ConfoundingSHAP: Quantifying confounding strength in causal inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10533v1
• Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 13:19:33 GMT
• Title: ConfoundingSHAP: Quantifying confounding strength in causal inference
• Abstract summary: In causal inference, confounders are variables that influence both treatment decisions and outcomes.<n>We introduce ConfoundingSHAP, a Shapley-based method for attributing confounding strength to individual covariates.<n>We demonstrate the practical value across various datasets.
• Score: 70.18600230387723
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In causal inference, confounders are variables that influence both treatment decisions and outcomes. However, unlike as in randomized clinical trials, the treatment assignment mechanism in observational studies is not known, and it is thus unclear which covariates act as confounders. Here, we aim to generate insight for causal inference and answer: which of the observed covariates act as confounders? We introduce ConfoundingSHAP, a Shapley-based method for attributing confounding strength to individual covariates. Our contributions are twofold. First, we propose a Shapley game targeted to infer the confounding strength of the covariates. Our resulting Shapley values differ from the standard applications of SHAP explanations on causal targets, such as understanding treatment effect heterogeneity, which are ill-suited for our task. Second, as our task requires evaluating the value function over many adjustment sets, we provide a scalable TabPFN-based estimation that avoids exhaustive refitting. We demonstrate the practical value across various datasets, where ConfoundingSHAP provides informative explanations of which observed covariates drive confounding and thereby helps to provide more insight for causal inference in practice.

Related papers

• Causal Inference with Categorical Unobserved Confounder via Mixture Learning [20.542714966688656]
  We show that causal effects are identifiable when the unobserved confounder is categorical under suitable conditions.<n>We propose an estimation procedure based on tensor decomposition, which allows consistent recovery of the latent structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T18:28:16Z)
• Learning covariate importance for matching in policy-relevant observational research [2.6361497319422176]
  We propose the Priority-Aware one-to-one Matching Algorithm (PAMA)<n>It is a semi-supervised framework that learns a covariate importance measure from a subset data of units that are paired by experts and uses it to match additional units.<n>It is applied to a real-world study of in-person schooling and COVID-19 transmission.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T02:24:16Z)
• Causal Inference from Text: Unveiling Interactions between Variables [20.677407402398405]
  Existing methods only account for confounding covariables that affect both treatment and outcome. This bias arises from insufficient consideration of non-confounding covariables. In this work, we aim to mitigate the bias by unveiling interactions between different variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T11:29:44Z)
• Does Misclassifying Non-confounding Covariates as Confounders Affect the Causal Inference within the Potential Outcomes Framework? [4.074237603319893]
  The Potential Outcome Framework (POF) plays a prominent role in the field of causal inference. We present a unified graphical framework for the CIMs-POF, which greatly enhances the comprehension of these models' underlying principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T13:18:13Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Partial Identification of Dose Responses with Hidden Confounders [25.468473751289036]
  Inferring causal effects of continuous-valued treatments from observational data is a crucial task. We present novel methodology to bound both average and conditional average continuous-valued treatment-effect estimates. We apply our method to a real-world observational case study to demonstrate the value of identifying dose-dependent causal effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-24T07:02:21Z)
• Proximal Reinforcement Learning: Efficient Off-Policy Evaluation in Partially Observed Markov Decision Processes [65.91730154730905]
  In applications of offline reinforcement learning to observational data, such as in healthcare or education, a general concern is that observed actions might be affected by unobserved factors. Here we tackle this by considering off-policy evaluation in a partially observed Markov decision process (POMDP) We extend the framework of proximal causal inference to our POMDP setting, providing a variety of settings where identification is made possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-28T17:46:14Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Latent Causal Invariant Model [128.7508609492542]
  Current supervised learning can learn spurious correlation during the data-fitting process. We propose a Latent Causal Invariance Model (LaCIM) which pursues causal prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:00:27Z)
• Targeted VAE: Variational and Targeted Learning for Causal Inference [39.351088248776435]
  Undertaking causal inference with observational data is incredibly useful across a wide range of tasks. There are two significant challenges associated with undertaking causal inference using observational data. We address these two challenges by combining structured inference and targeted learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T16:55:24Z)
• Off-policy Evaluation in Infinite-Horizon Reinforcement Learning with Latent Confounders [62.54431888432302]
  We study an OPE problem in an infinite-horizon, ergodic Markov decision process with unobserved confounders. We show how, given only a latent variable model for states and actions, policy value can be identified from off-policy data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-27T22:19:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.