligence behaviors with analytical mechanisms and offers an indirect method to examine the Liu-Chen-Ao (LCA) hypothesis of nonlocal entangled nerve fibers in the brain through collective trader behaviors.<n>Our results highlight the necessity of incorporating adaptive entangled game modules into artificial general intelligence (AGI) architectures, addressing the limitations of conventional artificial neural network (ANN)-based AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-07T09:44:12Z) - A game theory for foundation models shows new paths to rational cooperation through similarity inference [56.53805518668248]
We show that foundation model agents engaging in optimal planning consistently converge to stable cooperation.<n>By shifting from decoupled to embedded agency, these agents model themselves as part of the universe they inhabit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-04T17:24:33Z) - Embedded Universal Predictive Intelligence: a coherent framework for multi-agent learning [57.23345786304694]
We introduce a framework for prospective learning and embedded agency centered on self-prediction.<n>We show that in multi-agent settings, self-prediction enables agents to reason about others running similar algorithms.<n>We extend the theory of AIXI, and study universally intelligent embedded agents which start from a Solomonoff prior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T08:46:48Z) - Intelligence Foundation Model: A New Perspective to Approach Artificial General Intelligence [55.07411490538404]
We propose a new perspective for approaching artificial general intelligence (AGI) through an intelligence foundation model (IFM)<n>IFM aims to acquire the underlying mechanisms of intelligence by learning directly from diverse intelligent behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T09:28:41Z) - Approximating the Mathematical Structure of Psychodynamics [0.0]
We formalize human psychodynamics via the diagrammatic framework of process theory, describe its key properties, and explain the links between a diagrammatic representation and central concepts in analysis of cognitive processes in contexts such as psychotherapy, neurotechnology, AI alignment, AI agent representation of individuals in autonomous negotiations, developing human-like AI systems, and other aspects of AI safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-05T03:38:09Z) - Neuromorphic Intelligence [0.7638802020261348]
Neuromorphic computing seeks to replicate the remarkable efficiency, flexibility, and adaptability of the human brain in artificial systems.<n>Neuromorphic systems exploit brain-inspired principles of computation to achieve orders of magnitude greater energy efficiency.<n>A central challenge is to identify a unifying theoretical framework capable of bridging diverse disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-15T13:59:42Z) - Neural Brain: A Neuroscience-inspired Framework for Embodied Agents [78.61382193420914]
Current AI systems, such as large language models, remain disembodied, unable to physically engage with the world.<n>At the core of this challenge lies the concept of Neural Brain, a central intelligence system designed to drive embodied agents with human-like adaptability.<n>This paper introduces a unified framework for the Neural Brain of embodied agents, addressing two fundamental challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T15:05:34Z) - Nature's Insight: A Novel Framework and Comprehensive Analysis of Agentic Reasoning Through the Lens of Neuroscience [11.174550573411008]
We propose a novel neuroscience-inspired framework for agentic reasoning.<n>We apply this framework to systematically classify and analyze existing AI reasoning methods.<n>We propose new neural-inspired reasoning methods, analogous to chain-of-thought prompting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-07T14:25:46Z) - Brain-Model Evaluations Need the NeuroAI Turing Test [4.525325675715108]
The classical test proposed by Alan Turing focuses on behavior, requiring that an artificial agent's behavior be indistinguishable from that of a human.<n>This position paper argues that the standard definition of the Turing Test is incomplete for NeuroAI.<n>It proposes a stronger framework called the NeuroAI Turing Test'', a benchmark that extends beyond behavior alone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-22T14:16:28Z) - Mathematics of multi-agent learning systems at the interface of game
theory and artificial intelligence [0.8049333067399385]
Evolutionary Game Theory and Artificial Intelligence are two fields that, at first glance, might seem distinct, but they have notable connections and intersections.
The former focuses on the evolution of behaviors (or strategies) in a population, where individuals interact with others and update their strategies based on imitation (or social learning)
The latter, meanwhile, is centered on machine learning algorithms and (deep) neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-09T17:36:54Z) - Neural Amortized Inference for Nested Multi-agent Reasoning [54.39127942041582]
We propose a novel approach to bridge the gap between human-like inference capabilities and computational limitations.
We evaluate our method in two challenging multi-agent interaction domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-21T22:40:36Z) - Machine Psychology [54.287802134327485]
We argue that a fruitful direction for research is engaging large language models in behavioral experiments inspired by psychology.
We highlight theoretical perspectives, experimental paradigms, and computational analysis techniques that this approach brings to the table.
It paves the way for a "machine psychology" for generative artificial intelligence (AI) that goes beyond performance benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T13:24:41Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.