Fairness in Survival Analysis: A Novel Conditional Mutual Information Augmentation Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02567v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 18:40:38 GMT
• Title: Fairness in Survival Analysis: A Novel Conditional Mutual Information Augmentation Approach
• Authors: Tianyang Xie, Yong Ge,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new fairness concept: equalized odds (EO) in survival analysis, which emphasizes prediction fairness at pre-defined time points. Our Conditional Mutual Information Augmentation (CMIA) approach can effectively balance prediction accuracy and fairness.
• Score: 8.049552305668959
• License:
• Abstract: Survival analysis, a vital tool for predicting the time to event, has been used in many domains such as healthcare, criminal justice, and finance. Like classification tasks, survival analysis can exhibit bias against disadvantaged groups, often due to biases inherent in data or algorithms. Several studies in both the IS and CS communities have attempted to address fairness in survival analysis. However, existing methods often overlook the importance of prediction fairness at pre-defined evaluation time points, which is crucial in real-world applications where decision making often hinges on specific time frames. To address this critical research gap, we introduce a new fairness concept: equalized odds (EO) in survival analysis, which emphasizes prediction fairness at pre-defined time points. To achieve the EO fairness in survival analysis, we propose a Conditional Mutual Information Augmentation (CMIA) approach, which features a novel fairness regularization term based on conditional mutual information and an innovative censored data augmentation technique. Our CMIA approach can effectively balance prediction accuracy and fairness, and it is applicable to various survival models. We evaluate the CMIA approach against several state-of-the-art methods within three different application domains, and the results demonstrate that CMIA consistently reduces prediction disparity while maintaining good accuracy and significantly outperforms the other competing methods across multiple datasets and survival models (e.g., linear COX, deep AFT).

Related papers

• Targeted Data Fusion for Causal Survival Analysis Under Distribution Shift [46.84912148188679]
  Causal inference has the potential to improve the generalizability, transportability, and replicability of scientific findings. Existing data fusion methods focus on binary or continuous outcomes. We propose two novel approaches for multi-source causal survival analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T23:21:25Z)
• Survival Models: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Risks [6.9648613217501705]
  SurvivalBoost outperforms 12 state-of-the-art models on 4 real-life datasets. It provides great calibration, the ability to predict across any time horizon, and computation times faster than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T07:33:34Z)
• CenTime: Event-Conditional Modelling of Censoring in Survival Analysis [49.44664144472712]
  We introduce CenTime, a novel approach to survival analysis that directly estimates the time to event. Our method features an innovative event-conditional censoring mechanism that performs robustly even when uncensored data is scarce. Our results indicate that CenTime offers state-of-the-art performance in predicting time-to-death while maintaining comparable ranking performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T17:07:33Z)
• Contrastive Learning of Temporal Distinctiveness for Survival Analysis in Electronic Health Records [10.192973297290136]
  We propose a novel Ontology-aware Temporality-based Contrastive Survival (OTCSurv) analysis framework. OTCSurv uses survival durations from both censored and observed data to define temporal distinctiveness. We conduct experiments using a large EHR dataset to forecast the risk of hospitalized patients who are in danger of developing acute kidney injury (AKI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T22:36:22Z)
• Regions of Reliability in the Evaluation of Multivariate Probabilistic Forecasts [73.33395097728128]
  We provide the first systematic finite-sample study of proper scoring rules for time-series forecasting evaluation. We carry out our analysis on a comprehensive synthetic benchmark, specifically designed to test several key discrepancies between ground-truth and forecast distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T17:38:42Z)
• Systematic Evaluation of Predictive Fairness [60.0947291284978]
  Mitigating bias in training on biased datasets is an important open problem. We examine the performance of various debiasing methods across multiple tasks. We find that data conditions have a strong influence on relative model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T05:40:13Z)
• Flexible Group Fairness Metrics for Survival Analysis [0.0]
  We explore how to utilise existing survival metrics to measure bias with group fairness metrics. We find that measures of discrimination are able to capture bias well whereas there is less clarity with measures of calibration and scoring rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T20:55:55Z)
• Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Spatiotemporal Forecasting [67.77102283276409]
  We describe two types of forecasting problems: regular grid-based and graph-based. We analyze UQ methods from both the Bayesian and the frequentist point view, casting in a unified framework via statistical decision theory. Through extensive experiments on real-world road network traffic, epidemics, and air quality forecasting tasks, we reveal the statistical computational trade-offs for different UQ methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-25T14:35:46Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)
• Variational Learning of Individual Survival Distributions [21.40142425105635]
  We introduce a variational time-to-event prediction model, named Variational Survival Inference (VSI), which builds upon recent advances in distribution learning techniques and deep neural networks. To validate effectiveness of our approach, an extensive set of experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets is carried out, showing improved performance relative to competing solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-09T22:09:51Z)
• Survival Cluster Analysis [93.50540270973927]
  There is an unmet need in survival analysis for identifying subpopulations with distinct risk profiles. An approach that addresses this need is likely to improve characterization of individual outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-29T22:41:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.