PRISM-X: Experiments on Personalised Fine-Tuning with Human and Simulated Users

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13307v1
• Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 10:21:14 GMT
• Title: PRISM-X: Experiments on Personalised Fine-Tuning with Human and Simulated Users
• Abstract summary: The efficacy of personalisation methods is often evaluated in academic research using simulated users rather than real people.<n>This raises questions about how users and their simulated counterparts differ in interaction patterns and judgements.
• Score: 14.768125931006798
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Personalisation is a standard feature of conversational AI systems used by millions; yet, the efficacy of personalisation methods is often evaluated in academic research using simulated users rather than real people. This raises questions about how users and their simulated counterparts differ in interaction patterns and judgements, as well as whether personalisation is best achieved through context-based prompting or weight-based fine-tuning. Here, in a large-scale within-subject experiment, we re-recruit 530 participants from 52 countries two years after they gave their preferences in the PRISM dataset (Kirk et al., 2024) to evaluate personalised and non-personalised language models in blinded multi-turn conversations. We find preference fine-tuning (P-DPO, Li et al., 2024) significantly outperforms both a generic model and personalised prompting but adapting to individual preference data yields marginal gains over training on pooled preferences from a diverse population. Beyond length biases, fine-tuning amplifies sycophancy and relationship-seeking behaviours that people reward in short-term evaluations but which may introduce deleterious long-term consequences. Replicating this within-subject experiment with simulated users recovers aggregate model hierarchies but simulators perform far below human self-consistency baselines for individual judgements, discuss different topics, exhibit amplified position biases, and produce feedback dynamics that diverge from humans.

Related papers

• Beyond Borrowed Histories: Person-Aligned User Simulation for Interactive Role-Playing Evaluation [45.19034537358224]
  Role-playing agents (RPAs) have become one of the most important consumer applications of large language models.<n>Existing benchmarks require an RPA to continue a fixed dialogue history and then evaluate the continuation using a fixed rubric detached from the user.<n>We introduce PALATE, a scalable RPA benchmark built on user simulators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T07:55:35Z)
• Learning Dynamic User Personas from Implicit Interaction Streams via Iterative Refinement [4.027292457517535]
  We propose IRIS, a framework that learns dynamic user personas directly from implicit interaction streams.<n>IRIS produces stable personas and distinguishes individual users while revealing limitations of memory-only approaches.<n>We validate IRIS on anonymized real-world Reddit r/AmItheAsshole (AITA) data, with personas built solely from each author's historical interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T04:56:14Z)
• BehaviorBench: Modeling Real-World User Decisions from Behavioral Traces [53.55407626944686]
  textscBehaviorBench is a benchmark for evaluating personalized decision modeling from real-world behavioral traces.<n>textscBehaviorBench reconstructs wallet-level decision histories from observed public prediction-market and on-chain records.<n>Across 2,000 evaluation wallets, the benchmark contains 141,445 Belief instances and 1,485,972 Trade instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T19:04:36Z)
• Synthetic Interaction Data for Scalable Personalization in Large Language Models [67.31884245564086]
  We introduce a high-fidelity synthetic data generation framework called PersonaGym.<n>Unlike prior work that treats personalization as static persona-preference pairs, PersonaGym models a dynamic preference process.<n>We release PersonaAtlas, a large-scale, high-quality, and diverse synthetic dataset of high-fidelity multi-turn personalized interaction trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T20:41:22Z)
• HumanLLM: Towards Personalized Understanding and Simulation of Human Nature [72.55730315685837]
  HumanLLM is a foundation model designed for personalized understanding and simulation of individuals.<n>We first construct the Cognitive Genome, a large-scale corpus curated from real-world user data on platforms like Reddit, Twitter, Blogger, and Amazon.<n>We then formulate diverse learning tasks and perform supervised fine-tuning to empower the model to predict a wide range of individualized human behaviors, thoughts, and experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T09:27:27Z)
• Personalized Reasoning: Just-In-Time Personalization and Why LLMs Fail At It [81.50711040539566]
  Current large language model (LLM) development treats task-solving and preference alignment as separate challenges.<n>We introduce PREFDISCO, an evaluation methodology that transforms static benchmarks into interactive personalization tasks.<n>Our framework creates scenarios where identical questions require different reasoning chains depending on user context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T18:55:28Z)
• Deep Binding of Language Model Virtual Personas: a Study on Approximating Political Partisan Misperceptions [13.929713456538932]
  We propose a novel methodology for constructing virtual personas with synthetic user "backstories" generated as extended, multi-turn interview transcripts.<n>We show that virtual personas conditioned on our backstories closely replicate human response distributions and produce effect sizes that closely match those observed in the original studies of in-group/out-group biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T00:10:34Z)
• When Personalization Meets Reality: A Multi-Faceted Analysis of Personalized Preference Learning [39.22503425640312]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) typically assumes homogeneous preferences across users, overlooking diverse human values and minority viewpoints.<n>We present a multi-faceted evaluation framework that measures not only performance but also fairness, unintended effects, and adaptability across varying levels of preference divergence.<n>These findings highlight the critical need for holistic evaluation approaches to advance the development of more effective and inclusive preference learning systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T14:14:58Z)
• Know You First and Be You Better: Modeling Human-Like User Simulators via Implicit Profiles [37.43150003866563]
  We introduce the User Simulator with Implicit Profiles (USP), a framework that infers implicit user profiles from human-machine interactions to simulate personalized and realistic dialogues.<n>USP outperforms strong baselines in terms of authenticity and diversity while maintaining comparable consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T09:26:54Z)
• Comparison-based Active Preference Learning for Multi-dimensional Personalization [7.349038301460469]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable success, but aligning them with human preferences remains a core challenge.<n>Recent studies have explored multi-dimensional personalization, which aims to enable models to generate responses personalized to explicit preferences.<n>We propose Active Multi-dimensional Preference Learning (AMPLe), designed to capture implicit user preferences from interactively collected comparative feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T11:49:33Z)
• ComPO: Community Preferences for Language Model Personalization [122.54846260663922]
  ComPO is a method to personalize preference optimization in language models. We collect and release ComPRed, a question answering dataset with community-level preferences from Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T14:02:40Z)
• Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction [51.72200436159636]
  We train large language models (LLMs) that can ''interact to align''<n>We develop a multi-turn preference dataset containing 3K+ multi-turn conversations in tree structures.<n>For evaluation, we establish the ALOE benchmark, consisting of 100 carefully selected examples and well-designed metrics to measure the customized alignment performance during conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T17:48:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.