Beyond Inefficiency: Systemic Costs of Incivility in Multi-Agent Monte Carlo Simulations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11789v1
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 08:54:03 GMT
• Title: Beyond Inefficiency: Systemic Costs of Incivility in Multi-Agent Monte Carlo Simulations
• Abstract summary: We use Large Language Model (LLM) based Multi-Agent Systems as a controlled sociological sandbox.<n>We generate thousands of structured 1-on-1 adversarial debates across varying toxicity conditions.<n>We identify a significant first-mover advantage, whereby the agent initiating the discussion wins significantly above chance regardless of toxicity condition.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Unconstructive debate and uncivil communication carry well-documented costs for productivity and cohesion, yet isolating their effect on operational efficiency has proven difficult. Human subject research in this domain is constrained by ethical oversight, limited reproducibility, and the inherent unpredictability of naturalistic settings. We address this gap by leveraging Large Language Model (LLM) based Multi-Agent Systems as a controlled sociological sandbox, enabling systematic manipulation of communicative behavior at scale. Using a Monte Carlo simulation framework, we generate thousands of structured 1-on-1 adversarial debates across varying toxicity conditions, measuring convergence time, defined as the number of rounds required to reach a conclusion, as a proxy for interactional efficiency. Building on a prior study, we replicate and extend its findings across two additional LLM agents of varying parameter size, allowing us to assess whether the effects of toxic behavior on debate dynamics generalize across model scale. The convergence latency of 25% reported in the previous study was confirmed. It was found that this latency is significantly bigger for models with fewer parameters. We further identify a significant first-mover advantage, whereby the agent initiating the discussion wins significantly above chance regardless of toxicity condition.

Related papers

• Predicting Causal Effects from Natural Language Queries using Structured Representations [7.749911374727115]
  We introduce a new large-scale benchmark consisting of more than 72,000 natural language questions aligned with experiment descriptions.<n>We then propose a two-step framework that first generates a synthetic structured representation of a query before predicting effect size using a supervised encoder model.<n>Experiments show that finetuning plays a crucial role in improving prediction performance, with absolute error reducing by -27% up to -71% compared to prompted out-of-the-box LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T09:04:07Z)
• Dynamics of Cognitive Heterogeneity: Investigating Behavioral Biases in Multi-Stage Supply Chains with LLM-Based Simulation [8.478223327809527]
  This study specifically analyzes the impact of cognitive heterogeneity on agent interactions.<n>We employ DeepSeek and GPT agents to systematically vary reasoning sophistication across supply chain tiers.<n>Results indicate that agents exhibit myopic and self-interested behaviors that exacerbate systemic inefficiencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-19T03:03:25Z)
• Towards Real-world Human Behavior Simulation: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Long-horizon, Cross-scenario, Heterogeneous Behavior Traces [81.41397370235102]
  We introduce OmniBehavior, the first user simulation benchmark constructed entirely from real-world data.<n>We show that current models struggle to accurately simulate complex behaviors, with performance plateauing even as context windows expand.<n>This results in the loss of individual differences and long-tail behaviors, highlighting critical directions for future high-fidelity simulation research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T15:26:21Z)
• Position: AI Agents Are Not (Yet) a Panacea for Social Simulation [62.891898598784415]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have spurred growing interest in using LLM-integrated agents for social simulation.<n>This position paper argues that LLM-based agents are not (yet) a panacea for social simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T06:35:07Z)
• Quantifying the Lifelong Impact of Resilience Interventions via Agent-Based LLM Simulation [0.0]
  This paper introduces Large-Scale Agent-based Longitudinal Simulation (LALS), a framework that simulates multi-decade, counterfactual life trajectories.<n>The simulation models the efficacy of extended psychological resilience training (Intervention vs. Control) either in childhood or as a young adult (age 6 vs. age 18)<n>The simulation provides a quantitative, causal estimate of a resilience intervention's lifelong effects, revealing significant reductions in mortality, a lower incidence of dementia, and a substantial increase in accumulated wealth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T16:51:22Z)
• The High Cost of Incivility: Quantifying Interaction Inefficiency via Multi-Agent Monte Carlo Simulations [0.0]
  This study leverages Large Language Model (LLM) based Multi-Agent Systems to simulate 1-on-1 adversarial debates.<n>We employ a Monte Carlo method to simulate hundrets of discussions, measuring the convergence time.<n>We propose that this "latency of toxicity" serves as a proxy for financial damage in corporate and academic settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T08:17:35Z)
• Peacemaker or Troublemaker: How Sycophancy Shapes Multi-Agent Debate [30.66779902590191]
  Large language models (LLMs) often display sycophancy, a tendency toward excessive agreeability.<n>LLMs' inherent sycophancy can collapse debates into premature consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-27T02:27:13Z)
• Disagreements in Reasoning: How a Model's Thinking Process Dictates Persuasion in Multi-Agent Systems [49.69773210844221]
  This paper challenges the prevailing hypothesis that persuasive efficacy is primarily a function of model scale.<n>Through a series of multi-agent persuasion experiments, we uncover a fundamental trade-off we term the Persuasion Duality.<n>Our findings reveal that the reasoning process in LRMs exhibits significantly greater resistance to persuasion, maintaining their initial beliefs more robustly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T12:03:10Z)
• Revisiting Multi-Agent Debate as Test-Time Scaling: A Systematic Study of Conditional Effectiveness [50.29739337771454]
  Multi-agent debate (MAD) approaches offer improved reasoning, robustness, and diverse perspectives over monolithic models.<n>This paper conceptualizes MAD as a test-time computational scaling technique, distinguished by collaborative refinement and diverse exploration capabilities.<n>We conduct a comprehensive empirical investigation comparing MAD with strong self-agent test-time scaling baselines on mathematical reasoning and safety-related tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T01:02:55Z)
• Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives [51.19592551510628]
  We investigate the interaction between world knowledge and logical reasoning.<n>We find that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) often rely on superficial generalizations.<n>We show that simple reformulations of the task can elicit more robust reasoning behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:48:58Z)
• GenSim: A General Social Simulation Platform with Large Language Model based Agents [111.00666003559324]
  We propose a novel large language model (LLMs)-based simulation platform called textitGenSim.<n>Our platform supports one hundred thousand agents to better simulate large-scale populations in real-world contexts.<n>To our knowledge, GenSim represents an initial step toward a general, large-scale, and correctable social simulation platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T05:02:23Z)
• CausalDialogue: Modeling Utterance-level Causality in Conversations [83.03604651485327]
  We have compiled and expanded upon a new dataset called CausalDialogue through crowd-sourcing. This dataset includes multiple cause-effect pairs within a directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure. We propose a causality-enhanced method called Exponential Average Treatment Effect (ExMATE) to enhance the impact of causality at the utterance level in training neural conversation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T18:31:50Z)
• Quantify the Causes of Causal Emergence: Critical Conditions of Uncertainty and Asymmetry in Causal Structure [0.5372002358734439]
  Investigation of causal relationships based on statistical and informational theories have posed an interesting and valuable challenge to large-scale models. This paper introduces a framework for assessing numerical conditions of Causal Emergence as theoretical constraints of its occurrence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-03T06:35:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.