Causal Fairness for Survival Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11362v1
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 00:29:37 GMT
• Title: Causal Fairness for Survival Analysis
• Abstract summary: We develop a causal framework for fairness in survival/time-to-event analysis.<n>This provides a human-understandable explanation of why disparities arise and how they evolve over time.<n>Our approach is used to analyze the temporal evolution of racial disparities in outcome after admission to an intensive care unit.
• Score: 15.736899098702972
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the data-driven era, large-scale datasets are routinely collected and analyzed using machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) to inform decisions in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, employment, and criminal justice, raising concerns about the fairness behavior of these systems. Existing works in fair ML cover tasks such as bias detection, fair prediction, and fair decision-making, but largely focus on static settings. At the same time, fairness in temporal contexts, particularly survival/time-to-event (TTE) analysis, remains relatively underexplored, with current approaches to fair survival analysis adopting statistical fairness definitions, which, even with unlimited data, cannot disentangle the causal mechanisms that generate disparities. To address this gap, we develop a causal framework for fairness in TTE analysis, enabling the decomposition of disparities in survival into contributions from direct, indirect, and spurious pathways. This provides a human-understandable explanation of why disparities arise and how they evolve over time. Our non-parametric approach proceeds in four steps: (1) formalizing the necessary assumptions about censoring and lack of confounding using a graphical model; (2) recovering the conditional survival function given covariates; (3) applying the Causal Reduction Theorem to reframe the problem in a form amenable to causal pathway decomposition; (4) estimating the effects efficiently. Finally, our approach is used to analyze the temporal evolution of racial disparities in outcome after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU).

Related papers

• The Dead Salmons of AI Interpretability [9.722180905657268]
  In AI interpretability, reports of similar ''dead salmon'' artifacts abound.<n>We argue for a pragmatic statistical-causal reframing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T16:07:44Z)
• SurvDiff: A Diffusion Model for Generating Synthetic Data in Survival Analysis [34.89334607334426]
  Survival analysis is a cornerstone of clinical research by modeling time-to-event outcomes such as metastasis, disease relapse, or patient death.<n>SurvDiff is an end-to-end diffusion model specifically designed for generating synthetic data in survival analysis.<n>We show that survdiff consistently outperforms state-of-the-art generative baselines in both distributional fidelity and downstream evaluation metrics across multiple medical datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T13:50:29Z)
• Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects [62.56890808004615]
  We propose a novel partial identification framework that enables researchers to answer key questions.<n>Is the causal effect positive or negative? and How severe must assumption violations be to overturn this conclusion?<n>We apply our framework to the Project STAR study, which investigates the effect of classroom size on students' third-grade standardized test performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T07:13:01Z)
• Fairness in Survival Analysis: A Novel Conditional Mutual Information Augmentation Approach [8.049552305668959]
  We introduce a new fairness concept: equalized odds (EO) in survival analysis, which emphasizes prediction fairness at pre-defined time points.<n>Our Conditional Mutual Information Augmentation (CMIA) approach can effectively balance prediction accuracy and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T18:40:38Z)
• Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspective [58.06306331390586]
  We analyze the tension between fairness and accuracy from a causal lens for the first time.<n>We show that enforcing a causal constraint often reduces the disparity between demographic groups.<n>We introduce a new neural approach for causally-constrained fair learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T11:19:52Z)
• On the Identification of Temporally Causal Representation with Instantaneous Dependence [50.14432597910128]
  Temporally causal representation learning aims to identify the latent causal process from time series observations. Most methods require the assumption that the latent causal processes do not have instantaneous relations. We propose an textbfIDentification framework for instantanetextbfOus textbfLatent dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:08:05Z)
• DAGnosis: Localized Identification of Data Inconsistencies using Structures [73.39285449012255]
  Identification and appropriate handling of inconsistencies in data at deployment time is crucial to reliably use machine learning models. We use directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to encode the training set's features probability distribution and independencies as a structure. Our method, called DAGnosis, leverages these structural interactions to bring valuable and insightful data-centric conclusions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T11:29:16Z)
• Interpretable Survival Analysis for Heart Failure Risk Prediction [50.64739292687567]
  We propose a novel survival analysis pipeline that is both interpretable and competitive with state-of-the-art survival models. Our pipeline achieves state-of-the-art performance and provides interesting and novel insights about risk factors for heart failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T02:56:05Z)
• Contrastive Learning of Temporal Distinctiveness for Survival Analysis in Electronic Health Records [10.192973297290136]
  We propose a novel Ontology-aware Temporality-based Contrastive Survival (OTCSurv) analysis framework. OTCSurv uses survival durations from both censored and observed data to define temporal distinctiveness. We conduct experiments using a large EHR dataset to forecast the risk of hospitalized patients who are in danger of developing acute kidney injury (AKI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T22:36:22Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• Flexible Group Fairness Metrics for Survival Analysis [0.0]
  We explore how to utilise existing survival metrics to measure bias with group fairness metrics. We find that measures of discrimination are able to capture bias well whereas there is less clarity with measures of calibration and scoring rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T20:55:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.