A Standardized Re-evaluation of Conversational Recommender Systems on the ReDial Dataset

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13053v2
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 09:14:55 GMT
• Title: A Standardized Re-evaluation of Conversational Recommender Systems on the ReDial Dataset
• Abstract summary: We revisit seven prominent CRS methods across three architectural families and evaluate them under standardized conditions.<n>Our study reveals a granularity gap'' where fine-grained ranking (Recall@1) is highly sensitive to implementation details.<n>Our replica analysis shows that nearly 50% of reported accuracy stems from repetition shortcuts'' that are absent in novelty-focused evaluation.
• Score: 16.676519749856567
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent years have seen a surge of research into conversational recommender systems (CRS). Among existing datasets, ReDial is the most widely used benchmark, cited in hundreds of studies. However, variations in how the dataset is preprocessed and used in experiments, particularly in the definition of ground-truth items, make it difficult to compare results across studies. These comparisons are further complicated by confounding factors such as the choice of the underlying large language model (LLM) and the use of external data sources. In this work, we revisit seven prominent CRS methods across three architectural families and evaluate them under standardized conditions. Our reproducibility study reveals a ``granularity gap,'' where fine-grained ranking (Recall@1) is highly sensitive to implementation details, while our replicability analysis shows that nearly 50% of reported accuracy stems from ``repetition shortcuts'' that are absent in novelty-focused evaluation. Furthermore, we find that performance gains are often driven more by the capacity of the LLM backbone than by specific architectural innovations. Finally, by applying user-centric utility metrics, we demonstrate that traditional recall frequently overstates a system's actual conversational effectiveness. This work establishes a transparent, controlled baseline and promotes evaluation practices that prioritize novelty and interaction efficiency.

Related papers

• A Reproducibility Study of LLM-Based Query Reformulation [21.129945396073264]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used for query reformulation and expansion in Information Retrieval.<n>We present a systematic and comparative study of ten representative LLM-based query reformulation methods under a unified and strictly controlled experimental framework.<n>Our results show that reformulation gains are strongly conditioned on the retrieval paradigm, that improvements under lexical retrieval do not consistently transfer to neural retrievers, and that larger LLMs do not uniformly yield better downstream performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T04:51:52Z)
• Investigating LLM Variability in Personalized Conversational Information Retrieval [14.220276130333849]
  Mo et al. explored several strategies for incorporating Personal Textual Knowledge Bases (PTKB) into Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We apply the original methods to a new TREC iKAT 2024 dataset and evaluate a diverse range of models, including Llama (1B-70B), Qwen-7B, GPT-4o-mini.<n>Our results show that human-selected PTKBs consistently enhance retrieval performance, while LLM-based selection methods do not reliably outperform manual choices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T12:13:19Z)
• ReGUIDE: Data Efficient GUI Grounding via Spatial Reasoning and Search [53.40810298627443]
  ReGUIDE is a framework for web grounding that enables MLLMs to learn data efficiently through self-generated reasoning and spatial-aware criticism.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that ReGUIDE significantly advances web grounding performance across multiple benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T08:36:18Z)
• Scenario-Wise Rec: A Multi-Scenario Recommendation Benchmark [65.13288661320364]
  We introduce our benchmark, textbfScenario-Wise Rec, which comprises 6 public datasets and 12 benchmark models, along with a training and evaluation pipeline.<n>We aim for this benchmark to offer researchers valuable insights from prior work, enabling the development of novel models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T08:15:34Z)
• Beyond the Numbers: Transparency in Relation Extraction Benchmark Creation and Leaderboards [5.632231145349045]
  This paper investigates the transparency in the creation of benchmarks and the use of leaderboards for measuring progress in NLP. Existing relation extraction benchmarks often suffer from insufficient documentation and lack crucial details. While our discussion centers on the transparency of RE benchmarks and leaderboards, the observations we discuss are broadly applicable to other NLP tasks as well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T22:36:19Z)
• Revisiting BPR: A Replicability Study of a Common Recommender System Baseline [78.00363373925758]
  We study the features of the BPR model, indicating their impact on its performance, and investigate open-source BPR implementations. Our analysis reveals inconsistencies between these implementations and the original BPR paper, leading to a significant decrease in performance of up to 50% for specific implementations. We show that the BPR model can achieve performance levels close to state-of-the-art methods on the top-n recommendation tasks and even outperform them on specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T18:39:53Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• Towards Validating Long-Term User Feedbacks in Interactive Recommendation Systems [36.45966630580796]
  Interactive Recommender Systems (IRSs) have attracted a lot of attention, due to their ability to model interactive processes between users and recommender systems. We revisit experiments on IRS with review datasets and compared RL-based models with a simple reward model that greedily recommends the item with the highest one-step reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T02:34:47Z)
• Retrieval-based Disentangled Representation Learning with Natural Language Supervision [61.75109410513864]
  We present Vocabulary Disentangled Retrieval (VDR), a retrieval-based framework that harnesses natural language as proxies of the underlying data variation to drive disentangled representation learning. Our approach employ a bi-encoder model to represent both data and natural language in a vocabulary space, enabling the model to distinguish intrinsic dimensions that capture characteristics within data through its natural language counterpart, thus disentanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T10:20:42Z)
• Towards Realistic Low-resource Relation Extraction: A Benchmark with Empirical Baseline Study [51.33182775762785]
  This paper presents an empirical study to build relation extraction systems in low-resource settings. We investigate three schemes to evaluate the performance in low-resource settings: (i) different types of prompt-based methods with few-shot labeled data; (ii) diverse balancing methods to address the long-tailed distribution issue; and (iii) data augmentation technologies and self-training to generate more labeled in-domain data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T15:46:37Z)
• A Closer Look at Debiased Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos: Dataset, Metric, and Approach [53.727460222955266]
  Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos (TSGV) aims to ground a natural language sentence in an untrimmed video. Recent studies have found that current benchmark datasets may have obvious moment annotation biases. We introduce a new evaluation metric "dR@n,IoU@m" that discounts the basic recall scores to alleviate the inflating evaluation caused by biased datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T08:58:18Z)
• BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models [41.45240621979654]
  We introduce BEIR, a heterogeneous benchmark for information retrieval. We study the effectiveness of nine state-of-the-art retrieval models in a zero-shot evaluation setup. Dense-retrieval models are computationally more efficient but often underperform other approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T23:29:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.