AI-Generated Slides: Are They Good? Can Students Tell?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13532v1
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 13:46:12 GMT
- Title: AI-Generated Slides: Are They Good? Can Students Tell?
- Abstract summary: This paper examines using GenAI to help generate slides from instructor authored course notes, emphasizing instructor and student perceptions.<n>We choose the best slides to use (with some modification) in a real course setting, and compare the student perception of human vs. AI generated slides.<n>Students rate GenAI slides to be of similar quality as instructor-created slides, and cannot reliably identify which slides are AI-generated.
- Score: 4.396239847407563
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As generative AI (GenAI) tools become easily accessible, there is promise in using such tools to support instructors. To that end, this paper examines using GenAI to help generate slides from instructor authored course notes, emphasizing instructor and student perceptions. We examine an end-to-end education tool (NotebookLM), two general-purpose LLMs (Claude, M365 Copilot), and two coding assistants (Cursor, Claude Code). We first analyze whether GenAI generated slides are ``good'' via narrative assessment by educators. We choose the best slides to use (with some modification) in a real course setting, and compare the student perception of human vs. AI generated slides. We find that coding assistant tools produce slides that were most accurate, complete, and pedagogically sound. Additionally, students rate GenAI slides to be of similar quality as instructor-created slides, and cannot reliably identify which slides are AI-generated. Additionally, we find a negative correlation between a high quality rating and a high ``AI-generated'' rating, suggesting students associate poor quality with the source of the slides being AI. These findings highlight promising opportunities for integrating GenAI into instructional design workflows and call for further research on how educators can best harness such tools responsibly and effectively.
Related papers
- Quick Build, Careful Check? Generative AI Use in Hackathons [83.0493885475068]
We report an exploratory interview study with participants at an AI-themed hackathon in central Europe.<n>We found that participants used GenAI for purposes beyond coding, including learning unfamiliar topics, brainstorming, and preparing documentation.<n>We also found that all participants converged on an unwritten practice of checking GenAI output before using it, yet their ability to actually verify was constrained by time pressure and limited domain knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-31T08:59:18Z) - MAIC-UI: Making Interactive Courseware with Generative UI [55.66338307665182]
We present MAIC-UI, a zero-code authoring system that enables educators to create and rapidly edit interactive courseware.<n>MAIC-UI employs structured knowledge analysis with multi-modal understanding to ensure pedagogical rigor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T16:15:04Z) - Transforming Higher Education with AI-Powered Video Lectures [0.2538209532048866]
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into video lecture production has the potential to transform higher education.<n>This paper investigates a semi automated workflow that combines Google Gemini for script generation, Amazon Polly for voice synthesis, and Microsoft PowerPoint for video assembly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-30T23:33:10Z) - Using Generative AI in Software Design Education: An Experience Report [0.6827423171182154]
Students were required to use GenAI to help complete a team-based assignment.<n>Students identified numerous ways ChatGPT helped them in their design process.<n>We identified several key lessons for educators in how to deploy GenAI in a software design class effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-26T18:40:16Z) - From Recall to Reasoning: Automated Question Generation for Deeper Math Learning through Large Language Models [44.99833362998488]
We investigated the first steps for optimizing content creation for advanced math.<n>We looked at the ability of GenAI to produce high-quality practice problems that are relevant to the course content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-17T08:30:10Z) - Insights from the Frontline: GenAI Utilization Among Software Engineering Students [19.31786879151898]
Generative AI (genAI) tools have become ubiquitous in software engineering (SE)<n>We explore the academic experiences of using genAI tools to complement SE learning and implementations.<n>We uncover the contexts where these tools are helpful and where they pose challenges, along with examining why these challenges arise and how they impact students.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-20T07:30:51Z) - Beyond the Hype: A Comprehensive Review of Current Trends in Generative AI Research, Teaching Practices, and Tools [4.352985782794601]
In 2024, new research started to emerge on the effects of GenAI usage in the computing classroom.<n>New data involve the use of GenAI to support classroom instruction at scale and to teach students how to code with GenAI.<n>New class of tools is emerging that can provide personalized feedback to students on their programming assignments or teach both programming and prompting skills at the same time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-19T11:01:11Z) - Identifying and Mitigating the Security Risks of Generative AI [179.2384121957896]
This paper reports the findings of a workshop held at Google on the dual-use dilemma posed by GenAI.
GenAI can be used just as well by attackers to generate new attacks and increase the velocity and efficacy of existing attacks.
We discuss short-term and long-term goals for the community on this topic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-28T18:51:09Z) - GenNI: Human-AI Collaboration for Data-Backed Text Generation [102.08127062293111]
Table2Text systems generate textual output based on structured data utilizing machine learning.
GenNI (Generation Negotiation Interface) is an interactive visual system for high-level human-AI collaboration in producing descriptive text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-19T18:07:07Z) - Iterative Teacher-Aware Learning [136.05341445369265]
In human pedagogy, teachers and students can interact adaptively to maximize communication efficiency.
We propose a gradient optimization based teacher-aware learner who can incorporate teacher's cooperative intention into the likelihood function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-01T00:27:47Z) - Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local
Explanations Impact Annotator Experience [76.9910678786031]
We propose a novel paradigm of explainable active learning (XAL), by introducing techniques from the recently surging field of explainable AI (XAI) into an Active Learning setting.
Our study shows benefits of AI explanation as interfaces for machine teaching--supporting trust calibration and enabling rich forms of teaching feedback, and potential drawbacks--anchoring effect with the model judgment and cognitive workload.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-24T22:52:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.