Sheaf-Theoretic Transport and Obstruction for Detecting Scientific Theory Shift in AI Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14033v1
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 18:46:17 GMT
- Title: Sheaf-Theoretic Transport and Obstruction for Detecting Scientific Theory Shift in AI Agents
- Abstract summary: This paper develops a finite sheaf-theoretic framework for detecting theory-shift candidates through transport and obstruction.<n>We evaluate the framework on a controlled transition-card benchmark designed to separate deformation within a source language from extension of that language.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Scientific theory shift in AI agents requires more than fitting equations to data. An artificial scientific agent must detect whether an existing representational framework remains transportable into a new regime, or whether its language has become locally-to-globally obstructed and must be extended. This paper develops a finite sheaf-theoretic framework for detecting theory-shift candidates through transport and obstruction. Contexts are organized as a local-to-global structure in which source, overlap, target, and validation charts are fitted, restricted, and tested for gluing. Obstruction measures failure of coherence through residual fit, overlap incompatibility, constraint violation, limiting-relation failure, and representational cost. We evaluate the framework on a controlled transition-card benchmark designed to separate deformation within a source language from extension of that language. The main result is direct obstruction ranking: the intended deformation or extension is usually the lowest-obstruction candidate, and transition type is separated in the benchmark. A constellation kernel over the same signatures is included only as a secondary representational-similarity probe. The aim is not to reconstruct historical paradigm shifts or solve open-ended autonomous theory invention, but to isolate a finite diagnostic subproblem for AI agents: detecting when representational transport fails and extension becomes the coherent next move.
Related papers
- A cubical formalisation of topos causal models: intervention, sheaf gluing, and the intuitionistic do-calculus [5.076419064097734]
We give the first machine-checked account of a 1-topos core, in Cubical Agda.<n>We show that interventions and Pearl's rules are stable under every topology.<n>We add a phenomenon the programme does not consider: a machine-checked contextuality obstruction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-17T05:05:31Z) - Self-Revising Discovery Systems for Science: A Categorical Framework for Agentic Artificial Intelligence [1.1458853556386797]
We develop a category-theoretic account of agentic discovery for materials science.<n>In CategoryScienceClaw, typed skills, artifacts, open needs, workflow mutation, gates, stress tests, and public discourse become a proof-carrying knowledge-computation graph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-31T20:29:43Z) - Towards Domain-Generalized Open-Vocabulary Object Detection: A Progressive Domain-invariant Cross-modal Alignment Method [59.30562121800656]
Open-Vocabulary Object Detection has achieved remarkable success in generalizing to novel categories.<n>We provide a principled revisit of the OVOD paradigm, uncovering a fundamental vulnerability.<n>We propose Progressive Domain-invariant Cross-modal Alignment (PICA)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-29T07:39:31Z) - AEGIS: From Clues to Verdicts -- Graph-Guided Deep Vulnerability Reasoning via Dialectics and Meta-Auditing [9.271196825503417]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for vulnerability detection, yet their reasoning remains fundamentally unsound.<n>We present AEGIS, a novel multi-agent framework that shifts detection from ungrounded speculation to forensic verification over a closed factual substrate.<n>It reduces the false positive rate by up to 54.40% compared to leading baselines, at an average cost of $0.09 per sample without any task-specific training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-21T04:12:04Z) - Anatomy of a Lie: A Multi-Stage Diagnostic Framework for Tracing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models [62.932580559941414]
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) frequently "hallucinate" - generate plausible yet factually incorrect statements.<n>We propose a new paradigm for diagnosing hallucinations, recasting them from static output errors into dynamic pathologies of a model's computational cognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-16T17:20:38Z) - To Throw a Stone with Six Birds: On Agents and Agenthood [0.0]
Six Birds Theory (SBT) treats macroscopic objects as induced closures rather than primitives.<n>We give a type-correct account of agency within SBT.<n>We operationalize this contract in finite controlled systems using four checkable components.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T10:46:23Z) - Think Locally, Explain Globally: Graph-Guided LLM Investigations via Local Reasoning and Belief Propagation [5.191980417814362]
LLM agents excel when environments are mostly static and the needed information fits in a model's context window.<n>ReAct-style agents are especially brittle in this regime.<n>We propose EoG, a framework in which an LLM performs bounded local evidence mining and labeling (cause vs symptom) while a deterministic controller manages, state, and belief propagation to compute a minimal explanatory frontier.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-25T17:27:19Z) - Generative Human-Object Interaction Detection via Differentiable Cognitive Steering of Multi-modal LLMs [85.69785384599827]
Human-object interaction (HOI) detection aims to localize human-object pairs and the interactions between them.<n>Existing methods operate under a closed-world assumption, treating the task as a classification problem over a small, predefined verb set.<n>We propose GRASP-HO, a novel Generative Reasoning And Steerable Perception framework that reformulates HOI detection from the closed-set classification task to the open-vocabulary generation problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-19T14:41:50Z) - The Epistemic Suite: A Post-Foundational Diagnostic Methodology for Assessing AI Knowledge Claims [0.7233897166339268]
This paper introduces the Epistemic Suite, a diagnostic methodology for surfacing the conditions under which AI outputs are produced and received.<n>Rather than determining truth or falsity, the Suite operates through twenty diagnostic lenses to reveal patterns such as confidence laundering, narrative compression, displaced authority, and temporal drift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-20T00:29:38Z) - Neuro-Symbolic Entropy Regularization [78.16196949641079]
In structured prediction, the goal is to jointly predict many output variables that together encode a structured object.
One approach -- entropy regularization -- posits that decision boundaries should lie in low-probability regions.
We propose a loss, neuro-symbolic entropy regularization, that encourages the model to confidently predict a valid object.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-25T06:23:10Z) - Transporting Causal Mechanisms for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation [98.67770293233961]
We propose Transporting Causal Mechanisms (TCM) to identify the confounder stratum and representations.
TCM achieves state-of-the-art performance on three challenging Unsupervised Domain Adaptation benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-23T07:25:15Z) - Weakly-Supervised Cross-Domain Adaptation for Endoscopic Lesions
Segmentation [79.58311369297635]
We propose a new weakly-supervised lesions transfer framework, which can explore transferable domain-invariant knowledge across different datasets.
A Wasserstein quantified transferability framework is developed to highlight widerange transferable contextual dependencies.
A novel self-supervised pseudo label generator is designed to equally provide confident pseudo pixel labels for both hard-to-transfer and easy-to-transfer target samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-08T02:26:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.