AI Outperforms Humans in Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment via LLM-Based Interviews and Semantic Feature Extraction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14761v1
• Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 12:24:23 GMT
• Title: AI Outperforms Humans in Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment via LLM-Based Interviews and Semantic Feature Extraction
• Abstract summary: Accurately predicting individual aesthetic evaluation for images is a fundamental challenge for AI.<n>We develop an integrated DL-LLM system that elicits aesthetic preferences through semi-structured interviews.<n>Our results show that the proposed system outperforms all of them, with particularly strong performance on highly-rated images.
• Score: 2.905751301655124
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Accurately predicting individual aesthetic evaluation for images is a fundamental challenge for AI. Various deep learning (DL)-based models have been proposed for this task, training on image evaluation data to extract objective low-level features. However, aesthetic preferences are inherently subjective and individual-dependent. Accurate prediction thus requires the extraction of high-level semantic features of images and the active collection of preference information from the target individual. To address this issue, we focus on the utility of Large Language Models (LLMs) pretrained on vast amounts of textual data, and develop an integrated DL-LLM system. The system actively elicits aesthetic preferences through LLM-based semi-structured interviews and predicts aesthetic evaluation by leveraging both low-level and high-level features. In our experiments, we compare the proposed system against conventional systems, human predictors, and the target individual's own re-evaluations after a certain time interval. Our results show that the proposed system outperforms all of them, with particularly strong performance on highly-rated images. Moreover, the prediction error of the proposed system is smaller than within-person variability, while human predictors show the largest error, likely due to the influence of their own aesthetic values. These results suggest that AI may be better positioned than others or one's future self to capture individual aesthetic preferences at a given point. This opens a new question of whether AI could serve as a deeper interpreter of human aesthetic sensibility than humans themselves.

Related papers

• Multi-Objective Task-Aware Predictor for Image-Text Alignment [39.642519339252054]
  We propose a plug-and-play architecture to build a robust predictor, MULTI-TAP, capable of both multi and single-objective scoring.<n> MULTI-TAP can produce a single overall score, utilizing a reward head built on top of a large vision-language model.<n>By training a lightweight ridge regression layer on the frozen hidden states of a pre-trained LVLM, MULTI-TAP can produce fine-grained scores for multiple human-interpretable objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T10:55:33Z)
• Improving Large Vision and Language Models by Learning from a Panel of Peers [27.83658413272528]
  We propose a novel Panel-of-Peers learning framework inspired by collaborative learning among humans.<n>By simulating a peer review system, our models generate, assess, and refine outputs in response to a curated set of prompts.<n>Our experiments show significant improvement across multiple benchmarks, demonstrating the potential of peer evaluations as a scalable alternative to self-supervised alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T16:43:48Z)
• Mitigating Low-Level Visual Hallucinations Requires Self-Awareness: Database, Model and Training Strategy [53.07517728420411]
  We introduce the first instruction database specifically focused on hallucinations in low-level vision tasks.<n>We propose the Self-Awareness Failure Elimination (SAFEQA) model to improve the perception and comprehension abilities of the model in low-level vision tasks.<n>We conduct comprehensive experiments on low-level vision tasks, with the results demonstrating that our proposed method significantly enhances self-awareness of the model in these tasks and reduces hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T16:05:01Z)
• Systematic Reward Gap Optimization for Mitigating VLM Hallucinations [34.71750379630014]
  We introduce Topic-level Preference Rewriting (TPR), a novel framework designed for the systematic optimization of reward gap configuration.<n>TPR provides topic-level control over fine-grained semantic details, enabling advanced data curation strategies.<n>It significantly reduces hallucinations by up to 93% on ObjectHal-Bench, and also exhibits superior data efficiency towards robust and cost-effective VLM alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T09:42:07Z)
• Aligning Vision Models with Human Aesthetics in Retrieval: Benchmarks and Algorithms [91.19304518033144]
  We aim to align vision models with human aesthetic standards in a retrieval system. We propose a preference-based reinforcement learning method that fine-tunes the vision models to better align the vision models with human aesthetics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T17:59:20Z)
• Enhancing Large Vision Language Models with Self-Training on Image Comprehension [131.14381425260706]
  We introduce Self-Training on Image (STIC), which emphasizes a self-training approach specifically for image comprehension. First, the model self-constructs a preference for image descriptions using unlabeled images. To further self-improve reasoning on the extracted visual information, we let the model reuse a small portion of existing instruction-tuning data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T05:53:49Z)
• Opinion-Unaware Blind Image Quality Assessment using Multi-Scale Deep Feature Statistics [54.08757792080732]
  We propose integrating deep features from pre-trained visual models with a statistical analysis model to achieve opinion-unaware BIQA (OU-BIQA) Our proposed model exhibits superior consistency with human visual perception compared to state-of-the-art BIQA models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T06:09:34Z)
• Quality Assessment for AI Generated Images with Instruction Tuning [58.41087653543607]
  We first establish a novel Image Quality Assessment (IQA) database for AIGIs, termed AIGCIQA2023+.<n>This paper presents a MINT-IQA model to evaluate and explain human preferences for AIGIs from Multi-perspectives with INstruction Tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T17:45:11Z)
• Multi-Modal Prompt Learning on Blind Image Quality Assessment [65.0676908930946]
  Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models benefit significantly from semantic information, which allows them to treat different types of objects distinctly. Traditional methods, hindered by a lack of sufficiently annotated data, have employed the CLIP image-text pretraining model as their backbone to gain semantic awareness. Recent approaches have attempted to address this mismatch using prompt technology, but these solutions have shortcomings. This paper introduces an innovative multi-modal prompt-based methodology for IQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T11:45:32Z)
• VILA: Learning Image Aesthetics from User Comments with Vision-Language Pretraining [53.470662123170555]
  We propose learning image aesthetics from user comments, and exploring vision-language pretraining methods to learn multimodal aesthetic representations. Specifically, we pretrain an image-text encoder-decoder model with image-comment pairs, using contrastive and generative objectives to learn rich and generic aesthetic semantics without human labels. Our results show that our pretrained aesthetic vision-language model outperforms prior works on image aesthetic captioning over the AVA-Captions dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T23:57:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.