Events as Triggers for Behavioral Diversity in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12388v2
• Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 11:22:03 GMT
• Title: Events as Triggers for Behavioral Diversity in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: We argue that, to define these behavioral transitions, the missing ingredient is $textbfevents$.<n>We introduce a framework that decouples agent identity from behavior, capturing a continuous manifold from which agents instantiate their behaviors in response to events.
• Score: 10.867011075689879
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Effective multi-agent cooperation requires agents to adopt diverse behaviors as task conditions evolve-and to do so at the right moment. Yet, current Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) frameworks that facilitate this diversity are still limited by the fact that they bind fixed behaviors to fixed agent identities. Consequently, they are ill-equipped for tasks where agents need to take on different roles at very specific moments in time. We argue that, to define these behavioral transitions, the missing ingredient is $\textbf{events}$. Events are changes in the state of the system that induce qualitative changes in the task. Based on this view, we introduce a framework that decouples agent identity from behavior, capturing a continuous manifold from which agents instantiate their behaviors in response to events. This framework is based on two elements. First, to build an expressive behavior manifold, we introduce Neural Manifold Diversity (NMD), a formal distance metric that remains well-defined when behaviors are transient and agent-agnostic. Second, we use an event-based hypernetwork that generates Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) modules over a shared team policy, enabling on-the-fly agent-policy reconfiguration in response to events. We prove that this construction ensures that diversity does not interfere with reward maximization by design. Empirical results demonstrate that our framework outperforms established baselines across benchmarks while exhibiting zero-shot generalization, and being the only method that solves tasks requiring sequential behavior reassignment.

Related papers

• Do Agents Know When They Succeed? Calibrating Agent Confidence from Internal Representations [0.09085204695117637]
  In comparison to the traditional machine learning systems, agentic have complex failure modes with planning, tool invocation and dynamic environment interactions.<n>We investigate whether model's internal representations provide stronger signals of eventual task success in multi-turn agentic setups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-08T20:58:49Z)
• Experience as a Compass: Multi-agent RAG with Evolving Orchestration and Agent Prompts [22.323342919724492]
  HERA is a hierarchical framework that jointly evolves multi-agent orchestration and role-specific agent prompts.<n> HERA achieves an average improvement of 38.69% over recent baselines.<n>Topological analyses reveal emergent self-organization, where sparse exploration yields compact, high-utility multi-agent networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T13:45:52Z)
• MARTI-MARS$^2$: Scaling Multi-Agent Self-Search via Reinforcement Learning for Code Generation [64.2621682259008]
  Multi-Agent Reinforced Training and Inference Framework with Self-Search Scaling (MARTI-MARS2)<n>We propose a Multi-Agent Reinforced Training and Inference Framework with Self-Search Scaling (MARTI-MARS2) to integrate policy learning with multi-agent tree search.<n>We show that MARTI-MARS2 achieves 77.7%, outperforming strong baselines like GPT-5.1 on challenging code generation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T07:28:44Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• DCIR: Dynamic Consistency Intrinsic Reward for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [84.22561239481901]
  We propose a new approach that enables agents to learn whether their behaviors should be consistent with that of other agents. We evaluate DCIR in multiple environments including Multi-agent Particle, Google Research Football and StarCraft II Micromanagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T06:03:57Z)
• AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors [93.38830440346783]
  We propose a multi-agent framework framework that can collaboratively adjust its composition as a greater-than-the-sum-of-its-parts system. Our experiments demonstrate that framework framework can effectively deploy multi-agent groups that outperform a single agent. In view of these behaviors, we discuss some possible strategies to leverage positive ones and mitigate negative ones for improving the collaborative potential of multi-agent groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T16:47:11Z)
• Policy Diagnosis via Measuring Role Diversity in Cooperative Multi-agent RL [107.58821842920393]
  We quantify the agent's behavior difference and build its relationship with the policy performance via bf Role Diversity We find that the error bound in MARL can be decomposed into three parts that have a strong relation to the role diversity. The decomposed factors can significantly impact policy optimization on three popular directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T04:58:52Z)
• LDSA: Learning Dynamic Subtask Assignment in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [122.47938710284784]
  We propose a novel framework for learning dynamic subtask assignment (LDSA) in cooperative MARL. To reasonably assign agents to different subtasks, we propose an ability-based subtask selection strategy. We show that LDSA learns reasonable and effective subtask assignment for better collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T10:46:16Z)
• BGC: Multi-Agent Group Belief with Graph Clustering [1.9949730506194252]
  We propose a semi-communication method to enable agents can exchange information without communication. Inspired by the neighborhood cognitive consistency, we propose a group-based module to divide adjacent agents into a small group and minimize in-group agents' beliefs. Results reveal that the proposed method achieves a significant improvement in the SMAC benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-20T07:07:20Z)
• Randomized Entity-wise Factorization for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [59.62721526353915]
  Multi-agent settings in the real world often involve tasks with varying types and quantities of agents and non-agent entities. Our method aims to leverage these commonalities by asking the question: What is the expected utility of each agent when only considering a randomly selected sub-group of its observed entities?''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T18:28:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.